Justin Janquart, David Keitel, Rico K. L. Lo, Juno C. L. Chan, Jose Marìa Ezquiaga, Otto A. Hannuksela, Alvin K. Y. Li, Anupreeta More, Hemantakumar Phurailatpam, Neha Singh, Laura E. Uronen, Mick Wright, Naresh Adhikari, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Tomasz Bulik, Amanda M. Farah, Anna Heffernan, Prathamesh Joshi, Vincent Juste, Atul Kedia, Shania A. Nichols, Geraint Pratten, C. Rawcliffe, Soumen Roy, Elise M. Sänger, Hui Tong, M. Trevor, Luka Vujeva, Michael Zevin
{"title":"GW230529 的本质是什么?引力透镜假说探讨","authors":"Justin Janquart, David Keitel, Rico K. L. Lo, Juno C. L. Chan, Jose Marìa Ezquiaga, Otto A. Hannuksela, Alvin K. Y. Li, Anupreeta More, Hemantakumar Phurailatpam, Neha Singh, Laura E. Uronen, Mick Wright, Naresh Adhikari, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Tomasz Bulik, Amanda M. Farah, Anna Heffernan, Prathamesh Joshi, Vincent Juste, Atul Kedia, Shania A. Nichols, Geraint Pratten, C. Rawcliffe, Soumen Roy, Elise M. Sänger, Hui Tong, M. Trevor, Luka Vujeva, Michael Zevin","doi":"arxiv-2409.07298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the 29th of May 2023, the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration observed a\ncompact binary coalescence event consistent with a neutron star-black hole\nmerger, though the heavier object of mass 2.5-4.5 $M_\\odot$ would fall into the\npurported lower mass gap. An alternative explanation for apparent observations\nof events in this mass range has been suggested as strongly gravitationally\nlensed binary neutron stars. In this scenario, magnification would lead to the\nsource appearing closer and heavier than it really is. Here, we investigate the\nchances and possible consequences for the GW230529 event to be gravitationally\nlensed. We find this would require high magnifications and we obtain low rates\nfor observing such an event, with a relative fraction of lensed versus unlensed\nobserved events of $2 \\times 10^{-3}$ at most. When comparing the lensed and\nunlensed hypotheses accounting for the latest rates and population model, we\nfind a 1/58 chance of lensing, disfavoring this option. Moreover, when the\nmagnification is assumed to be strong enough to bring the mass of the heavier\nbinary component below the standard limits on neutron star masses, we find high\nprobability for the lighter object to have a sub-solar mass, making the binary\neven more exotic than a mass-gap neutron star-black hole system. Even when the\nsecondary is not sub-solar, its tidal deformability would likely be measurable,\nwhich is not the case for GW230529. Finally, we do not find evidence for extra\nlensing signatures such as the arrival of additional lensed images, type-II\nimage dephasing, or microlensing. Therefore, we conclude it is unlikely for\nGW230529 to be a strongly gravitationally lensed binary neutron star signal.","PeriodicalId":501041,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the nature of GW230529? An exploration of the gravitational lensing hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Justin Janquart, David Keitel, Rico K. L. Lo, Juno C. L. Chan, Jose Marìa Ezquiaga, Otto A. Hannuksela, Alvin K. Y. Li, Anupreeta More, Hemantakumar Phurailatpam, Neha Singh, Laura E. Uronen, Mick Wright, Naresh Adhikari, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Tomasz Bulik, Amanda M. Farah, Anna Heffernan, Prathamesh Joshi, Vincent Juste, Atul Kedia, Shania A. Nichols, Geraint Pratten, C. Rawcliffe, Soumen Roy, Elise M. Sänger, Hui Tong, M. Trevor, Luka Vujeva, Michael Zevin\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the 29th of May 2023, the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration observed a\\ncompact binary coalescence event consistent with a neutron star-black hole\\nmerger, though the heavier object of mass 2.5-4.5 $M_\\\\odot$ would fall into the\\npurported lower mass gap. An alternative explanation for apparent observations\\nof events in this mass range has been suggested as strongly gravitationally\\nlensed binary neutron stars. In this scenario, magnification would lead to the\\nsource appearing closer and heavier than it really is. Here, we investigate the\\nchances and possible consequences for the GW230529 event to be gravitationally\\nlensed. We find this would require high magnifications and we obtain low rates\\nfor observing such an event, with a relative fraction of lensed versus unlensed\\nobserved events of $2 \\\\times 10^{-3}$ at most. When comparing the lensed and\\nunlensed hypotheses accounting for the latest rates and population model, we\\nfind a 1/58 chance of lensing, disfavoring this option. Moreover, when the\\nmagnification is assumed to be strong enough to bring the mass of the heavier\\nbinary component below the standard limits on neutron star masses, we find high\\nprobability for the lighter object to have a sub-solar mass, making the binary\\neven more exotic than a mass-gap neutron star-black hole system. Even when the\\nsecondary is not sub-solar, its tidal deformability would likely be measurable,\\nwhich is not the case for GW230529. Finally, we do not find evidence for extra\\nlensing signatures such as the arrival of additional lensed images, type-II\\nimage dephasing, or microlensing. Therefore, we conclude it is unlikely for\\nGW230529 to be a strongly gravitationally lensed binary neutron star signal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the nature of GW230529? An exploration of the gravitational lensing hypothesis
On the 29th of May 2023, the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration observed a
compact binary coalescence event consistent with a neutron star-black hole
merger, though the heavier object of mass 2.5-4.5 $M_\odot$ would fall into the
purported lower mass gap. An alternative explanation for apparent observations
of events in this mass range has been suggested as strongly gravitationally
lensed binary neutron stars. In this scenario, magnification would lead to the
source appearing closer and heavier than it really is. Here, we investigate the
chances and possible consequences for the GW230529 event to be gravitationally
lensed. We find this would require high magnifications and we obtain low rates
for observing such an event, with a relative fraction of lensed versus unlensed
observed events of $2 \times 10^{-3}$ at most. When comparing the lensed and
unlensed hypotheses accounting for the latest rates and population model, we
find a 1/58 chance of lensing, disfavoring this option. Moreover, when the
magnification is assumed to be strong enough to bring the mass of the heavier
binary component below the standard limits on neutron star masses, we find high
probability for the lighter object to have a sub-solar mass, making the binary
even more exotic than a mass-gap neutron star-black hole system. Even when the
secondary is not sub-solar, its tidal deformability would likely be measurable,
which is not the case for GW230529. Finally, we do not find evidence for extra
lensing signatures such as the arrival of additional lensed images, type-II
image dephasing, or microlensing. Therefore, we conclude it is unlikely for
GW230529 to be a strongly gravitationally lensed binary neutron star signal.