在市级急症住院部对患有多种药物的老年人进行药物审查时,各级医疗服务机构之间的合作(COOP II 研究):随机对照试验的研究方案

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08442-w
Leonor Roa Santervas, Torgeir Bruun Wyller, Eva Skovlund, Janicke Liaaen Jensen, Katrine Gahre Fjeld, Lene Hystad Hove, Ingrid Beate Ringstad, Lena Bugge Nordberg, Kristin Mæland Mellingen, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Rita Romskaug
{"title":"在市级急症住院部对患有多种药物的老年人进行药物审查时,各级医疗服务机构之间的合作(COOP II 研究):随机对照试验的研究方案","authors":"Leonor Roa Santervas, Torgeir Bruun Wyller, Eva Skovlund, Janicke Liaaen Jensen, Katrine Gahre Fjeld, Lene Hystad Hove, Ingrid Beate Ringstad, Lena Bugge Nordberg, Kristin Mæland Mellingen, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Rita Romskaug","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08442-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polypharmacy and inappropriate drug use are associated with adverse health outcomes in older people. Collaborative interventions between geriatricians and general practitioners have demonstrated effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes for complex medication regimens in home-dwelling patients. Since 2012, Norwegian municipalities have established municipal in-patient acute care (MipAC) units, designed to contribute towards reducing the number of hospital admissions. These units predominantly serve older people who typically benefit from multidisciplinary approaches. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of cooperative medication reviews conducted by MipAC physicians, supervised by geriatricians, and in collaboration with general practitioners, on health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in MipAC patients ≥ 70 years with polypharmacy. Additionally, the study aims to assess the carbon footprint of the intervention. This is a randomized, single-blind, controlled superiority trial with 16 weeks follow-up. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the control group, receiving usual care at the MipAC unit, or to the intervention group which in addition receive clinical medication reviews that go beyond what is considered usual care. The medication reviews will evaluate medication appropriateness using a structured but individualized framework, and the physicians will receive supervision from geriatricians. Following the clinical medication reviews, the MipAC physicians will arrange telephone meetings with the participants’ general practitioners to combine their assessments in a joint medication review. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life as measured by the 15D instrument. Secondary outcomes include physical and cognitive functioning, oral health, falls, admissions to healthcare facilities, and mortality. This study aims to identify potential clinical benefits of collaborative, clinical medication reviews within community-level MipAC units for older patients with polypharmacy. The results may offer valuable insights into optimizing patient care in comparable municipal healthcare settings. The study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov 30.08.2023 with identifier NCT06020391.","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation across healthcare service levels for medication reviews in older people with polypharmacy admitted to a municipal in-patient acute care unit (The COOP II Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Leonor Roa Santervas, Torgeir Bruun Wyller, Eva Skovlund, Janicke Liaaen Jensen, Katrine Gahre Fjeld, Lene Hystad Hove, Ingrid Beate Ringstad, Lena Bugge Nordberg, Kristin Mæland Mellingen, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Rita Romskaug\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08442-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polypharmacy and inappropriate drug use are associated with adverse health outcomes in older people. Collaborative interventions between geriatricians and general practitioners have demonstrated effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes for complex medication regimens in home-dwelling patients. Since 2012, Norwegian municipalities have established municipal in-patient acute care (MipAC) units, designed to contribute towards reducing the number of hospital admissions. These units predominantly serve older people who typically benefit from multidisciplinary approaches. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of cooperative medication reviews conducted by MipAC physicians, supervised by geriatricians, and in collaboration with general practitioners, on health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in MipAC patients ≥ 70 years with polypharmacy. Additionally, the study aims to assess the carbon footprint of the intervention. This is a randomized, single-blind, controlled superiority trial with 16 weeks follow-up. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the control group, receiving usual care at the MipAC unit, or to the intervention group which in addition receive clinical medication reviews that go beyond what is considered usual care. The medication reviews will evaluate medication appropriateness using a structured but individualized framework, and the physicians will receive supervision from geriatricians. Following the clinical medication reviews, the MipAC physicians will arrange telephone meetings with the participants’ general practitioners to combine their assessments in a joint medication review. