带尖端附件的高性能专用套筒可克服目前冷套筒息肉切除术的缺点

Ryohei Hirose, Naohisa Yoshida, Takuma Yoshida, Hiroki Mukai, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Naoto Watanabe, Risa Bandou, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Yutaka Inada, Takaaki Murakami, Akio Yanagisawa, Hiroshi Ikegaya, Takaaki Nakaya, Yoshito Itoh
{"title":"带尖端附件的高性能专用套筒可克服目前冷套筒息肉切除术的缺点","authors":"Ryohei Hirose, Naohisa Yoshida, Takuma Yoshida, Hiroki Mukai, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Naoto Watanabe, Risa Bandou, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Yutaka Inada, Takaaki Murakami, Akio Yanagisawa, Hiroshi Ikegaya, Takaaki Nakaya, Yoshito Itoh","doi":"10.1002/admt.202401055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has the disadvantage of a lower histopathological complete resection rate (HCRR) because blunt resection using CSP‐dedicated snares (DSs) causes mucosal retraction into the sheath during capture/resection. In this study, attachments are designed to narrow the sheath tip's inner diameter from 1.8 to 1.3‒1.1 mm to prevent mucosal retraction. Eight prototype snares with different component characteristics are combined with these attachments. Additionally, product version DS with attachment (Smart Snare Cold) and existing DSs, such as Exacto Cold Snare, are prepared. For snare performance evaluation, the force required to resect (FRR) human colonic mucosa, mucosal retraction amount (MRA), and clinical data are obtained. The attachments that narrowed the inner diameter to 1.3 or 1.1 mm reduce the FRR to 74.9%−93.8% and 68.0%−84.9%, respectively, and reduce the MRA to 21.0%−35.3% and 15.1%−26.8%, respectively. Thus, the reduced inner diameter improves resection ability and prevents mucosal retraction. The clinical findings show that Smart Snare Cold has significantly higher muscularis mucosa resection rates and HCRRs than Exacto Cold Snare (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001 and <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.003, respectively). Thus, the novel DS with tip attachment improves the HCRR and overcomes the current CSP disadvantage by simultaneously improving resection ability and preventing mucosal retraction.","PeriodicalId":7200,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials & Technologies","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High‐Performance Dedicated Snares with Tip Attachments can Overcome Current Disadvantages in Cold Snare Polypectomy\",\"authors\":\"Ryohei Hirose, Naohisa Yoshida, Takuma Yoshida, Hiroki Mukai, Katsuma Yamauchi, Hajime Miyazaki, Naoto Watanabe, Risa Bandou, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Yutaka Inada, Takaaki Murakami, Akio Yanagisawa, Hiroshi Ikegaya, Takaaki Nakaya, Yoshito Itoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/admt.202401055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has the disadvantage of a lower histopathological complete resection rate (HCRR) because blunt resection using CSP‐dedicated snares (DSs) causes mucosal retraction into the sheath during capture/resection. In this study, attachments are designed to narrow the sheath tip's inner diameter from 1.8 to 1.3‒1.1 mm to prevent mucosal retraction. Eight prototype snares with different component characteristics are combined with these attachments. Additionally, product version DS with attachment (Smart Snare Cold) and existing DSs, such as Exacto Cold Snare, are prepared. For snare performance evaluation, the force required to resect (FRR) human colonic mucosa, mucosal retraction amount (MRA), and clinical data are obtained. The attachments that narrowed the inner diameter to 1.3 or 1.1 mm reduce the FRR to 74.9%−93.8% and 68.0%−84.9%, respectively, and reduce the MRA to 21.0%−35.3% and 15.1%−26.8%, respectively. Thus, the reduced inner diameter improves resection ability and prevents mucosal retraction. The clinical findings show that Smart Snare Cold has significantly higher muscularis mucosa resection rates and HCRRs than Exacto Cold Snare (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001 and <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.003, respectively). Thus, the novel DS with tip attachment improves the HCRR and overcomes the current CSP disadvantage by simultaneously improving resection ability and preventing mucosal retraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Materials & Technologies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Materials & Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202401055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials & Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202401055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冷套管息肉切除术(CSP)的缺点是组织病理学完全切除率(HCRR)较低,因为使用 CSP 专用套管(DSs)进行钝性切除时会导致粘膜回缩到鞘内。在这项研究中,附件的设计目的是将鞘尖的内径从 1.8 毫米缩小到 1.3-1.1 毫米,以防止粘膜回缩。八种具有不同组件特性的原型套环与这些附件相结合。此外,还准备了带附件的产品版本 DS(Smart Snare Cold)和现有的 DS,如 Exacto Cold Snare。为了评估蜗牛的性能,我们获得了切除人体结肠粘膜所需的力量(FRR)、粘膜回缩量(MRA)和临床数据。将内径缩小到 1.3 毫米或 1.1 毫米的套管可将 FRR 分别降低到 74.9%-93.8% 和 68.0%-84.9% ,并将 MRA 分别降低到 21.0%-35.3% 和 15.1%-26.8% 。因此,缩小的内径提高了切除能力,防止了粘膜回缩。临床结果表明,Smart Snare Cold 的粘膜肌层切除率和 HCRR 明显高于 Exacto Cold Snare(分别为 P < 0.001 和 P = 0.003)。因此,带有尖端附着物的新型 DS 可同时提高切除能力和防止粘膜回缩,从而提高 HCRR 并克服当前 CSP 的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High‐Performance Dedicated Snares with Tip Attachments can Overcome Current Disadvantages in Cold Snare Polypectomy
Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has the disadvantage of a lower histopathological complete resection rate (HCRR) because blunt resection using CSP‐dedicated snares (DSs) causes mucosal retraction into the sheath during capture/resection. In this study, attachments are designed to narrow the sheath tip's inner diameter from 1.8 to 1.3‒1.1 mm to prevent mucosal retraction. Eight prototype snares with different component characteristics are combined with these attachments. Additionally, product version DS with attachment (Smart Snare Cold) and existing DSs, such as Exacto Cold Snare, are prepared. For snare performance evaluation, the force required to resect (FRR) human colonic mucosa, mucosal retraction amount (MRA), and clinical data are obtained. The attachments that narrowed the inner diameter to 1.3 or 1.1 mm reduce the FRR to 74.9%−93.8% and 68.0%−84.9%, respectively, and reduce the MRA to 21.0%−35.3% and 15.1%−26.8%, respectively. Thus, the reduced inner diameter improves resection ability and prevents mucosal retraction. The clinical findings show that Smart Snare Cold has significantly higher muscularis mucosa resection rates and HCRRs than Exacto Cold Snare (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Thus, the novel DS with tip attachment improves the HCRR and overcomes the current CSP disadvantage by simultaneously improving resection ability and preventing mucosal retraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plasma-Generated Luminescent Coatings: Innovations in Thermal Sensitivity and Corrosion Resistance Deep-Learning-Assisted Triboelectric Whisker Sensor Array for Real-Time Motion Sensing of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Spectral Analysis on Color Detection Sharpness of Animal Vision toward Polychromatic Vision System Evaporated Copper-Based Perovskite Dynamic Memristors for Reservoir Computing Systems Hydrocarbon-Based Ionomer/PTFE-Reinforced Composite Membrane Through Multibar Coating Technique for Durable Fuel Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1