以雨水收集、农林业和畜牧业为基础的小农雨养综合耕作系统提供的生态系统服务

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s10457-024-01055-x
D. R. Palsaniya, Sunil Kumar, M. M. Das, T. Kiran Kumar, Manoj Chaudhary, Khem Chand, S. K. Rai, Akram Ahmed, Sunil Kumar, C. S. Sahay
{"title":"以雨水收集、农林业和畜牧业为基础的小农雨养综合耕作系统提供的生态系统服务","authors":"D. R. Palsaniya,&nbsp;Sunil Kumar,&nbsp;M. M. Das,&nbsp;T. Kiran Kumar,&nbsp;Manoj Chaudhary,&nbsp;Khem Chand,&nbsp;S. K. Rai,&nbsp;Akram Ahmed,&nbsp;Sunil Kumar,&nbsp;C. S. Sahay","doi":"10.1007/s10457-024-01055-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring double cropping, securing livelihood and restoring ecosystem are the major challenges under rain-fed smallholder farming situation. A study was undertaken during 2013–2021 for smallholders through integrating rain water harvesting, crops, trees and livestock to estimate the multiple benefits to farmers and ecosystem under rain-fed situation. One hectare rain-fed integrated farming system (IFS) model comprising of farm pond, food crops, fodder crops, agrihortipasture, silvipasture, boundary plantation and livestock was evaluated on-station for various ecosystem services potential (provisioning, supporting, regulating and cultural) and also promoted on-farm. The smallholder rain-fed integrated farming system (IFS) produced total 5926 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> chickpea equivalent yield and multiple provisioning services including grains, fruits, straw, green fodder, milk, meat, fuel-wood, etc. The model recorded 1327.4 US$ ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> net returns with 1.6 benefit cost ratio and resulted round-the-year supply of income (US$ 141 to 509 every month) to the farmer. It generated 204 man-days ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> employment. The regulating services resulted from the IFS were improved soil fertility (39 and 22% more soil organic carbon in 0–15 and 15–30 cm soil layer, respectively), better infiltration rate, higher carbon stock (31.5%) with 1.36 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>carbon sequestration rate. The rain-fed IFS provided supporting ecosystem services in the form of improved soil biodiversity (earthworm and microbial count) and nutrient (41.4 kg N, 18.7 kg P and 33.2 kg K ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and by-product recycling [8.16 tonnes farmyard manure (FYM) and 1.13 tonnes farm-compost] besides providing many cultural services. The results highlighted that synergistic integration of rain water harvesting-crops-trees-livestock provides multiple ecosystem services and benefits that leads to sustainable food systems under rain-fed agro-ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"98 7","pages":"2617 - 2632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem services from rain water harvesting, agroforestry and livestock based smallholder rain-fed integrated farming system\",\"authors\":\"D. R. Palsaniya,&nbsp;Sunil Kumar,&nbsp;M. M. Das,&nbsp;T. Kiran Kumar,&nbsp;Manoj Chaudhary,&nbsp;Khem Chand,&nbsp;S. K. Rai,&nbsp;Akram Ahmed,&nbsp;Sunil Kumar,&nbsp;C. S. Sahay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-024-01055-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring double cropping, securing livelihood and restoring ecosystem are the major challenges under rain-fed smallholder farming situation. A study was undertaken during 2013–2021 for smallholders through integrating rain water harvesting, crops, trees and livestock to estimate the multiple benefits to farmers and ecosystem under rain-fed situation. One hectare rain-fed integrated farming system (IFS) model comprising of farm pond, food crops, fodder crops, agrihortipasture, silvipasture, boundary plantation and livestock was evaluated on-station for various ecosystem services potential (provisioning, supporting, regulating and cultural) and also promoted on-farm. The smallholder rain-fed integrated farming system (IFS) produced total 5926 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> chickpea equivalent yield and multiple provisioning services including grains, fruits, straw, green fodder, milk, meat, fuel-wood, etc. The model recorded 1327.4 US$ ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> net returns with 1.6 benefit cost ratio and resulted round-the-year supply of income (US$ 141 to 509 every month) to the farmer. It generated 204 man-days ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> employment. The