基于不同分子标记的 Euterpe edulis 遗传多样性分析

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s11295-024-01663-9
Francine Alves Nogueira de Almeida, Jônatas Gomes Santos, Aléxia Gonçalves Pereira, Guillherme Bravim Canal, Christine D. Bacon, Adésio Ferreira, Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira
{"title":"基于不同分子标记的 Euterpe edulis 遗传多样性分析","authors":"Francine Alves Nogueira de Almeida, Jônatas Gomes Santos, Aléxia Gonçalves Pereira, Guillherme Bravim Canal, Christine D. Bacon, Adésio Ferreira, Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira","doi":"10.1007/s11295-024-01663-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge of the genetic diversity and population structure of species can facilitate conservation and guide management programs. However, the type of molecular markers used can affect estimates of genetic divergence and population structure. Here three types of molecular markers were used to estimate the genetic diversity and population structure of <i>Euterpe edulis</i>, a palm endemic to the Atlantic Forest and economically and ecologically important. The objective was to estimate the parameters of genetic diversity and population structure for two other types of molecular markers (SNP and SilicoDArT) in addition to the commonly used one (SSR) to the species. We used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), SilicoDArT, and microsatellite (SSR) markers in 138 <i>E. edulis</i> individuals sampled from 15 sites. <i>Euterpe edulis</i> individuals were grouped into 11 clusters using SNPs and SilicoDArT and six groups using SSR data. The SNP and SilicoDArT data showed less divergence between the individuals within each cluster in comparison to the results derived from the SSR data. The probability of reassigning individuals to their cluster of origin revealed an average association with the original clusters was 0.92 for SNPs (<i>n</i> = 100), 0.71 for SSR (<i>n</i> = 8), and 0.99 for SilicoDArT (<i>n</i> = 445). The genetic divergence is high among sites using SNP markers, whereas SSRs showed the largest genetic divergence is found within each site. The overall heterozygosity values for each site in the eight SSR (<i>He</i> = 0.69; <i>Ho</i> = 0.59) markers were almost four times higher than those values inferred using SNPs (data 7833 SNP, <i>He</i> = 0.15; <i>Ho</i> = 0.13; data 100 SNP, <i>He</i> = 0.14; <i>Ho</i> = 0.12). Within each site, we found low inbreeding rates using both markers (SNP and SSR). In addition, population structure analysis identified two strongly supported geographical groups, one northern and one southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest group, for both markers. This study contributes to the understanding of the population genetics and population structure of <i>E. edulis</i> and may have important implications for its conservation. In addition, our results suggest that SNP and SilicoDArT markers are more effective for evaluating population structure, but SSR is more capable of detecting diversity among individuals for this species.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic diversity analysis of Euterpe edulis based on different molecular markers\",\"authors\":\"Francine Alves Nogueira de Almeida, Jônatas Gomes Santos, Aléxia Gonçalves Pereira, Guillherme Bravim Canal, Christine D. Bacon, Adésio Ferreira, Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11295-024-01663-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Knowledge of the genetic diversity and population structure of species can facilitate conservation and guide management programs. However, the type of molecular markers used can affect estimates of genetic divergence and population structure. Here three types of molecular markers were used to estimate the genetic diversity and population structure of <i>Euterpe edulis</i>, a palm endemic to the Atlantic Forest and economically and ecologically important. The objective was to estimate the parameters of genetic diversity and population structure for two other types of molecular markers (SNP and SilicoDArT) in addition to the commonly used one (SSR) to the species. We used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), SilicoDArT, and microsatellite (SSR) markers in 138 <i>E. edulis</i> individuals sampled from 15 sites. <i>Euterpe edulis</i> individuals were grouped into 11 clusters using SNPs and SilicoDArT and six groups using SSR data. The SNP and SilicoDArT data showed less divergence between the individuals within each cluster in comparison to the results derived from the SSR data. The probability of reassigning individuals to their cluster of origin revealed an average association with the original clusters was 0.92 for SNPs (<i>n</i> = 100), 