{"title":"基于人工智能的低水平核废料检测和识别:比较分析","authors":"Aris Duani Rojas, Leonel Lagos, Himanshu Upadhyay, Jayesh Soni, Nagarajan Prabakar","doi":"10.1007/s00521-024-10238-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring environmental safety and regulatory compliance at Department of Energy (DOE) sites demands an efficient and reliable detection system for low-level nuclear waste (LLW). Unlike existing methods that rely on human effort, this paper explores the integration of computer vision algorithms to automate the identification of such waste across DOE facilities. We evaluate the effectiveness of multiple algorithms in classifying nuclear waste materials and their adaptability to newly emerging LLW. Our research introduces and implements five state-of-the-art computer vision models, each representing a different approach to the problem. Through rigorous experimentation and validation, we evaluate these algorithms based on performance, speed, and adaptability. The results reveal a noteworthy trade-off between detection performance and adaptability. YOLOv7 shows the best performance and requires the highest effort to detect new LLW. Conversely, OWL-ViT has lower performance than YOLOv7 and requires minimal effort to detect new LLW. The inference speed does not strongly correlate with performance or adaptability. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of current computer vision algorithms for LLW detection. Each developed model provides a specialized solution with distinct advantages and disadvantages, empowering DOE stakeholders to select the algorithm that aligns best with their specific needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18925,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computing and Applications","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-based detection and identification of low-level nuclear waste: a comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aris Duani Rojas, Leonel Lagos, Himanshu Upadhyay, Jayesh Soni, Nagarajan Prabakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00521-024-10238-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ensuring environmental safety and regulatory compliance at Department of Energy (DOE) sites demands an efficient and reliable detection system for low-level nuclear waste (LLW). Unlike existing methods that rely on human effort, this paper explores the integration of computer vision algorithms to automate the identification of such waste across DOE facilities. We evaluate the effectiveness of multiple algorithms in classifying nuclear waste materials and their adaptability to newly emerging LLW. Our research introduces and implements five state-of-the-art computer vision models, each representing a different approach to the problem. Through rigorous experimentation and validation, we evaluate these algorithms based on performance, speed, and adaptability. The results reveal a noteworthy trade-off between detection performance and adaptability. YOLOv7 shows the best performance and requires the highest effort to detect new LLW. Conversely, OWL-ViT has lower performance than YOLOv7 and requires minimal effort to detect new LLW. The inference speed does not strongly correlate with performance or adaptability. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of current computer vision algorithms for LLW detection. Each developed model provides a specialized solution with distinct advantages and disadvantages, empowering DOE stakeholders to select the algorithm that aligns best with their specific needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Computing and Applications\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Computing and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10238-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computing and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10238-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
要确保能源部(DOE)场址的环境安全和合规性,就需要一个高效可靠的低放射性核废料(LLW)检测系统。与依赖人力的现有方法不同,本文探讨了计算机视觉算法的集成,以自动识别 DOE 设施中的此类废物。我们评估了多种算法在核废料材料分类方面的有效性,以及它们对新出现的 LLW 的适应性。我们的研究引入并实施了五种最先进的计算机视觉模型,每种模型都代表了解决问题的不同方法。通过严格的实验和验证,我们根据性能、速度和适应性对这些算法进行了评估。结果显示,在检测性能和适应性之间存在值得注意的权衡。YOLOv7 的性能最好,但检测新 LLW 所需的工作量最大。相反,OWL-ViT 的性能比 YOLOv7 低,但检测新 LLW 所需的工作量却最小。推理速度与性能或适应性的关系不大。这些发现为了解当前计算机视觉算法在检测 LLW 方面的优势和局限性提供了宝贵的见解。每个开发的模型都提供了具有明显优缺点的专门解决方案,使 DOE 利益相关者能够选择最符合其特定需求的算法。
AI-based detection and identification of low-level nuclear waste: a comparative analysis
Ensuring environmental safety and regulatory compliance at Department of Energy (DOE) sites demands an efficient and reliable detection system for low-level nuclear waste (LLW). Unlike existing methods that rely on human effort, this paper explores the integration of computer vision algorithms to automate the identification of such waste across DOE facilities. We evaluate the effectiveness of multiple algorithms in classifying nuclear waste materials and their adaptability to newly emerging LLW. Our research introduces and implements five state-of-the-art computer vision models, each representing a different approach to the problem. Through rigorous experimentation and validation, we evaluate these algorithms based on performance, speed, and adaptability. The results reveal a noteworthy trade-off between detection performance and adaptability. YOLOv7 shows the best performance and requires the highest effort to detect new LLW. Conversely, OWL-ViT has lower performance than YOLOv7 and requires minimal effort to detect new LLW. The inference speed does not strongly correlate with performance or adaptability. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of current computer vision algorithms for LLW detection. Each developed model provides a specialized solution with distinct advantages and disadvantages, empowering DOE stakeholders to select the algorithm that aligns best with their specific needs.