基于深度学习的 ASPECTS 算法可提高阅读性能并缩短解读时间。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY American Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3174/ajnr.a8491
Angela Ayobi,Adam Davis,Peter D Chang,Daniel S Chow,Kambiz Nael,Maxime Tassy,Sarah Quenet,Sylvain Fogola,Peter Shabe,David Fussell,Christophe Avare,Yasmina Chaibi
{"title":"基于深度学习的 ASPECTS 算法可提高阅读性能并缩短解读时间。","authors":"Angela Ayobi,Adam Davis,Peter D Chang,Daniel S Chow,Kambiz Nael,Maxime Tassy,Sarah Quenet,Sylvain Fogola,Peter Shabe,David Fussell,Christophe Avare,Yasmina Chaibi","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.a8491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\r\nASPECTS is a long-standing and well documented selection criteria for acute ischemic stroke treatment, however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with significant interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multi-reader, multi-case study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm in order to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nA total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. Reference standard was established through the consensus of three expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, eight additional clinicians (four typical ASPECTS reader and four senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI, La Ciotat, France), a DLbased FDA-cleared and CE-marked algorithm designed to automatically compute ASPECTS. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWith software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (p<0.05), and increased ROC AUC from 0.749 to 0.788 (p<0.05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, use of the algorithm improved the score-based inter-observer reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (p<0.0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (p<0.05) when aided by the algorithm.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWith the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, less variabilities and higher precision compared to the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke.\r\n\r\nABBREVIATIONS\r\nASPECTS = Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score; DL = Deep Learning; EIC = Early Ischemic Changes; ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; IS = Ischemic Stroke; ROC AUC = Receiver Operating Characteristics Area Under the Curve.","PeriodicalId":7875,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Ayobi,Adam Davis,Peter D Chang,Daniel S Chow,Kambiz Nael,Maxime Tassy,Sarah Quenet,Sylvain Fogola,Peter Shabe,David Fussell,Christophe Avare,Yasmina Chaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.a8491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\\r\\nASPECTS is a long-standing and well documented selection criteria for acute ischemic stroke treatment, however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with significant interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multi-reader, multi-case study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm in order to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nA total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. Reference standard was established through the consensus of three expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, eight additional clinicians (four typical ASPECTS reader and four senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI, La Ciotat, France), a DLbased FDA-cleared and CE-marked algorithm designed to automatically compute ASPECTS. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nWith software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (p<0.05), and increased ROC AUC from 0.749 to 0.788 (p<0.05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, use of the algorithm improved the score-based inter-observer reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (p<0.0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (p<0.05) when aided by the algorithm.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWith the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, less variabilities and higher precision compared to the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke.\\r\\n\\r\\nABBREVIATIONS\\r\\nASPECTS = Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score; DL = Deep Learning; EIC = Early Ischemic Changes; ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; IS = Ischemic Stroke; ROC AUC = Receiver Operating Characteristics Area Under the Curve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a8491\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a8491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的ASPECTS 是急性缺血性卒中治疗的一个长期存在且有据可查的选择标准,然而,ASPECTS 的判读对医生来说是一项具有挑战性且耗时的任务,观察者之间存在显著差异。我们进行了一项多阅读器、多病例研究,让阅读器在无深度学习(DL)算法支持和有深度学习算法支持的情况下评估 ASPECTS,以分析该软件对临床医生的表现和解读时间的影响。参考标准由三位可获得基线 CTA 和 CTP 数据的神经放射学专家共同制定。随后,另外八名临床医生(四名典型的 ASPECTS 阅读器和四名资深神经放射科医生)分别在没有 CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI, La Ciotat, France) 的情况下和在 CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI, La Ciotat, France) 的协助下分析了 NCCT 扫描,CINA-ASPECTS 是一种基于 DL 的、经 FDA 批准和 CE 认证的算法,旨在自动计算 ASPECTS。结果在软件辅助下,读者基于区域的准确率从 72.4% 提高到 76.5%(P<0.05),ROC AUC 从 0.749 提高到 0.788(P<0.05)。值得注意的是,使用该软件后,所有读者的 ROC AUC 都有所提高。此外,使用该算法后,基于评分的观察者间可靠性和 ASPECTS 评估的相关系数分别提高了 0.222 和 0.087(p<0.0001)。结论在算法的帮助下,读者的分析不仅更加准确,而且速度更快。此外,与参考标准相比,ASPECTS 评估的整体一致性更高、变异性更小、精确度更高。这一新型工具可使医生准确、及时地诊断急性缺血性卒中,从而提高患者选择适当治疗的能力。 ABBREVIATIONSASPECTS = Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score;DL = Deep Learning;EIC = Early Ischemic Changes;ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient;IS = Ischemic Stroke;ROC AUC = Receiver Operating Characteristics Area Under the Curve。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Learning-Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ASPECTS is a long-standing and well documented selection criteria for acute ischemic stroke treatment, however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with significant interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multi-reader, multi-case study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm in order to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. Reference standard was established through the consensus of three expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, eight additional clinicians (four typical ASPECTS reader and four senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI, La Ciotat, France), a DLbased FDA-cleared and CE-marked algorithm designed to automatically compute ASPECTS. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments. RESULTS With software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (p<0.05), and increased ROC AUC from 0.749 to 0.788 (p<0.05). Notably, all readers exhibited an improved ROC AUC when utilizing the software. Moreover, use of the algorithm improved the score-based inter-observer reliability and correlation coefficient of ASPECTS evaluation by 0.222 and 0.087 (p<0.0001), respectively. Additionally, the readers' mean time spent analyzing a case was significantly reduced by 6% (p<0.05) when aided by the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS With the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, less variabilities and higher precision compared to the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. ABBREVIATIONS ASPECTS = Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score; DL = Deep Learning; EIC = Early Ischemic Changes; ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; IS = Ischemic Stroke; ROC AUC = Receiver Operating Characteristics Area Under the Curve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
506
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The mission of AJNR is to further knowledge in all aspects of neuroimaging, head and neck imaging, and spine imaging for neuroradiologists, radiologists, trainees, scientists, and associated professionals through print and/or electronic publication of quality peer-reviewed articles that lead to the highest standards in patient care, research, and education and to promote discussion of these and other issues through its electronic activities.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Editorials in Radiology: Can Expert Editors Detect Them? The many faces of myxopapillary ependynomas. Vestibular schwannoma-related increased labyrinthine post-gadolinium 3D-FLAIR signal intensity and association with hearing impairment. CNS Embryonal Tumor with PLAGL Amplification, a New Tumor Type in Children and Adolescents: Insights from a Comprehensive MRI Analysis. DSA Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Obliteration in Cerebral AVM following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1