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life as measured by the 15D instrument. Secondary outcomes include physical and cognitive functioning, oral health, falls, admissions to healthcare facilities, and mortality. This study aims to identify potential clinical benefits of collaborative, clinical medication reviews within community-level MipAC units for older patients with polypharmacy. The results may offer valuable insights into optimizing patient care in comparable municipal healthcare settings. The study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov 30.08.2023 with identifier NCT06020391.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08442-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08442-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多重用药和用药不当与老年人的不良健康后果有关。老年病学专家与全科医生之间的合作干预措施已证明能够有效改善居家病人复杂用药方案的临床疗效。自2012年起,挪威各城市设立了市级急症住院护理单位(MipAC),旨在减少入院人数。这些机构的主要服务对象是老年人,他们通常受益于多学科治疗方法。本研究的主要目的是评估 MipAC 医生在老年病学专家的监督下,与全科医生合作开展的合作用药审查对年龄≥ 70 岁、使用多种药物的 MipAC 患者的健康相关生活质量和临床疗效的影响。此外,该研究还旨在评估干预措施的碳足迹。这是一项为期 16 周的随机、单盲、对照优效试验。参与者将被随机分配到对照组或干预组,对照组的参与者将在 MipAC 病房接受常规护理,干预组的参与者则将接受超出常规护理范围的临床药物审查。用药审查将采用结构化但个性化的框架来评估用药的适当性,医生将接受老年病学专家的指导。在临床用药审查之后,MipAC 的医生将安排与参与者的全科医生进行电话会议,在联合用药审查中综合他们的评估结果。主要结果是由 15D 仪器测量的与健康相关的生活质量。次要结果包括身体和认知功能、口腔健康、跌倒、入住医疗机构和死亡率。本研究旨在确定在社区级 MipAC 单位内对使用多种药物的老年患者进行合作性临床用药审查的潜在临床益处。研究结果可为优化同类城市医疗机构的患者护理提供有价值的见解。该研究已于 2023 年 8 月 30 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了前瞻性注册,标识符为 NCT06020391。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cooperation across healthcare service levels for medication reviews in older people with polypharmacy admitted to a municipal in-patient acute care unit (The COOP II Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Polypharmacy and inappropriate drug use are associated with adverse health outcomes in older people. Collaborative interventions between geriatricians and general practitioners have demonstrated effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes for complex medication regimens in home-dwelling patients. Since 2012, Norwegian municipalities have established municipal in-patient acute care (MipAC) units, designed to contribute towards reducing the number of hospital admissions. These units predominantly serve older people who typically benefit from multidisciplinary approaches. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of cooperative medication reviews conducted by MipAC physicians, supervised by geriatricians, and in collaboration with general practitioners, on health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in MipAC patients ≥ 70 years with polypharmacy. Additionally, the study aims to assess the carbon footprint of the intervention. This is a randomized, single-blind, controlled superiority trial with 16 weeks follow-up. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the control group, receiving usual care at the MipAC unit, or to the intervention group which in addition receive clinical medication reviews that go beyond what is considered usual care. The medication reviews will evaluate medication appropriateness using a structured but individualized framework, and the physicians will receive supervision from geriatricians. Following the clinical medication reviews, the MipAC physicians will arrange telephone meetings with the participants’ general practitioners to combine their assessments in a joint medication review. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life as measured by the 15D instrument. Secondary outcomes include physical and cognitive functioning, oral health, falls, admissions to healthcare facilities, and mortality. This study aims to identify potential clinical benefits of collaborative, clinical medication reviews within community-level MipAC units for older patients with polypharmacy. The results may offer valuable insights into optimizing patient care in comparable municipal healthcare settings. The study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov 30.08.2023 with identifier NCT06020391.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-stimulation controlled study of transcranial magnetic stimulation with precision navigation for the treatment of multiple system atrophy. Role of the screening with coronary computed tomography angiography on lipid management and risk factors control in an asymptomatic Chinese population: a community-based, parallel-group, open-label, randomized clinical trial (RESPECT2). Role of ultra-processed foods in modulating the effect of Mediterranean diet on human and planet health-study protocol of the PROMENADE randomized controlled trial. Self-management support program delivered in the sub-acute phase after traumatic injury-study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised multiple baseline trial evaluating Knowledge Insight Tools (KIT), a cognitive behavioural therapy-informed school-based counselling intervention for children and young people in UK secondary schools with low mood and anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1