评估云计算定价政策的复杂性:市场比较分析

IF 3.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Grid Computing Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s10723-024-09780-4
Vasiliki Liagkou, George Fragiadakis, Evangelia Filiopoulou, Christos Michalakelis, Anargyros Tsadimas, Mara Nikolaidou
{"title":"评估云计算定价政策的复杂性:市场比较分析","authors":"Vasiliki Liagkou, George Fragiadakis, Evangelia Filiopoulou, Christos Michalakelis, Anargyros Tsadimas, Mara Nikolaidou","doi":"10.1007/s10723-024-09780-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cloud computing has gained popularity at a breakneck pace over the last few years. It has revolutionized the way businesses operate by providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for their computing needs. Cloud providers offer a range of services with a variety of pricing schemes. Cloud pricing schemes are based on functional factors like CPU, RAM, and storage, combined with different payment options, such as pay-per-use, subscription-based, and non-functional aspects, such as scalability and availability. While cloud pricing can be complicated, it is critical for businesses to thoroughly assess and compare pricing policies along with technical requirements to ensure they design an investment strategy. This paper evaluates current pricing strategies for IaaS, CaaS, and PaaS cloud services and also focuses on the three leading cloud providers, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. To compare pricing policies between different services and providers, a hedonic price index is constructed for each service type based on data collected in 2022. Using the hedonic price index, a comparative analysis between them becomes feasible. The results revealed that providers follow the very same pricing pattern for IaaS and CaaS, with CPU being the main driver of cloud pricing schemes, whereas PaaS pricing fluctuates among cloud providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Grid Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Complexity of Cloud Pricing Policies: A Comparative Market Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vasiliki Liagkou, George Fragiadakis, Evangelia Filiopoulou, Christos Michalakelis, Anargyros Tsadimas, Mara Nikolaidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10723-024-09780-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cloud computing has gained popularity at a breakneck pace over the last few years. It has revolutionized the way businesses operate by providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for their computing needs. Cloud providers offer a range of services with a variety of pricing schemes. Cloud pricing schemes are based on functional factors like CPU, RAM, and storage, combined with different payment options, such as pay-per-use, subscription-based, and non-functional aspects, such as scalability and availability. While cloud pricing can be complicated, it is critical for businesses to thoroughly assess and compare pricing policies along with technical requirements to ensure they design an investment strategy. This paper evaluates current pricing strategies for IaaS, CaaS, and PaaS cloud services and also focuses on the three leading cloud providers, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. To compare pricing policies between different services and providers, a hedonic price index is constructed for each service type based on data collected in 2022. Using the hedonic price index, a comparative analysis between them becomes feasible. The results revealed that providers follow the very same pricing pattern for IaaS and CaaS, with CPU being the main driver of cloud pricing schemes, whereas PaaS pricing fluctuates among cloud providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Grid Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Grid Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-024-09780-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Grid Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-024-09780-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几年,云计算以迅猛的速度得到普及。它为企业的计算需求提供了灵活、可扩展的基础设施,从而彻底改变了企业的运营方式。云计算提供商提供一系列服务和各种定价方案。云定价方案基于 CPU、内存和存储等功能因素,结合不同的付款方式,如按使用付费、订阅式以及可扩展性和可用性等非功能方面。虽然云定价可能很复杂,但企业必须全面评估和比较定价政策以及技术要求,以确保设计出投资策略。本文评估了IaaS、CaaS和PaaS云服务的当前定价策略,并重点关注了亚马逊、微软和谷歌这三家领先的云服务提供商。为了比较不同服务和提供商之间的定价政策,本文根据 2022 年收集的数据为每种服务类型构建了享乐价格指数。利用享乐价格指数,可以对它们进行比较分析。结果显示,提供商对 IaaS 和 CaaS 的定价模式完全相同,CPU 是云定价方案的主要驱动因素,而 PaaS 的定价则在云提供商之间波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Complexity of Cloud Pricing Policies: A Comparative Market Analysis

Cloud computing has gained popularity at a breakneck pace over the last few years. It has revolutionized the way businesses operate by providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for their computing needs. Cloud providers offer a range of services with a variety of pricing schemes. Cloud pricing schemes are based on functional factors like CPU, RAM, and storage, combined with different payment options, such as pay-per-use, subscription-based, and non-functional aspects, such as scalability and availability. While cloud pricing can be complicated, it is critical for businesses to thoroughly assess and compare pricing policies along with technical requirements to ensure they design an investment strategy. This paper evaluates current pricing strategies for IaaS, CaaS, and PaaS cloud services and also focuses on the three leading cloud providers, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. To compare pricing policies between different services and providers, a hedonic price index is constructed for each service type based on data collected in 2022. Using the hedonic price index, a comparative analysis between them becomes feasible. The results revealed that providers follow the very same pricing pattern for IaaS and CaaS, with CPU being the main driver of cloud pricing schemes, whereas PaaS pricing fluctuates among cloud providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Grid Computing
Journal of Grid Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grid Computing is an emerging technology that enables large-scale resource sharing and coordinated problem solving within distributed, often loosely coordinated groups-what are sometimes termed "virtual organizations. By providing scalable, secure, high-performance mechanisms for discovering and negotiating access to remote resources, Grid technologies promise to make it possible for scientific collaborations to share resources on an unprecedented scale, and for geographically distributed groups to work together in ways that were previously impossible. Similar technologies are being adopted within industry, where they serve as important building blocks for emerging service provider infrastructures. Even though the advantages of this technology for classes of applications have been acknowledged, research in a variety of disciplines, including not only multiple domains of computer science (networking, middleware, programming, algorithms) but also application disciplines themselves, as well as such areas as sociology and economics, is needed to broaden the applicability and scope of the current body of knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Complexity of Cloud Pricing Policies: A Comparative Market Analysis A Quasi-Oppositional Learning-based Fox Optimizer for QoS-aware Web Service Composition in Mobile Edge Computing WIDESim: A Toolkit for Simulating Resource Management Techniques Of Scientific Workflows in Distributed Environments with Graph Topology CMK: Enhancing Resource Usage Monitoring across Diverse Bioinformatics Workflow Management Systems Resource Utilization Based on Hybrid WOA-LOA Optimization with Credit Based Resource Aware Load Balancing and Scheduling Algorithm for Cloud Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1