澳大利亚绿党的公共财产开发商:投入产出分析

Chad Satterlee
{"title":"澳大利亚绿党的公共财产开发商:投入产出分析","authors":"Chad Satterlee","doi":"10.1111/1467-8454.12376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian Greens have recently proposed the establishment of a new federal government agency to build 360,000 extra homes over five years. These homes would be sold or rented at below‐market rates. The appraisal of this plan has so far been confined to a fiscal balance perspective, where completed homes are sold, rental income is received, and government administration and borrowing costs are serviced. This ignores the flow‐on effects on the broader economy from expanded residential building construction activity. This paper starts to fill this gap by using a simple Leontief input–output model to analyse a counterfactual in which the Greens' plan is partially implemented into the structure of the Australian economy in 2021–2022. In light of the $84.14 billion static change in the level of total national product that, other things equal, must have occurred to satisfy an augmented final use bill corresponding to the Greens' plan, the simulation finds that projected imposts on the federal budget are rendered relatively modest. Potential extensions and applications of the model for policymakers are considered.<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JEL</jats:styled-content> Classification: D5, E1, P5","PeriodicalId":501500,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Papers ","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Australian Greens' Public Property Developer: An Input–Output Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chad Satterlee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8454.12376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Australian Greens have recently proposed the establishment of a new federal government agency to build 360,000 extra homes over five years. These homes would be sold or rented at below‐market rates. The appraisal of this plan has so far been confined to a fiscal balance perspective, where completed homes are sold, rental income is received, and government administration and borrowing costs are serviced. This ignores the flow‐on effects on the broader economy from expanded residential building construction activity. This paper starts to fill this gap by using a simple Leontief input–output model to analyse a counterfactual in which the Greens' plan is partially implemented into the structure of the Australian economy in 2021–2022. In light of the $84.14 billion static change in the level of total national product that, other things equal, must have occurred to satisfy an augmented final use bill corresponding to the Greens' plan, the simulation finds that projected imposts on the federal budget are rendered relatively modest. Potential extensions and applications of the model for policymakers are considered.<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">JEL</jats:styled-content> Classification: D5, E1, P5\",\"PeriodicalId\":501500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Economic Papers \",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Economic Papers \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Papers ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚绿党最近提议成立一个新的联邦政府机构,在五年内增建 36 万套住房。这些住房将以低于市场的价格出售或出租。迄今为止,对这一计划的评估一直局限于财政平衡的角度,即售出竣工住宅、获得租金收入以及支付政府管理和借贷成本。这就忽略了扩大住宅建筑活动对更广泛经济的流动效应。本文利用一个简单的列昂惕夫(Leontief)投入产出模型,分析了绿党计划在 2021-2022 年部分落实到澳大利亚经济结构中的反事实,从而开始填补这一空白。考虑到在其他条件不变的情况下,为满足与绿党计划相对应的扩大最终用途法案,国民生产总值水平必须发生 841.4 亿澳元的静态变化,模拟结果发现,预计对联邦预算的影响相对较小。本文还考虑了该模型的潜在扩展和对决策者的应用:D5, E1, P5
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Australian Greens' Public Property Developer: An Input–Output Analysis
The Australian Greens have recently proposed the establishment of a new federal government agency to build 360,000 extra homes over five years. These homes would be sold or rented at below‐market rates. The appraisal of this plan has so far been confined to a fiscal balance perspective, where completed homes are sold, rental income is received, and government administration and borrowing costs are serviced. This ignores the flow‐on effects on the broader economy from expanded residential building construction activity. This paper starts to fill this gap by using a simple Leontief input–output model to analyse a counterfactual in which the Greens' plan is partially implemented into the structure of the Australian economy in 2021–2022. In light of the $84.14 billion static change in the level of total national product that, other things equal, must have occurred to satisfy an augmented final use bill corresponding to the Greens' plan, the simulation finds that projected imposts on the federal budget are rendered relatively modest. Potential extensions and applications of the model for policymakers are considered.JEL Classification: D5, E1, P5
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Earnings, Productivity and Housing Expenditure: Who Retains the Wage‐Related Agglomeration Effect? Sovereign Bond Holdings, Bank Risk‐Taking, and Macroeconomic Shocks: Evidence From Vietnam Russia's Trade With G7 Countries and Asymmetric J‐Curve Effect The Australian Greens' Public Property Developer: An Input–Output Analysis Is There Still a Catholic Earnings Premium for Men? Evidence From Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1