{"title":"不同听源性癫痫易感性大鼠的主动回避学习","authors":"N. M. Surina, I. B. Fedotova, I. I. Poletaeva","doi":"10.1134/s0022093024040239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Learning difficulties are a fairly common comorbid complication\nin patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The relationship between the\npredisposition to epilepsy and the ability to learn is an important\nproblem. The aim of the study was to analyze how the learning capacity\ndiffers in rats with different predispositions to reflex audiogenic\nepilepsy (AE). The success of active avoidance (AAC) conditioning\nin the shuttle box in rats of 3 strains was evaluated. These were\nrats predisposed to audiogenic epilepsy—the Krushinsky–Molodkina\nstrain (KM), strain “4” (selected from a population of F2 hybrids\nof the KM strain and AE non-prone Wistars) and rats of “0” strain,\nselected for the absence of AE from the same population (i.e. these\nstrains differ radically in AE-proneness, but have a similar genetic\nbackground). The training was conducted continuously for 5 days\n(20 presentations per day). Experiments have shown significantly\nmore successful acquisition of this skill in rats of the “0” strain:\nin total, 75% of animals reached the learning criteria for 5 days\nof AAC training (70% AAC per day). The “4” strain rats indices were\nintermediate—41.7%, and only 1 from the 12 rats of the KM strain\n(8.3%) acquired the task according to this protocol. Thus, it was\npossible to identify more successful learning in rats, selected\nfor the absence of AE seizures (strain “0”) compared to rats of\nthe KM and “4” strains (expressing tonic seizures of maximum intensity\nin response to sound exposure). The weakest acquisition was revealed\nin the KM strain, in which the selection process duration for AE\nproneness was significantly longer than in the rats of the “4” strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active Avoidance Learning in Rats with Different Audiogenic Epilepsy Proneness\",\"authors\":\"N. M. Surina, I. B. Fedotova, I. I. Poletaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s0022093024040239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>Learning difficulties are a fairly common comorbid complication\\nin patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The relationship between the\\npredisposition to epilepsy and the ability to learn is an important\\nproblem. The aim of the study was to analyze how the learning capacity\\ndiffers in rats with different predispositions to reflex audiogenic\\nepilepsy (AE). The success of active avoidance (AAC) conditioning\\nin the shuttle box in rats of 3 strains was evaluated. These were\\nrats predisposed to audiogenic epilepsy—the Krushinsky–Molodkina\\nstrain (KM), strain “4” (selected from a population of F2 hybrids\\nof the KM strain and AE non-prone Wistars) and rats of “0” strain,\\nselected for the absence of AE from the same population (i.e. these\\nstrains differ radically in AE-proneness, but have a similar genetic\\nbackground). The training was conducted continuously for 5 days\\n(20 presentations per day). Experiments have shown significantly\\nmore successful acquisition of this skill in rats of the “0” strain:\\nin total, 75% of animals reached the learning criteria for 5 days\\nof AAC training (70% AAC per day). The “4” strain rats indices were\\nintermediate—41.7%, and only 1 from the 12 rats of the KM strain\\n(8.3%) acquired the task according to this protocol. Thus, it was\\npossible to identify more successful learning in rats, selected\\nfor the absence of AE seizures (strain “0”) compared to rats of\\nthe KM and “4” strains (expressing tonic seizures of maximum intensity\\nin response to sound exposure). The weakest acquisition was revealed\\nin the KM strain, in which the selection process duration for AE\\nproneness was significantly longer than in the rats of the “4” strain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0022093024040239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0022093024040239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Active Avoidance Learning in Rats with Different Audiogenic Epilepsy Proneness
Abstract
Learning difficulties are a fairly common comorbid complication
in patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The relationship between the
predisposition to epilepsy and the ability to learn is an important
problem. The aim of the study was to analyze how the learning capacity
differs in rats with different predispositions to reflex audiogenic
epilepsy (AE). The success of active avoidance (AAC) conditioning
in the shuttle box in rats of 3 strains was evaluated. These were
rats predisposed to audiogenic epilepsy—the Krushinsky–Molodkina
strain (KM), strain “4” (selected from a population of F2 hybrids
of the KM strain and AE non-prone Wistars) and rats of “0” strain,
selected for the absence of AE from the same population (i.e. these
strains differ radically in AE-proneness, but have a similar genetic
background). The training was conducted continuously for 5 days
(20 presentations per day). Experiments have shown significantly
more successful acquisition of this skill in rats of the “0” strain:
in total, 75% of animals reached the learning criteria for 5 days
of AAC training (70% AAC per day). The “4” strain rats indices were
intermediate—41.7%, and only 1 from the 12 rats of the KM strain
(8.3%) acquired the task according to this protocol. Thus, it was
possible to identify more successful learning in rats, selected
for the absence of AE seizures (strain “0”) compared to rats of
the KM and “4” strains (expressing tonic seizures of maximum intensity
in response to sound exposure). The weakest acquisition was revealed
in the KM strain, in which the selection process duration for AE
proneness was significantly longer than in the rats of the “4” strain.