超越疼痛:利用无监督机器学习识别小纤维神经病的表型集群

Peyton J Murin, Vivian D Gao, Stefanie Geisler
{"title":"超越疼痛:利用无监督机器学习识别小纤维神经病的表型集群","authors":"Peyton J Murin, Vivian D Gao, Stefanie Geisler","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is characterized by dysfunction and loss of peripheral unmyelinated and thinly myelinated nerve fibers, resulting in a phenotype that includes varying combinations of somatosensory and dysautonomia symptoms, which can be profoundly disabling and lead to decreased quality of life. Treatment aimed mainly at pain reduction, which may not target the underlying pathophysiology, is frequently ineffective. Another impediment to the effective management of SFN may be the significant between-patient heterogeneity. Accordingly, we launched this study to gain insights into the symptomatic variability of SFN and determine if SFN patients can be sub-grouped based on clinical characteristics.\nMethods: To characterize the phenotype and investigate how patients with SFN differ from those with large fiber involvement, 105 patients with skin-biopsy proven SFN and 45 with mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN) were recruited. Using unsupervised machine learning, SFN patients were clustered based upon symptom concurrence and severity. Demographics, clinical data, symptoms, and skin biopsy- and laboratory findings were compared between the groups.\nResults: MFN- as compared to SFN patients, were more likely to be male, older, had a lower intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the ankle and more frequent abnormal immunofixation. Beyond these differences, symptom prevalence and intensities were similar in the two cohorts. SFN patients comprised three distinct phenotypic clusters, which differed significantly in symptom severity, co-occurrence, localization, and skin biopsy findings. Only one subgroup, constituting about 20% of the patient population, was characterized by intense neuropathic pain, which was always associated with several other SFN symptoms of similarly high intensities. A pauci-symptomatic cluster comprised patients who experienced few SFN symptoms, generally of low to moderate intensity. The largest cluster was characterized by intense fatigue, myalgias and subjective weakness, but lower intensities of burning pain and paresthesia. Discussion: This data-driven study introduces a new approach to subgrouping patients with SFN. Considering both neuropathic pain and pernicious symptoms beyond pain, we identified three clusters, which may be related to distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Although additional validation will be required, our findings represent a step towards stratified treatment approaches and, ultimately, personalized treatment.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond pain: Using Unsupervised Machine Learning to Identify Phenotypic Clusters of Small Fiber Neuropathy\",\"authors\":\"Peyton J Murin, Vivian D Gao, Stefanie Geisler\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is characterized by dysfunction and loss of peripheral unmyelinated and thinly myelinated nerve fibers, resulting in a phenotype that includes varying combinations of somatosensory and dysautonomia symptoms, which can be profoundly disabling and lead to decreased quality of life. Treatment aimed mainly at pain reduction, which may not target the underlying pathophysiology, is frequently ineffective. Another impediment to the effective management of SFN may be the significant between-patient heterogeneity. Accordingly, we launched this study to gain insights into the symptomatic variability of SFN and determine if SFN patients can be sub-grouped based on clinical characteristics.\\nMethods: To characterize the phenotype and investigate how patients with SFN differ from those with large fiber involvement, 105 patients with skin-biopsy proven SFN and 45 with mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN) were recruited. Using unsupervised machine learning, SFN patients were clustered based upon symptom concurrence and severity. Demographics, clinical data, symptoms, and skin biopsy- and laboratory findings were compared between the groups.