{"title":"广义平滑修剪均值的经验似然法","authors":"Elina Kresse, Emils Silins, Janis Valeinis","doi":"arxiv-2409.05631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces a new version of the smoothly trimmed mean with a more\ngeneral version of weights, which can be used as an alternative to the\nclassical trimmed mean. We derive its asymptotic variance and to further\ninvestigate its properties we establish the empirical likelihood for the new\nestimator. As expected from previous theoretical investigations we show in our\nsimulations a clear advantage of the proposed estimator over the classical\ntrimmed mean estimator. Moreover, the empirical likelihood method gives an\nadditional advantage for data generated from contaminated models. For the\nclassical trimmed mean it is generally recommended in practice to use\nsymmetrical 10\\% or 20\\% trimming. However, if the trimming is done close to\ndata gaps, it can even lead to spurious results, as known from the literature\nand verified by our simulations. Instead, for practical data examples, we\nchoose the smoothing parameters by an optimality criterion that minimises the\nvariance of the proposed estimators.","PeriodicalId":501379,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Statistics Theory","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical likelihood for generalized smoothly trimmed mean\",\"authors\":\"Elina Kresse, Emils Silins, Janis Valeinis\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.05631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper introduces a new version of the smoothly trimmed mean with a more\\ngeneral version of weights, which can be used as an alternative to the\\nclassical trimmed mean. We derive its asymptotic variance and to further\\ninvestigate its properties we establish the empirical likelihood for the new\\nestimator. As expected from previous theoretical investigations we show in our\\nsimulations a clear advantage of the proposed estimator over the classical\\ntrimmed mean estimator. Moreover, the empirical likelihood method gives an\\nadditional advantage for data generated from contaminated models. For the\\nclassical trimmed mean it is generally recommended in practice to use\\nsymmetrical 10\\\\% or 20\\\\% trimming. However, if the trimming is done close to\\ndata gaps, it can even lead to spurious results, as known from the literature\\nand verified by our simulations. Instead, for practical data examples, we\\nchoose the smoothing parameters by an optimality criterion that minimises the\\nvariance of the proposed estimators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Statistics Theory\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Statistics Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Statistics Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Empirical likelihood for generalized smoothly trimmed mean
This paper introduces a new version of the smoothly trimmed mean with a more
general version of weights, which can be used as an alternative to the
classical trimmed mean. We derive its asymptotic variance and to further
investigate its properties we establish the empirical likelihood for the new
estimator. As expected from previous theoretical investigations we show in our
simulations a clear advantage of the proposed estimator over the classical
trimmed mean estimator. Moreover, the empirical likelihood method gives an
additional advantage for data generated from contaminated models. For the
classical trimmed mean it is generally recommended in practice to use
symmetrical 10\% or 20\% trimming. However, if the trimming is done close to
data gaps, it can even lead to spurious results, as known from the literature
and verified by our simulations. Instead, for practical data examples, we
choose the smoothing parameters by an optimality criterion that minimises the
variance of the proposed estimators.