综合初级保健和传统门诊服务中儿童精神健康治疗的可及性和保留率。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae057
Hannah L Joseph,Li Fang Zhang,Candace Best,Christina Bancroft,Madison James,Shreeti Kapoor,Christopher F Drescher,Catherine L Davis
{"title":"综合初级保健和传统门诊服务中儿童精神健康治疗的可及性和保留率。","authors":"Hannah L Joseph,Li Fang Zhang,Candace Best,Christina Bancroft,Madison James,Shreeti Kapoor,Christopher F Drescher,Catherine L Davis","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nThere are disparities in child mental health treatment access and treatment retention in terms of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance coverage. Institutions have invested in the integrated primary care (IPC) treatment model with the goal of improving treatment access and promoting child mental health equity.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study compared treatment attendance in an outpatient psychiatry clinic (OPC) versus an IPC clinic to assess whether the IPC was associated with reduced disparities in access to care and treatment retention.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study assessed whether there were differences in who is connected to care from the intake appointment to first follow-up appointment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nResults showed that the IPC clinic served a more diverse patient population than the OPC clinic in terms of SES, race, and ethnicity. Differences in treatment attendance in the IPC and OPC were also found. After controlling for race, ethnicity, insurance, and distance from patient's home zip code to clinic, the IPC treatment setting was associated with poorer intake and follow-up appointment attendance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe IPC model may be more accessible to historically underserved youth, but the treatment setting does not inherently eliminate disparities in child mental health treatment retention. Replication of this study has the potential to contribute to the external validity of study findings, improve quality assurance policies, and develop equitable workflow policies. Future research is needed to identify factors that can improve treatment attendance for populations who face greater retention barriers and to shine light on ways that healthcare systems may inadvertently maintain disparity in treatment retention.","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child mental health treatment access and retention in integrated primary care and traditional outpatient services.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah L Joseph,Li Fang Zhang,Candace Best,Christina Bancroft,Madison James,Shreeti Kapoor,Christopher F Drescher,Catherine L Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nThere are disparities in child mental health treatment access and treatment retention in terms of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance coverage. Institutions have invested in the integrated primary care (IPC) treatment model with the goal of improving treatment access and promoting child mental health equity.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study compared treatment attendance in an outpatient psychiatry clinic (OPC) versus an IPC clinic to assess whether the IPC was associated with reduced disparities in access to care and treatment retention.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis study assessed whether there were differences in who is connected to care from the intake appointment to first follow-up appointment.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nResults showed that the IPC clinic served a more diverse patient population than the OPC clinic in terms of SES, race, and ethnicity. Differences in treatment attendance in the IPC and OPC were also found. After controlling for race, ethnicity, insurance, and distance from patient's home zip code to clinic, the IPC treatment setting was associated with poorer intake and follow-up appointment attendance.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThe IPC model may be more accessible to historically underserved youth, but the treatment setting does not inherently eliminate disparities in child mental health treatment retention. Replication of this study has the potential to contribute to the external validity of study findings, improve quality assurance policies, and develop equitable workflow policies. Future research is needed to identify factors that can improve treatment attendance for populations who face greater retention barriers and to shine light on ways that healthcare systems may inadvertently maintain disparity in treatment retention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在儿童心理健康治疗的可及性和治疗的持续性方面,存在着种族、民族、社会经济地位(SES)和保险范围等方面的差异。本研究比较了精神科门诊(OPC)和综合初级护理(IPC)诊所的治疗就诊率,以评估综合初级护理是否与减少治疗就诊率和治疗保留率方面的差异有关。结果显示,就社会经济地位、种族和民族而言,IPC 诊所比 OPC 诊所服务的患者更加多样化。此外,IPC 和 OPC 的就诊率也存在差异。在控制了种族、民族、保险以及患者家庭邮编到诊所的距离后,IPC 治疗环境与较差的入院和复诊就诊率相关。本研究的复制有可能有助于提高研究结果的外部有效性、改进质量保证政策和制定公平的工作流程政策。未来的研究需要确定哪些因素可以提高面临更大治疗保留障碍的人群的治疗出席率,并揭示医疗保健系统可能在无意中维持治疗保留率差异的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Child mental health treatment access and retention in integrated primary care and traditional outpatient services.
INTRODUCTION There are disparities in child mental health treatment access and treatment retention in terms of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance coverage. Institutions have invested in the integrated primary care (IPC) treatment model with the goal of improving treatment access and promoting child mental health equity. OBJECTIVE This study compared treatment attendance in an outpatient psychiatry clinic (OPC) versus an IPC clinic to assess whether the IPC was associated with reduced disparities in access to care and treatment retention. METHODS This study assessed whether there were differences in who is connected to care from the intake appointment to first follow-up appointment. RESULTS Results showed that the IPC clinic served a more diverse patient population than the OPC clinic in terms of SES, race, and ethnicity. Differences in treatment attendance in the IPC and OPC were also found. After controlling for race, ethnicity, insurance, and distance from patient's home zip code to clinic, the IPC treatment setting was associated with poorer intake and follow-up appointment attendance. CONCLUSIONS The IPC model may be more accessible to historically underserved youth, but the treatment setting does not inherently eliminate disparities in child mental health treatment retention. Replication of this study has the potential to contribute to the external validity of study findings, improve quality assurance policies, and develop equitable workflow policies. Future research is needed to identify factors that can improve treatment attendance for populations who face greater retention barriers and to shine light on ways that healthcare systems may inadvertently maintain disparity in treatment retention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative account of mothers of pediatric heart transplant recipients' experience at a pilot mindfulness-based retreat: insights for implementation. Family communication and courageous coping in Korean adolescents and young adults: a cross-sectional study. Pilot study of a parent-based intervention for functional somatic symptoms in children. Barriers to healthy behaviors: perspectives from teens with comorbid Type 1 diabetes and overweight/obesity, caregivers, and pediatric endocrinologists. Achieving RoutIne Screening for Emotional health (ARISE) in pediatric subspecialty clinics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1