用混合模型法评估批判性思维培训对批判性思维能力和学习成绩的影响

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1002/rev3.70001
Veli Batdı, Şenel Elaldı, Ceyda Özçelik, Nuriye Semerci, Özlem Miraç Özkaya
{"title":"用混合模型法评估批判性思维培训对批判性思维能力和学习成绩的影响","authors":"Veli Batdı, Şenel Elaldı, Ceyda Özçelik, Nuriye Semerci, Özlem Miraç Özkaya","doi":"10.1002/rev3.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking is among the basic skills for learning needed in the twenty‐first century. In order to develop students' critical thinking skills, it is very important to include different teaching practices in education that will enable them to think critically. The impact of these practices on learners is also curious. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of critical thinking training (CTT) on critical thinking skills and academic achievement with the mixed‐meta method. As a result of the literature review, quantitative (meta‐analysis) and qualitative (meta‐thematic analysis) findings were obtained. Quantitative studies scanned from some databases in line with certain criteria were analysed with CMA 2.0 and MetaWin programs, and learning level, implementation process and course area moderator analyses were conducted. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the effect sizes of critical thinking‐based practices on learners' academic achievement and critical thinking skills were positive with a large‐scale effect at a large level. Qualitative studies on the other hand were analysed with the Maxqda program. As a result of the analysis, the emerging themes were found to be ‘the effect of CTT on the cognitive domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the affective domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the social domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the delivery of the course’, ‘suggestions for CTT’ and ‘the problems encountered in CTT’. The findings revealed that CTT had a positive effect on academic achievement and development of critical thinking skills.<jats:boxed-text content-type=\"box\" position=\"anchor\"><jats:caption>Context and implications</jats:caption>Rationale for this studyThis literature review provides evidence of the effect of critical thinking training on academic achievement and critical thinking skills.Why the new findings matterThe review demonstrates that the effect sizes of critical thinking‐based practices on learners' academic achievement and critical thinking skills were positive, with a large‐scale effect at a large level.Implications for education programmes and researchersConsidering the results obtained that critical thinking practices have a positive effect on academic achievement and critical thinking skills, it can be suggested that more activities and content be prepared in primary and secondary education programmes that will enable students to develop their critical thinking skills. Since more general and comprehensive results can be obtained in terms of qualitative and quantitative aspects with mixed‐meta analysis, it may be recommended to use the relevant method in different subject areas for future research.</jats:boxed-text>","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method\",\"authors\":\"Veli Batdı, Şenel Elaldı, Ceyda Özçelik, Nuriye Semerci, Özlem Miraç Özkaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rev3.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical thinking is among the basic skills for learning needed in the twenty‐first century. In order to develop students' critical thinking skills, it is very important to include different teaching practices in education that will enable them to think critically. The impact of these practices on learners is also curious. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of critical thinking training (CTT) on critical thinking skills and academic achievement with the mixed‐meta method. As a result of the literature review, quantitative (meta‐analysis) and qualitative (meta‐thematic analysis) findings were obtained. Quantitative studies scanned from some databases in line with certain criteria were analysed with CMA 2.0 and MetaWin programs, and learning level, implementation process and course area moderator analyses were conducted. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the effect sizes of critical thinking‐based practices on learners' academic achievement and critical thinking skills were positive with a large‐scale effect at a large level. Qualitative studies on the other hand were analysed with the Maxqda program. As a result of the analysis, the emerging themes were found to be ‘the effect of CTT on the cognitive domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the affective domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the social domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the delivery of the course’, ‘suggestions for CTT’ and ‘the problems encountered in CTT’. The findings revealed that CTT had a positive effect on academic achievement and development of critical thinking skills.