regulating services resulted from the IFS were improved soil fertility (39 and 22% more soil organic carbon in 0–15 and 15–30 cm soil layer, respectively), better infiltration rate, higher carbon stock (31.5%) with 1.36 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>carbon sequestration rate. The rain-fed IFS provided supporting ecosystem services in the form of improved soil biodiversity (earthworm and microbial count) and nutrient (41.4 kg N, 18.7 kg P and 33.2 kg K ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and by-product recycling [8.16 tonnes farmyard manure (FYM) and 1.13 tonnes farm-compost] besides providing many cultural services. The results highlighted that synergistic integration of rain water harvesting-crops-trees-livestock provides multiple ecosystem services and benefits that leads to sustainable food systems under rain-fed agro-ecosystems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"98 7\",\"pages\":\"2617 - 2632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01055-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-024-01055-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保双季种植、保障生计和恢复生态系统是雨水灌溉小农农业面临的主要挑战。在 2013-2021 年期间,通过整合雨水收集、作物、树木和牲畜,为小农开展了一项研究,以估算在雨水灌溉条件下农民和生态系统的多重效益。对一公顷雨水灌溉综合耕作系统(IFS)模型进行了现场评估,该模型由农场池塘、粮食作物、饲料作物、农用草场、造林草场、边界种植园和牲畜组成,评估了各种生态系统服务的潜力(提供、支持、调节和文化),并在农场进行了推广。小农雨水灌溉综合耕作系统(IFS)的鹰嘴豆当量总产量为每公顷 5926 千克,并提供多种服务,包括谷物、水果、秸秆、青饲料、牛奶、肉类、薪材等。该模式每年每公顷净收益为 1327.4 美元,效益成本比为 1.6,全年为农民提供收入(每月 141 至 509 美元)。它还创造了 204 人/公顷/年-1 的就业机会。综合节水灌溉系统提供的调节服务包括提高土壤肥力(0-15 厘米土层和 15-30 厘米土层的土壤有机碳分别增加 39% 和 22%)、改善渗透率、提高碳储量(31.5%)和 1.36 兆克/公顷-年-1 的固碳率。雨水灌溉综合农作系统除了提供许多文化服务外,还以改善土壤生物多样性(蚯蚓和微生物数量)和养分(每年每公顷 41.4 千克氮、18.7 千克磷和 33.2 千克钾)以及副产品循环利用[8.16 吨农家肥和 1.13 吨农家堆肥]的形式提供辅助生态系统服务。研究结果突出表明,雨水收集-作物-树木-牲畜的协同整合提供了多种生态系统服务和效益,从而实现了雨水灌溉农业生态系统下的可持续粮食系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecosystem services from rain water harvesting, agroforestry and livestock based smallholder rain-fed integrated farming system

Ensuring double cropping, securing livelihood and restoring ecosystem are the major challenges under rain-fed smallholder farming situation. A study was undertaken during 2013–2021 for smallholders through integrating rain water harvesting, crops, trees and livestock to estimate the multiple benefits to farmers and ecosystem under rain-fed situation. One hectare rain-fed integrated farming system (IFS) model comprising of farm pond, food crops, fodder crops, agrihortipasture, silvipasture, boundary plantation and livestock was evaluated on-station for various ecosystem services potential (provisioning, supporting, regulating and cultural) and also promoted on-farm. The smallholder rain-fed integrated farming system (IFS) produced total 5926 kg ha−1 chickpea equivalent yield and multiple provisioning services including grains, fruits, straw, green fodder, milk, meat, fuel-wood, etc. The model recorded 1327.4 US$ ha−1 year−1 net returns with 1.6 benefit cost ratio and resulted round-the-year supply of income (US$ 141 to 509 every month) to the farmer. It generated 204 man-days ha−1 year−1 employment. The regulating services resulted from the IFS were improved soil fertility (39 and 22% more soil organic carbon in 0–15 and 15–30 cm soil layer, respectively), better infiltration rate, higher carbon stock (31.5%) with 1.36 Mg ha−1 year−1carbon sequestration rate. The rain-fed IFS provided supporting ecosystem services in the form of improved soil biodiversity (earthworm and microbial count) and nutrient (41.4 kg N, 18.7 kg P and 33.2 kg K ha−1 year−1) and by-product recycling [8.16 tonnes farmyard manure (FYM) and 1.13 tonnes farm-compost] besides providing many cultural services. The results highlighted that synergistic integration of rain water harvesting-crops-trees-livestock provides multiple ecosystem services and benefits that leads to sustainable food systems under rain-fed agro-ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Current trends in silvopastoral systems Correction: Botanical composition gradients in silvopastoral systems on temperate native grasslands of Uruguay Correction: Silvopastoral transitions in Latin America: toward diverse perennial systems Designing silvopastoral systems: a simulation model approach Silvopastoral systems as a strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heat stress on productivity of beef cows grazing natural grassland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1