用于排放控制的静电电池(ESBEC):进一步开发和测试柴油机排放

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Engine Research Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1177/14680874241274039
Taewon T. Han, Gediminas Mainelis
{"title":"用于排放控制的静电电池(ESBEC):进一步开发和测试柴油机排放","authors":"Taewon T. Han, Gediminas Mainelis","doi":"10.1177/14680874241274039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We recently developed a novel diesel emissions control device, Electrostatic Screen Battery for Emissions Control (ESBEC), where an electrostatic mechanism removes diesel exhaust particles onto metal screens. In this study, we made the following improvements to the initial ESBEC’s design: (1) used metal collection screens of different porosity for a more even distribution of captured diesel exhaust throughout ESBEC, (2) redesigned screen holders for easy assembly of ESBEC, (3) heat-resistant materials were used to build the current model, which is 3 in. in diameter and 4 in. in length. ESBEC was investigated in a laboratory to optimize the screen porosity and configuration. Then, in the field, it was challenged with diesel particulate matter (DPM) exhausted from a diesel electric power generator. The DPM mass concentrations produced by the generator varied from 38 to 187 mg/m<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>, and air flow rates passing through ESBEC varied from 219 to 410 L/min. The testing was intermittently performed over 49 h. In addition, ESBEC’s particle collection efficiency was compared to that of a traditional diesel particulate filter (DPF). We also explored various washing methods to effectively remove DPM captured by ESBEC. When challenged with DPM, ESBEC showed collection efficiency of ∼100% for 26 h, during which 60 g of DPM was captured. For comparison, the collection efficiency of DPF was ∼77%. After the total run time of 46 h, the collection efficiency of ESBEC decreased to CARB (California Air Resources Board) Level 3 (85%), with 102 g DPM accumulated. When ESBEC was operated beyond 46 h, its collection efficiency was &lt;85%. However, washing screens for 5 min in isopropyl alcohol restored the collection efficiency to 86%. Future studies will examine the performance of ESBEC when it is installed in an actual diesel-powered vehicle.","PeriodicalId":14034,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrostatic battery for emissions control (ESBEC): Further development and testing with diesel emissions\",\"authors\":\"Taewon T. Han, Gediminas Mainelis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14680874241274039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We recently developed a novel diesel emissions control device, Electrostatic Screen Battery for Emissions Control (ESBEC), where an electrostatic mechanism removes diesel exhaust particles onto metal screens. In this study, we made the following improvements to the initial ESBEC’s design: (1) used metal collection screens of different porosity for a more even distribution of captured diesel exhaust throughout ESBEC, (2) redesigned screen holders for easy assembly of ESBEC, (3) heat-resistant materials were used to build the current model, which is 3 in. in diameter and 4 in. in length. ESBEC was investigated in a laboratory to optimize the screen porosity and configuration. Then, in the field, it was challenged with diesel particulate matter (DPM) exhausted from a diesel electric power generator. The DPM mass concentrations produced by the generator varied from 38 to 187 mg/m<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>, and air flow rates passing through ESBEC varied from 219 to 410 L/min. The testing was intermittently performed over 49 h. In addition, ESBEC’s particle collection efficiency was compared to that of a traditional diesel particulate filter (DPF). We also explored various washing methods to effectively remove DPM captured by ESBEC. When challenged with DPM, ESBEC showed collection efficiency of ∼100% for 26 h, during which 60 g of DPM was captured. For comparison, the collection efficiency of DPF was ∼77%. After the total run time of 46 h, the collection efficiency of ESBEC decreased