比较血清前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA)、可溶性 E-cadherin (sE-cad) 和单磷酸肌苷脱氢酶-2 (IMPDH-2) 作为侵袭性前列腺癌预测指标的作用

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY African Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2
Ahmed Mohammed Umar, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi, Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Abdullah Abdulwahab-Ahmed, Abubakar Sadiq Muhammad, Abdullahi Khalid
{"title":"比较血清前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA)、可溶性 E-cadherin (sE-cad) 和单磷酸肌苷脱氢酶-2 (IMPDH-2) 作为侵袭性前列腺癌预测指标的作用","authors":"Ahmed Mohammed Umar, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi, Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Abdullah Abdulwahab-Ahmed, Abubakar Sadiq Muhammad, Abdullahi Khalid","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase-2 in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness by determining their correlations with Gleason score and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Groups. This was a hospital-based descriptive quantitative cross-sectional study whereby we enrolled 48 newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma patients in the study. Their serum was analysed for PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the serum sE-cad and Gleason score while Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used for PSA and IMPDH-2. The correlation coefficient (r) was graded as very weak (< 0.3), weak (0.3–0.4), moderate (0.5–0.6), or strong (≥ 0.7), while the magnitude was determined by calculating the coefficient of determination for the respective analysis (R2). The correlation between the biomarkers and the ISUP Grade groups was determined using the Kendall tau correlation coefficient (τ). All levels of statistical significance were set at p < 0.05. The mean age of the subjects was 69.4 years. The Means of serum PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2 were 47.2 ng/ml, 136.5 ng/ml, and 89.8 pg/ml respectively. Serum PSA weakly correlated with both Gleason score (r = 0.3, p = 0.04) and ISUP grade groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.02). The magnitude was 0.097. Similarly, serum sE-cad correlated weakly with both Gleason scores (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.005). The magnitude was 0.134. However, serum IMPDH-2 neither correlated with Gleason score (r = 0.03, p = 0.86) nor ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.004, p = 0.97). Serum sE-cad did not outperform both IMPDH-2 (p = 0.91) or PSA (p = 0.23) in predicting the Gleason score. Serum sE-cad best predicted aggressive prostate cancer but did not statistically outperform serum PSA or IMPDH-2. Hence, neither of the three are reliable predictors of aggressive prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase-2 (IMPDH-2) as aggressive prostate cancer predictors\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mohammed Umar, Ismaila Arzika Mungadi, Ngwobia Peter Agwu, Abdullah Abdulwahab-Ahmed, Abubakar Sadiq Muhammad, Abdullahi Khalid\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to compare serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase-2 in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness by determining their correlations with Gleason score and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Groups. This was a hospital-based descriptive quantitative cross-sectional study whereby we enrolled 48 newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma patients in the study. Their serum was analysed for PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the serum sE-cad and Gleason score while Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used for PSA and IMPDH-2. The correlation coefficient (r) was graded as very weak (< 0.3), weak (0.3–0.4), moderate (0.5–0.6), or strong (≥ 0.7), while the magnitude was determined by calculating the coefficient of determination for the respective analysis (R2). The correlation between the biomarkers and the ISUP Grade groups was determined using the Kendall tau correlation coefficient (τ). All levels of statistical significance were set at p < 0.05. The mean age of the subjects was 69.4 years. The Means of serum PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2 were 47.2 ng/ml, 136.5 ng/ml, and 89.8 pg/ml respectively. Serum PSA weakly correlated with both Gleason score (r = 0.3, p = 0.04) and ISUP grade groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.02). The