0.71 for SSR (<i>n</i> = 8), and 0.99 for SilicoDArT (<i>n</i> = 445). The genetic divergence is high among sites using SNP markers, whereas SSRs showed the largest genetic divergence is found within each site. The overall heterozygosity values for each site in the eight SSR (<i>He</i> = 0.69; <i>Ho</i> = 0.59) markers were almost four times higher than those values inferred using SNPs (data 7833 SNP, <i>He</i> = 0.15; <i>Ho</i> = 0.13; data 100 SNP, <i>He</i> = 0.14; <i>Ho</i> = 0.12). Within each site, we found low inbreeding rates using both markers (SNP and SSR). In addition, population structure analysis identified two strongly supported geographical groups, one northern and one southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest group, for both markers. This study contributes to the understanding of the population genetics and population structure of <i>E. edulis</i> and may have important implications for its conservation. In addition, our results suggest that SNP and SilicoDArT markers are more effective for evaluating population structure, but SSR is more capable of detecting diversity among individuals for this species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-024-01663-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-024-01663-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解物种的遗传多样性和种群结构有助于保护和指导管理计划。然而,使用的分子标记类型会影响对遗传差异和种群结构的估计。本研究使用了三种分子标记来估计大西洋森林特有的、具有重要经济和生态价值的棕榈树 Euterpe edulis 的遗传多样性和种群结构。除了常用的分子标记(SSR)外,我们还使用了另外两种分子标记(SNP 和 SilicoDArT)来估算该物种的遗传多样性和种群结构参数。我们使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)、SilicoDArT 和微卫星(SSR)标记对从 15 个地点采样的 138 个 E. edulis 个体进行了分析。利用 SNP 和 SilicoDArT 将 Euterpe edulis 个体分为 11 个群组,利用 SSR 数据将 Euterpe edulis 个体分为 6 个群组。与 SSR 数据得出的结果相比,SNP 和 SilicoDArT 数据显示每个群组内个体之间的差异较小。将个体重新分配到原群组的概率显示,SNP(n = 100)与原群组的平均关联度为 0.92,SSR(n = 8)为 0.71,SilicoDArT(n = 445)为 0.99。使用 SNP 标记的位点间遗传差异较大,而 SSR 显示每个位点内的遗传差异最大。在 8 个 SSR 标记(He = 0.69;Ho = 0.59)中,每个位点的总体杂合度值几乎是 SNP 推断值的四倍(数据 7833 SNP,He = 0.15;Ho = 0.13;数据 100 SNP,He = 0.14;Ho = 0.12)。在每个地点,我们发现使用两种标记(SNP 和 SSR)的近交率都很低。此外,种群结构分析还发现了两个得到强烈支持的地理群体,一个是北部的巴西大西洋森林群体,另一个是南部的巴西大西洋森林群体。这项研究有助于了解 E. edulis 的种群遗传学和种群结构,并可能对其保护具有重要意义。此外,我们的研究结果表明,SNP 和 SilicoDArT 标记对评估种群结构更有效,但 SSR 更能检测该物种个体间的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genetic diversity analysis of Euterpe edulis based on different molecular markers

Knowledge of the genetic diversity and population structure of species can facilitate conservation and guide management programs. However, the type of molecular markers used can affect estimates of genetic divergence and population structure. Here three types of molecular markers were used to estimate the genetic diversity and population structure of Euterpe edulis, a palm endemic to the Atlantic Forest and economically and ecologically important. The objective was to estimate the parameters of genetic diversity and population structure for two other types of molecular markers (SNP and SilicoDArT) in addition to the commonly used one (SSR) to the species. We used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), SilicoDArT, and microsatellite (SSR) markers in 138 E. edulis individuals sampled from 15 sites. Euterpe edulis individuals were grouped into 11 clusters using SNPs and SilicoDArT and six groups using SSR data. The SNP and SilicoDArT data showed less divergence between the individuals within each cluster in comparison to the results derived from the SSR data. The probability of reassigning individuals to their cluster of origin revealed an average association with the original clusters was 0.92 for SNPs (n = 100), 0.71 for SSR (n = 8), and 0.99 for SilicoDArT (n = 445). The genetic divergence is high among sites using SNP markers, whereas SSRs showed the largest genetic divergence is found within each site. The overall heterozygosity values for each site in the eight SSR (He = 0.69; Ho = 0.59) markers were almost four times higher than those values inferred using SNPs (data 7833 SNP, He = 0.15; Ho = 0.13; data 100 SNP, He = 0.14; Ho = 0.12). Within each site, we found low inbreeding rates using both markers (SNP and SSR). In addition, population structure analysis identified two strongly supported geographical groups, one northern and one southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest group, for both markers. This study contributes to the understanding of the population genetics and population structure of E. edulis and may have important implications for its conservation. In addition, our results suggest that SNP and SilicoDArT markers are more effective for evaluating population structure, but SSR is more capable of detecting diversity among individuals for this species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1