Raimundo Leonardo Lima de Oliveira, Mila Façanha Gomes, Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior, Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira, Débora Cristina Castellani, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Steel Silva Vasconcelos
{"title":"与亚马逊地区的单一种植相比,油棕榈树农林系统在土壤聚集体中储存了更多的碳和氮","authors":"Raimundo Leonardo Lima de Oliveira, Mila Façanha Gomes, Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior, Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira, Débora Cristina Castellani, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Steel Silva Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agroforestry systems (AFSs) are known to store more carbon and nitrogen in the soil when compared with monocultures. However, studies involving carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates in oil palm plantations, an important global commodity, in AFSs and monocultures are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine whether oil palm AFSs are able to store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than when planted in monoculture. We collected soil samples in the 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm layers in an oil palm AFS (10 years old) and in an oil palm monoculture (9 years old) in Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon, Brazil. We determined soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen contents in macro and microaggregates, and root biomass. Overall, more carbon was stored in the macroaggregates than in the microaggregates in the oil palm plantations. The carbon storage was higher in macro and microaggregates in the AFSs (macro: 12.97 ± 0.35 and micro: 0.53 ± 0.01) than in the monoculture (macro: 11.60 ± 0.19 e micro: 0.29 ± 0.01) in the 0–10 cm layer of the soil. The total soil carbon stock in the 0–30 cm layer was higher in the AFSs (38.08 ± 0.13 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than in the monoculture (31.79 ± 1.23 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). The AFSs showed a trend towards greater aggregate stability (range throughout the soil profile 4.70 ± 0.07 to 3.31 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the monoculture (4.71 ± 0.02 to 2.71 ± 0.23 mm). Therefore, oil palm AFSs have a greater potential to store carbon in soil aggregates and, consequently, contribute more to climate change mitigation than oil palm monocultures. As such, our results have important implications for the sustainable cultivation and exploitation of the oil palm in the Amazon and in other regions of the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oil palm agroforestry systems store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than monoculture in the Amazon\",\"authors\":\"Raimundo Leonardo Lima de Oliveira, Mila Façanha Gomes, Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior, Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira, Débora Cristina Castellani, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Steel Silva Vasconcelos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Agroforestry systems (AFSs) are known to store more carbon and nitrogen in the soil when compared with monocultures. However, studies involving carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates in oil palm plantations, an important global commodity, in AFSs and monocultures are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine whether oil palm AFSs are able to store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than when planted in monoculture. We collected soil samples in the 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm layers in an oil palm AFS (10 years old) and in an oil palm monoculture (9 years old) in Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon, Brazil. We determined soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen contents in macro and microaggregates, and root biomass. Overall, more carbon was stored in the macroaggregates than in the microaggregates in the oil palm plantations. The carbon storage was higher in macro and microaggregates in the AFSs (macro: 12.97 ± 0.35 and micro: 0.53 ± 0.01) than in the monoculture (macro: 11.60 ± 0.19 e micro: 0.29 ± 0.01) in the 0–10 cm layer of the soil. The total soil carbon stock in the 0–30 cm layer was higher in the AFSs (38.08 ± 0.13 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than in the monoculture (31.79 ± 1.23 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). The AFSs showed a trend towards greater aggregate stability (range throughout the soil profile 4.70 ± 0.07 to 3.31 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the monoculture (4.71 ± 0.02 to 2.71 ± 0.23 mm). Therefore, oil palm AFSs have a greater potential to store carbon in soil aggregates and, consequently, contribute more to climate change mitigation than oil palm monocultures. As such, our results have important implications for the sustainable cultivation and exploitation of the oil palm in the Amazon and in other regions of the world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oil palm agroforestry systems store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than monoculture in the Amazon
Agroforestry systems (AFSs) are known to store more carbon and nitrogen in the soil when compared with monocultures. However, studies involving carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates in oil palm plantations, an important global commodity, in AFSs and monocultures are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine whether oil palm AFSs are able to store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than when planted in monoculture. We collected soil samples in the 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm layers in an oil palm AFS (10 years old) and in an oil palm monoculture (9 years old) in Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon, Brazil. We determined soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen contents in macro and microaggregates, and root biomass. Overall, more carbon was stored in the macroaggregates than in the microaggregates in the oil palm plantations. The carbon storage was higher in macro and microaggregates in the AFSs (macro: 12.97 ± 0.35 and micro: 0.53 ± 0.01) than in the monoculture (macro: 11.60 ± 0.19 e micro: 0.29 ± 0.01) in the 0–10 cm layer of the soil. The total soil carbon stock in the 0–30 cm layer was higher in the AFSs (38.08 ± 0.13 Mg ha−1) than in the monoculture (31.79 ± 1.23 Mg ha−1). The AFSs showed a trend towards greater aggregate stability (range throughout the soil profile 4.70 ± 0.07 to 3.31 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the monoculture (4.71 ± 0.02 to 2.71 ± 0.23 mm). Therefore, oil palm AFSs have a greater potential to store carbon in soil aggregates and, consequently, contribute more to climate change mitigation than oil palm monocultures. As such, our results have important implications for the sustainable cultivation and exploitation of the oil palm in the Amazon and in other regions of the world.
期刊介绍:
The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management.
Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.