magnitude was 0.097. Similarly, serum sE-cad correlated weakly with both Gleason scores (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.005). The magnitude was 0.134. However, serum IMPDH-2 neither correlated with Gleason score (r = 0.03, p = 0.86) nor ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.004, p = 0.97). Serum sE-cad did not outperform both IMPDH-2 (p = 0.91) or PSA (p = 0.23) in predicting the Gleason score. Serum sE-cad best predicted aggressive prostate cancer but did not statistically outperform serum PSA or IMPDH-2. Hence, neither of the three are reliable predictors of aggressive prostate cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00441-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过确定血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、可溶性E-cadherin(sE-cad)和单磷酸肌苷脱氢酶-2与格里森评分和国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级组的相关性,比较它们在预测前列腺癌侵袭性方面的作用。这是一项以医院为基础的描述性定量横断面研究,我们招募了 48 名新确诊的前列腺腺癌患者参与研究。我们对他们的血清进行了 PSA、sE-cad 和 IMPDH-2 分析。皮尔逊相关系数用于检验血清 sE-cad 与格里森评分之间的相关性,而 Spearman rho 相关系数用于检验 PSA 和 IMPDH-2 之间的相关性。相关系数(r)分为极弱(< 0.3)、弱(0.3-0.4)、中等(0.5-0.6)或强(≥ 0.7),而相关程度则通过计算相应分析的决定系数(R2)来确定。生物标志物与 ISUP 等级组之间的相关性使用 Kendall tau 相关系数 (τ) 确定。所有统计显著性水平均设定为 p <0.05。受试者的平均年龄为 69.4 岁。血清 PSA、sE-cad 和 IMPDH-2 的平均值分别为 47.2 纳克/毫升、136.5 纳克/毫升和 89.8 皮克/毫升。血清 PSA 与 Gleason 评分(r = 0.3,p = 0.04)和 ISUP 等级组(τ = 0.3,p = 0.02)均呈弱相关。大小为 0.097。同样,血清 sE-cad 与 Gleason 评分(r = 0.4,p = 0.01)和 ISUP 等级组(τ = 0.3,p = 0.005)均呈弱相关。幅度为 0.134。然而,血清 IMPDH-2 与 Gleason 评分(r = 0.03,p = 0.86)和 ISUP 等级组(τ = 0.004,p = 0.97)均无相关性。血清sE-cad在预测Gleason评分方面并不优于IMPDH-2(p = 0.91)或PSA(p = 0.23)。血清 sE-cad 最能预测侵袭性前列腺癌,但在统计学上并不优于血清 PSA 或 IMPDH-2。因此,这三者都不是侵袭性前列腺癌的可靠预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase-2 (IMPDH-2) as aggressive prostate cancer predictors
This study aimed to compare serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad), and Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase-2 in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness by determining their correlations with Gleason score and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Groups. This was a hospital-based descriptive quantitative cross-sectional study whereby we enrolled 48 newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma patients in the study. Their serum was analysed for PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the serum sE-cad and Gleason score while Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used for PSA and IMPDH-2. The correlation coefficient (r) was graded as very weak (< 0.3), weak (0.3–0.4), moderate (0.5–0.6), or strong (≥ 0.7), while the magnitude was determined by calculating the coefficient of determination for the respective analysis (R2). The correlation between the biomarkers and the ISUP Grade groups was determined using the Kendall tau correlation coefficient (τ). All levels of statistical significance were set at p < 0.05. The mean age of the subjects was 69.4 years. The Means of serum PSA, sE-cad, and IMPDH-2 were 47.2 ng/ml, 136.5 ng/ml, and 89.8 pg/ml respectively. Serum PSA weakly correlated with both Gleason score (r = 0.3, p = 0.04) and ISUP grade groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.02). The magnitude was 0.097. Similarly, serum sE-cad correlated weakly with both Gleason scores (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.3, p = 0.005). The magnitude was 0.134. However, serum IMPDH-2 neither correlated with Gleason score (r = 0.03, p = 0.86) nor ISUP Grade Groups (τ = 0.004, p = 0.97). Serum sE-cad did not outperform both IMPDH-2 (p = 0.91) or PSA (p = 0.23) in predicting the Gleason score. Serum sE-cad best predicted aggressive prostate cancer but did not statistically outperform serum PSA or IMPDH-2. Hence, neither of the three are reliable predictors of aggressive prostate cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digital rectal exam in prostate cancer screening: a critical review of the ERSPC Rotterdam study Outcome of perioperative immune enhancing nutrition in patients undergoing radical cystectomy A prospective study of the association between varicoceles and semen quality in men with infertility Comparison of combination therapy with tamsulosin and dutasteride or finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial Can the parameters of penile duplex assessment predict the success of urethroplasty?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1