丙戊酸治疗蛛网膜下腔出血患者的安全性和疗效:回顾性研究

Matthew Cobler-Lichter, Kushak Suchdev, Hayley Tatro, Ava Cascone, Joanna Yang, Janice Weinberg, Mohamad K Abdalkader, Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock, Charlene J Ong, Anna Cervantes-Arslanian, David Greer, Thanh N Nguyen, Ali Daneshmand, David Y Chung
{"title":"丙戊酸治疗蛛网膜下腔出血患者的安全性和疗效:回顾性研究","authors":"Matthew Cobler-Lichter, Kushak Suchdev, Hayley Tatro, Ava Cascone, Joanna Yang, Janice Weinberg, Mohamad K Abdalkader, Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock, Charlene J Ong, Anna Cervantes-Arslanian, David Greer, Thanh N Nguyen, Ali Daneshmand, David Y Chung","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Animal studies have suggested that valproic acid (VPA) is neuroprotective in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Potential mechanisms include an effect on cortical spreading depolarizations (CSD), apoptosis, blood–brain barrier integrity, and inflammatory pathways. However, the effect of VPA on SAH outcomes in humans has not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 123 patients with nontraumatic SAH. Eighty–seven patients had an aneurysmal source and 36 patients did not have a culprit lesion identified. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the association between VPA and the following: delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), radiographic vasospasm, and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 3. Results: All 18 patients who received VPA underwent coil embolization of their aneurysm. VPA use did not have a significant association with DCI on adjusted analysis (Odds Ratio, OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.20 – 5.80). The association between VPA use and vasospasm was OR = 0.64 (0.19 – 1.98) and discharge mRS > 3 was OR = 0.45 (0.10 – 1.64). Increased age (OR = 1.04, 1.01 – 1.07) and Hunt and Hess (HH) grade > 3 (OR = 14.5, 4.31 – 48.6) were associated with an increased likelihood for poor discharge outcome (mRS > 3). Younger age (OR = 0.96, 0.93 – 0.99), mFS score = 4 (OR = 4.14, 1.81 – 9.45), and HH grade > 3 (OR = 2.92, 1.11 – 7.69) were all associated with subsequent development of radiographic vasospasm. There were no complications associated with VPA administration. Conclusion: We did not observe an association between VPA and the rate of DCI. There may have been a protective association on discharge outcome and radiographic vasospasm that did not reach statistical significance. We found that VPA use was safe and is plausible to be used in a population of SAH patients who have undergone endovascular treatment of their aneurysm. Larger, prospective studies are needed to determine the effect of VPA on outcome after SAH.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Outcomes of Valproic Acid in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Cobler-Lichter, Kushak Suchdev, Hayley Tatro, Ava Cascone, Joanna Yang, Janice Weinberg, Mohamad K Abdalkader, Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock, Charlene J Ong, Anna Cervantes-Arslanian, David Greer, Thanh N Nguyen, Ali Daneshmand, David Y Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose: Animal studies have suggested that valproic acid (VPA) is neuroprotective in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Potential mechanisms include an effect on cortical spreading depolarizations (CSD), apoptosis, blood–brain barrier integrity, and inflammatory pathways. However, the effect of VPA on SAH outcomes in humans has not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 123 patients with nontraumatic SAH. Eighty–seven patients had an aneurysmal source and 36 patients did not have a culprit lesion identified. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the association between VPA and the following: delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), radiographic vasospasm, and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 3. Results: All 18 patients who received VPA underwent coil embolization of their aneurysm. VPA use did not have a significant association with DCI on adjusted analysis (Odds Ratio, OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.20 – 5.80). The association between VPA use and vasospasm was OR = 0.64 (0.19 – 1.98) and discharge mRS > 3 was OR = 0.45 (0.10 – 1.64). Increased age (OR = 1.04, 1.01 – 1.07) and Hunt and Hess (HH) grade > 3 (OR = 14.5, 4.31 – 48.6) were associated with an increased likelihood for poor discharge outcome (mRS > 3). Younger age (OR = 0.96, 0.93 – 