<jats:boxed-text content-type=\\\"box\\\" position=\\\"anchor\\\"><jats:caption>Context and implications</jats:caption>Rationale for this studyThis literature review provides evidence of the effect of critical thinking training on academic achievement and critical thinking skills.Why the new findings matterThe review demonstrates that the effect sizes of critical thinking‐based practices on learners' academic achievement and critical thinking skills were positive, with a large‐scale effect at a large level.Implications for education programmes and researchersConsidering the results obtained that critical thinking practices have a positive effect on academic achievement and critical thinking skills, it can be suggested that more activities and content be prepared in primary and secondary education programmes that will enable students to develop their critical thinking skills. Since more general and comprehensive results can be obtained in terms of qualitative and quantitative aspects with mixed‐meta analysis, it may be recommended to use the relevant method in different subject areas for future research.</jats:boxed-text>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批判性思维是二十一世纪所需的基本学习技能之一。为了培养学生的批判性思维能力,在教育中采用不同的教学方法使他们能够进行批判性思维是非常重要的。这些做法对学习者的影响也令人好奇。本研究旨在采用混合模型法评估批判性思维训练(CTT)对批判性思维能力和学业成绩的影响。通过文献综述,获得了定量(元分析)和定性(元专题分析)研究结果。利用 CMA 2.0 和 MetaWin 程序分析了从一些数据库中扫描到的符合特定标准的定量研究,并进行了学习水平、实施过程和课程领域的主持人分析。分析结果表明,基于批判性思维的实践对学习者学业成绩和批判性思维能力的影响大小是正向的,在很大程度上具有大规模效应。另一方面,利用 Maxqda 程序对定性研究进行了分析。分析结果显示,新出现的主题包括 "CTT 对认知领域的影响"、"CTT 对情感领域的影响"、"CTT 对社会领域的影响"、"CTT 对课程实施的影响"、"对 CTT 的建议 "和 "CTT 中遇到的问题"。研究结果表明,CTT 对学业成绩和批判性思维能力的发展有积极的影响。本研究的背景和意义本文献综述为批判性思维训练对学业成绩和批判性思维能力的影响提供了证据。新发现为何重要综述表明,基于批判性思维的实践对学习者学业成绩和批判性思维能力的影响大小是积极的,在很大程度上具有大规模效应。对教育课程和研究人员的启示考虑到批判性思维实践对学业成绩和批判性思维能力有积极影响的结果,可以建议在中小学教育课程中准备更多的活动和内容,使学生能够发展他们的批判性思维能力。由于采用混合模型分析法可以在定性和定量方面获得更普遍和更全面的结果,因此建议在今后的研究中在不同学科领域采用相关方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method
Critical thinking is among the basic skills for learning needed in the twenty‐first century. In order to develop students' critical thinking skills, it is very important to include different teaching practices in education that will enable them to think critically. The impact of these practices on learners is also curious. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of critical thinking training (CTT) on critical thinking skills and academic achievement with the mixed‐meta method. As a result of the literature review, quantitative (meta‐analysis) and qualitative (meta‐thematic analysis) findings were obtained. Quantitative studies scanned from some databases in line with certain criteria were analysed with CMA 2.0 and MetaWin programs, and learning level, implementation process and course area moderator analyses were conducted. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the effect sizes of critical thinking‐based practices on learners' academic achievement and critical thinking skills were positive with a large‐scale effect at a large level. Qualitative studies on the other hand were analysed with the Maxqda program. As a result of the analysis, the emerging themes were found to be ‘the effect of CTT on the cognitive domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the affective domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the social domain’, ‘the effect of CTT on the delivery of the course’, ‘suggestions for CTT’ and ‘the problems encountered in CTT’. The findings revealed that CTT had a positive effect on academic achievement and development of critical thinking skills.Context and implicationsRationale for this studyThis literature review provides evidence of the effect of critical thinking training on academic achievement and critical thinking skills.Why the new findings matterThe review demonstrates that the effect sizes of critical thinking‐based practices on learners' academic achievement and critical thinking skills were positive, with a large‐scale effect at a large level.Implications for education programmes and researchersConsidering the results obtained that critical thinking practices have a positive effect on academic achievement and critical thinking skills, it can be suggested that more activities and content be prepared in primary and secondary education programmes that will enable students to develop their critical thinking skills. Since more general and comprehensive results can be obtained in terms of qualitative and quantitative aspects with mixed‐meta analysis, it may be recommended to use the relevant method in different subject areas for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
The status of culturally relevant teacher education in the European context: A systematic review of research Effectiveness of language‐sensitive subject teaching: Heterogeneity and quality of the evidence and implications for future research Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method Research on teachers of colour and minoritised teachers in majoritarian education systems: A scoping review of the literature in the last two decades Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1