to CARB (California Air Resources Board) Level 3 (85%), with 102 g DPM accumulated. When ESBEC was operated beyond 46 h, its collection efficiency was &lt;85%. However, washing screens for 5 min in isopropyl alcohol restored the collection efficiency to 86%. Future studies will examine the performance of ESBEC when it is installed in an actual diesel-powered vehicle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874241274039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engine Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874241274039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们最近开发了一种新型柴油机排放控制装置--排放控制静电屏电池(ESBEC),通过静电机制将柴油机废气颗粒清除到金属网上。在这项研究中,我们对最初的 ESBEC 设计进行了以下改进:(1) 使用不同孔隙率的金属收集滤网,使捕获的柴油废气更均匀地分布在整个 ESBEC 中;(2) 重新设计滤网支架,便于 ESBEC 的组装;(3) 使用耐热材料制造当前的模型,直径为 3 英寸,长度为 4 英寸。在实验室中对 ESBEC 进行了研究,以优化筛网的孔隙率和配置。然后,在现场用柴油发电机排出的柴油微粒物质(DPM)对其进行挑战。发电机产生的 DPM 质量浓度从 38 mg/m3 到 187 mg/m3 不等,通过 ESBEC 的空气流速从 219 L/min 到 410 L/min 不等。此外,我们还将 ESBEC 的颗粒收集效率与传统的柴油微粒过滤器 (DPF) 进行了比较。我们还探索了各种清洗方法,以有效去除 ESBEC 捕获的 DPM。当受到 DPM 的挑战时,ESBEC 在 26 小时内的收集效率为 100%,在此期间捕获了 60 克 DPM。相比之下,DPF 的收集效率为 77%。在总运行时间达到 46 小时后,ESBEC 的收集效率下降到 CARB(加利福尼亚空气资源委员会)3 级(85%),累积了 102 克 DPM。ESBEC 运行超过 46 小时后,其收集效率仍为 85%。不过,在异丙醇中清洗滤网 5 分钟后,收集效率恢复到 86%。今后的研究将考察 ESBEC 安装在实际柴油动力汽车中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electrostatic battery for emissions control (ESBEC): Further development and testing with diesel emissions
We recently developed a novel diesel emissions control device, Electrostatic Screen Battery for Emissions Control (ESBEC), where an electrostatic mechanism removes diesel exhaust particles onto metal screens. In this study, we made the following improvements to the initial ESBEC’s design: (1) used metal collection screens of different porosity for a more even distribution of captured diesel exhaust throughout ESBEC, (2) redesigned screen holders for easy assembly of ESBEC, (3) heat-resistant materials were used to build the current model, which is 3 in. in diameter and 4 in. in length. ESBEC was investigated in a laboratory to optimize the screen porosity and configuration. Then, in the field, it was challenged with diesel particulate matter (DPM) exhausted from a diesel electric power generator. The DPM mass concentrations produced by the generator varied from 38 to 187 mg/m3, and air flow rates passing through ESBEC varied from 219 to 410 L/min. The testing was intermittently performed over 49 h. In addition, ESBEC’s particle collection efficiency was compared to that of a traditional diesel particulate filter (DPF). We also explored various washing methods to effectively remove DPM captured by ESBEC. When challenged with DPM, ESBEC showed collection efficiency of ∼100% for 26 h, during which 60 g of DPM was captured. For comparison, the collection efficiency of DPF was ∼77%. After the total run time of 46 h, the collection efficiency of ESBEC decreased to CARB (California Air Resources Board) Level 3 (85%), with 102 g DPM accumulated. When ESBEC was operated beyond 46 h, its collection efficiency was <85%. However, washing screens for 5 min in isopropyl alcohol restored the collection efficiency to 86%. Future studies will examine the performance of ESBEC when it is installed in an actual diesel-powered vehicle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Engine Research
International Journal of Engine Research 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engine Research publishes high quality papers on experimental and analytical studies of engine technology.
期刊最新文献
Electrostatic battery for emissions control (ESBEC): Further development and testing with diesel emissions Collaborative effects of fuel properties and EGR on the efficiency improvement and load boundary extension of a medium-duty engine Wastegate control strategy in electrically assisted turbochargers: A formula student car case study The loosening mechanism of tin-bronze bushing assembled by interference at connecting rod small end of heavy-duty diesel engines Development of a control-oriented physical model for cylinder pressure peak estimation in SI engines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1