0.99), mFS score = 4 (OR = 4.14, 1.81 – 9.45), and HH grade > 3 (OR = 2.92, 1.11 – 7.69) were all associated with subsequent development of radiographic vasospasm. There were no complications associated with VPA administration. Conclusion: We did not observe an association between VPA and the rate of DCI. There may have been a protective association on discharge outcome and radiographic vasospasm that did not reach statistical significance. We found that VPA use was safe and is plausible to be used in a population of SAH patients who have undergone endovascular treatment of their aneurysm. Larger, prospective studies are needed to determine the effect of VPA on outcome after SAH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:动物实验表明,丙戊酸(VPA)对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)具有神经保护作用。潜在的机制包括对皮质扩散性去极化(CSD)、细胞凋亡、血脑屏障完整性和炎症通路的影响。然而,VPA 对人类 SAH 后果的影响尚未得到研究。方法:我们对 123 名非创伤性 SAH 患者进行了回顾性分析。87例患者有动脉瘤源,36例患者未发现罪魁祸首病变。我们采用逐步逻辑回归法确定了 VPA 与以下因素的关系:延迟性脑缺血(DCI)、影像学血管痉挛和出院时修改的 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分> 3:所有18名接受VPA治疗的患者都接受了动脉瘤线圈栓塞术。经调整分析,VPA的使用与DCI无明显关系(Odds Ratio, OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.20 - 5.80)。使用 VPA 与血管痉挛的相关性为 OR = 0.64(0.19 - 1.98),出院 mRS > 3 的相关性为 OR = 0.45(0.10 - 1.64)。年龄增加(OR = 1.04,1.01 - 1.07)和 Hunt and Hess(HH)分级 > 3(OR = 14.5,4.31 - 48.6)与出院结果不佳(mRS > 3)的可能性增加有关。年龄较小(OR = 0.96,0.93 - 0.99)、mFS 评分 = 4(OR = 4.14,1.81 - 9.45)和 HH 分级 > 3(OR = 2.92,1.11 - 7.69)都与随后出现放射学血管痉挛有关。使用 VPA 不会引起并发症。结论:我们没有观察到 VPA 与 DCI 发生率之间存在关联。对出院结果和放射学血管痉挛可能有保护作用,但未达到统计学意义。我们发现,VPA 的使用是安全的,可以用于接受动脉瘤血管内治疗的 SAH 患者。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确定 VPA 对 SAH 后果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Outcomes of Valproic Acid in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Study
Background and Purpose: Animal studies have suggested that valproic acid (VPA) is neuroprotective in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Potential mechanisms include an effect on cortical spreading depolarizations (CSD), apoptosis, blood–brain barrier integrity, and inflammatory pathways. However, the effect of VPA on SAH outcomes in humans has not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 123 patients with nontraumatic SAH. Eighty–seven patients had an aneurysmal source and 36 patients did not have a culprit lesion identified. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the association between VPA and the following: delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), radiographic vasospasm, and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 3. Results: All 18 patients who received VPA underwent coil embolization of their aneurysm. VPA use did not have a significant association with DCI on adjusted analysis (Odds Ratio, OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.20 – 5.80). The association between VPA use and vasospasm was OR = 0.64 (0.19 – 1.98) and discharge mRS > 3 was OR = 0.45 (0.10 – 1.64). Increased age (OR = 1.04, 1.01 – 1.07) and Hunt and Hess (HH) grade > 3 (OR = 14.5, 4.31 – 48.6) were associated with an increased likelihood for poor discharge outcome (mRS > 3). Younger age (OR = 0.96, 0.93 – 0.99), mFS score = 4 (OR = 4.14, 1.81 – 9.45), and HH grade > 3 (OR = 2.92, 1.11 – 7.69) were all associated with subsequent development of radiographic vasospasm. There were no complications associated with VPA administration. Conclusion: We did not observe an association between VPA and the rate of DCI. There may have been a protective association on discharge outcome and radiographic vasospasm that did not reach statistical significance. We found that VPA use was safe and is plausible to be used in a population of SAH patients who have undergone endovascular treatment of their aneurysm. Larger, prospective studies are needed to determine the effect of VPA on outcome after SAH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological markers of brain network connectivity and pain sensitivity distinguish low coping from high coping Veterans with persistent post-traumatic headache Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study EpiSemoLLM: A Fine-tuned Large Language Model for Epileptogenic Zone Localization Based on Seizure Semiology with a Performance Comparable to Epileptologists Selective effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic degeneration on cognition in Parkinson's disease The Relationship Between Electrodermal Activity and Cardiac Troponin in Patients with Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1