氢气制造--回顾及其可持续性

Satish Vitta
{"title":"氢气制造--回顾及其可持续性","authors":"Satish Vitta","doi":"10.1039/D4SU00420E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Hydrogen is a highly versatile energy vector, and most importantly, its oxidation, which releases energy, is a green process with no associated emissions. Hence, it is considered a green alternative that can supply energy and simultaneously reduce global warming. This gas, however, does not occur naturally in sufficient quantities and needs to be synthesized using different resources. The two most feasible methods for producing H<small><sub>2</sub></small> are steam methane reforming and water splitting <em>via</em> electrolysis. Therefore, these two processes were reviewed first, and subsequently, a complete sustainability analysis was performed using currently available data. It has been found that input raw materials such as methane and water will be required in ‘gigatonne’ quantity every year. Although availability of water does not pose supply risk, methane production falls far short of the requirement and becomes a supply risk. The conversion of these into H<small><sub>2</sub></small> requires energy and results in the production of ‘Gt’ of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. For example, the production of 1 Gt of H<small><sub>2</sub></small> using the steam methane reforming process requires ∼3.6 EJ of energy and releases ∼10 Gt of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. In contrast, water splitting electrolysis requires ∼198 EJ of energy and releases anywhere from 102 Gt to 220 Gt of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, depending on the electricity generation mix. Additionally, they have ecological impacts in the form of acidification, marine toxicity, particulate emissions and so on, which affect all life forms on the earth. This analysis clearly shows that complete transitioning to H<small><sub>2</sub></small>-based energy supply is unsustainable and only a fraction of the energy needs can be supplemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":" 11","pages":" 3202-3221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/su/d4su00420e?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of hydrogen manufacturing: a review\",\"authors\":\"Satish Vitta\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4SU00420E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Hydrogen is a highly versatile energy vector, and most importantly, its oxidation, which releases energy, is a green process with no associated emissions. Hence, it is considered a green alternative that can supply energy and simultaneously reduce global warming. This gas, however, does not occur naturally in sufficient quantities and needs to be synthesized using different resources. The two most feasible methods for producing H<small><sub>2</sub></small> are steam methane reforming and water splitting <em>via</em> electrolysis. Therefore, these two processes were reviewed first, and subsequently, a complete sustainability analysis was performed using currently available data. It has been found that input raw materials such as methane and water will be required in ‘gigatonne’ quantity every year. Although availability of water does not pose supply risk, methane production falls far short of the requirement and becomes a supply risk. The conversion of these into H<small><sub>2</sub></small> requires energy and results in the production of ‘Gt’ of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. For example, the production of 1 Gt of H<small><sub>2</sub></small> using the steam methane reforming process requires ∼3.6 EJ of energy and releases ∼10 Gt of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. In contrast, water splitting electrolysis requires ∼198 EJ of energy and releases anywhere from 102 Gt to 220 Gt of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, depending on the electricity generation mix. Additionally, they have ecological impacts in the form of acidification, marine toxicity, particulate emissions and so on, which affect all life forms on the earth. This analysis clearly shows that complete transitioning to H<small><sub>2</sub></small>-based energy supply is unsustainable and only a fraction of the energy needs can be supplemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSC sustainability\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\" 3202-3221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/su/d4su00420e?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSC sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/su/d4su00420e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/su/d4su00420e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氢气是一种用途广泛的能源载体,最重要的是,氢气氧化释放能量是一个绿色过程,没有相关排放。因此,氢气被认为是一种绿色替代品,可以在提供能源的同时减少全球变暖。然而,这种气体在自然界中的含量并不充足,需要利用不同的资源进行合成。生产 H2 的两种最可行的方法是蒸汽甲烷重整工艺和电解水分裂工艺。因此,首先对这两种工艺进行了审查,随后利用现有数据进行了全面的可持续性分析。分析发现,每年需要输入甲烷和水等原材料 "千兆吨"。虽然水的供应不构成供应风险,但甲烷的生产远远不能满足要求,因此成为供应风险。将甲烷转化为 H2 需要能量,并产生 "千兆吨 "二氧化碳。例如,使用蒸汽甲烷重整工艺生产 1 千兆吨 H2 需要约 3.6 EJ 的能量,并释放约 10 千兆吨 CO2。另一方面,水分裂电解需要约 198 EJ 的能量,并根据发电组合释放出约 1.02 亿吨到 2.20 亿吨的二氧化碳。此外,它们还会造成酸化、海洋毒性、微粒排放等形式的生态影响,从而影响地球上的所有生命形式。这一分析清楚地表明,完全过渡到以 H2 为基础的能源供应是不可持续的,只能补充一部分能源需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability of hydrogen manufacturing: a review

Hydrogen is a highly versatile energy vector, and most importantly, its oxidation, which releases energy, is a green process with no associated emissions. Hence, it is considered a green alternative that can supply energy and simultaneously reduce global warming. This gas, however, does not occur naturally in sufficient quantities and needs to be synthesized using different resources. The two most feasible methods for producing H2 are steam methane reforming and water splitting via electrolysis. Therefore, these two processes were reviewed first, and subsequently, a complete sustainability analysis was performed using currently available data. It has been found that input raw materials such as methane and water will be required in ‘gigatonne’ quantity every year. Although availability of water does not pose supply risk, methane production falls far short of the requirement and becomes a supply risk. The conversion of these into H2 requires energy and results in the production of ‘Gt’ of CO2. For example, the production of 1 Gt of H2 using the steam methane reforming process requires ∼3.6 EJ of energy and releases ∼10 Gt of CO2. In contrast, water splitting electrolysis requires ∼198 EJ of energy and releases anywhere from 102 Gt to 220 Gt of CO2, depending on the electricity generation mix. Additionally, they have ecological impacts in the form of acidification, marine toxicity, particulate emissions and so on, which affect all life forms on the earth. This analysis clearly shows that complete transitioning to H2-based energy supply is unsustainable and only a fraction of the energy needs can be supplemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back cover Inside back cover What is better to enhance the solubility of hydrophobic compounds in aqueous solutions: eutectic solvents or ionic liquids?† Utilizing advancements in chemical sciences for decarbonization: a pathway to sustainable emission and energy reduction The role of the chemical sciences in ‘decarbonizing’ the conversion of energy and industrial and agricultural emissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1