\\nResults: MFN- as compared to SFN patients, were more likely to be male, older, had a lower intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the ankle and more frequent abnormal immunofixation. Beyond these differences, symptom prevalence and intensities were similar in the two cohorts. SFN patients comprised three distinct phenotypic clusters, which differed significantly in symptom severity, co-occurrence, localization, and skin biopsy findings. Only one subgroup, constituting about 20% of the patient population, was characterized by intense neuropathic pain, which was always associated with several other SFN symptoms of similarly high intensities. A pauci-symptomatic cluster comprised patients who experienced few SFN symptoms, generally of low to moderate intensity. The largest cluster was characterized by intense fatigue, myalgias and subjective weakness, but lower intensities of burning pain and paresthesia. Discussion: This data-driven study introduces a new approach to subgrouping patients with SFN. Considering both neuropathic pain and pernicious symptoms beyond pain, we identified three clusters, which may be related to distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Although additional validation will be required, our findings represent a step towards stratified treatment approaches and, ultimately, personalized treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:小纤维神经病(SFN)的特征是外周无髓鞘和薄髓鞘神经纤维的功能障碍和损失,其表型包括不同组合的躯体感觉症状和自主神经功能障碍症状,这些症状可严重致残并导致生活质量下降。主要以减轻疼痛为目的的治疗可能并不针对潜在的病理生理学,因此往往效果不佳。有效治疗 SFN 的另一个障碍可能是患者之间存在显著的异质性。因此,我们启动了这项研究,以深入了解 SFN 的症状变异性,并确定是否可以根据临床特征对 SFN 患者进行分组:为了描述表型特征并研究 SFN 患者与大纤维受累患者有何不同,我们招募了 105 名经皮肤活检证实的 SFN 患者和 45 名混合纤维神经病(MFN)患者。通过无监督机器学习,根据症状的一致性和严重程度对 SFN 患者进行分组。对两组患者的人口统计学、临床数据、症状、皮肤活检和实验室检查结果进行了比较:与 SFN 患者相比,MFN 患者更可能是男性,年龄更大,脚踝处表皮内神经纤维密度更低,免疫固定异常更频繁。除这些差异外,两组患者的症状发生率和强度相似。SFN患者由三个不同的表型群组成,它们在症状严重程度、共同发生率、定位和皮肤活检结果方面存在显著差异。只有一个亚群(约占患者总数的 20%)以剧烈的神经病理性疼痛为特征,而这种疼痛总是与其他几种同样剧烈的 SFN 症状相关联。无症状亚群由很少出现 SFN 症状的患者组成,症状强度一般为中低。最大的一组患者有强烈的疲劳感、肌痛和主观虚弱感,但灼痛和麻痹感的强度较低。讨论:这项数据驱动型研究为自发性神经痛患者的分组引入了一种新方法。考虑到神经性疼痛和疼痛以外的恶性症状,我们确定了三个群组,它们可能与不同的病理生理机制有关。虽然还需要进一步验证,但我们的研究结果代表了向分层治疗方法和最终个性化治疗迈出的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond pain: Using Unsupervised Machine Learning to Identify Phenotypic Clusters of Small Fiber Neuropathy
Background and Objectives: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is characterized by dysfunction and loss of peripheral unmyelinated and thinly myelinated nerve fibers, resulting in a phenotype that includes varying combinations of somatosensory and dysautonomia symptoms, which can be profoundly disabling and lead to decreased quality of life. Treatment aimed mainly at pain reduction, which may not target the underlying pathophysiology, is frequently ineffective. Another impediment to the effective management of SFN may be the significant between-patient heterogeneity. Accordingly, we launched this study to gain insights into the symptomatic variability of SFN and determine if SFN patients can be sub-grouped based on clinical characteristics. Methods: To characterize the phenotype and investigate how patients with SFN differ from those with large fiber involvement, 105 patients with skin-biopsy proven SFN and 45 with mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN) were recruited. Using unsupervised machine learning, SFN patients were clustered based upon symptom concurrence and severity. Demographics, clinical data, symptoms, and skin biopsy- and laboratory findings were compared between the groups. Results: MFN- as compared to SFN patients, were more likely to be male, older, had a lower intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the ankle and more frequent abnormal immunofixation. Beyond these differences, symptom prevalence and intensities were similar in the two cohorts. SFN patients comprised three distinct phenotypic clusters, which differed significantly in symptom severity, co-occurrence, localization, and skin biopsy findings. Only one subgroup, constituting about 20% of the patient population, was characterized by intense neuropathic pain, which was always associated with several other SFN symptoms of similarly high intensities. A pauci-symptomatic cluster comprised patients who experienced few SFN symptoms, generally of low to moderate intensity. The largest cluster was characterized by intense fatigue, myalgias and subjective weakness, but lower intensities of burning pain and paresthesia. Discussion: This data-driven study introduces a new approach to subgrouping patients with SFN. Considering both neuropathic pain and pernicious symptoms beyond pain, we identified three clusters, which may be related to distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Although additional validation will be required, our findings represent a step towards stratified treatment approaches and, ultimately, personalized treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological markers of brain network connectivity and pain sensitivity distinguish low coping from high coping Veterans with persistent post-traumatic headache Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study EpiSemoLLM: A Fine-tuned Large Language Model for Epileptogenic Zone Localization Based on Seizure Semiology with a Performance Comparable to Epileptologists Selective effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic degeneration on cognition in Parkinson's disease The Relationship Between Electrodermal Activity and Cardiac Troponin in Patients with Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1