软驱逐:当校本支持不够时会发生什么?

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL School Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1007/s12310-024-09683-5
Diana Hoffstein-Rahmey, Keri Giordano, Kayla M. Murphy, Rashel Reizin-Friedman, Amanda Coyne
{"title":"软驱逐:当校本支持不够时会发生什么?","authors":"Diana Hoffstein-Rahmey, Keri Giordano, Kayla M. Murphy, Rashel Reizin-Friedman, Amanda Coyne","doi":"10.1007/s12310-024-09683-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Very limited research exists regarding the beliefs and practices of student support teams (SSTs), sometimes called child study teams or IEP teams, in settings with non-expulsion policies for young children with severely challenging behaviors. Previous research examined teacher and administrator beliefs and practices and found that they engage in practices related to soft expulsion (Murphy et al. in Child Youth Serv Rev 158:107441, 2024). Some school psychologists and SST members may also resort to soft expulsion, subtly pushing children out of their schools due to challenging behaviors (Zinsser et al. in Rev Educ Res 92(5):743–785, 2022). This study utilized an anonymous, online, self-report measure to investigate the practices and beliefs of SST members in early childhood education settings with non-expulsion policies. Participants included 108 school-based service providers in one state. The majority identified as school psychologists, held a Master’s degree, had between 1 and 5 years of experience, and worked 36–40 h per week. Results showed that most participants said they had the supports to meet the needs of children with severely challenging behaviors, yet most had worked with a child whose behaviors they were unable to manage. Our examination also uncovered indications of soft expulsion practices and a general lack of knowledge about existing non-expulsion policies. The implications arising from these beliefs and practices are examined and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51538,"journal":{"name":"School Mental Health","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soft Expulsion: What Happens When School-Based Supports aren’t Enough\",\"authors\":\"Diana Hoffstein-Rahmey, Keri Giordano, Kayla M. Murphy, Rashel Reizin-Friedman, Amanda Coyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12310-024-09683-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Very limited research exists regarding the beliefs and practices of student support teams (SSTs), sometimes called child study teams or IEP teams, in settings with non-expulsion policies for young children with severely challenging behaviors. Previous research examined teacher and administrator beliefs and practices and found that they engage in practices related to soft expulsion (Murphy et al. in Child Youth Serv Rev 158:107441, 2024). Some school psychologists and SST members may also resort to soft expulsion, subtly pushing children out of their schools due to challenging behaviors (Zinsser et al. in Rev Educ Res 92(5):743–785, 2022). This study utilized an anonymous, online, self-report measure to investigate the practices and beliefs of SST members in early childhood education settings with non-expulsion policies. Participants included 108 school-based service providers in one state. The majority identified as school psychologists, held a Master’s degree, had between 1 and 5 years of experience, and worked 36–40 h per week. Results showed that most participants said they had the supports to meet the needs of children with severely challenging behaviors, yet most had worked with a child whose behaviors they were unable to manage. Our examination also uncovered indications of soft expulsion practices and a general lack of knowledge about existing non-expulsion policies. The implications arising from these beliefs and practices are examined and discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09683-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09683-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对有严重挑战行为的幼儿采取非驱逐政策的环境中,有关学生支持小组(SST)(有时也称为儿童研究小组或 IEP 小组)的理念和实践的研究非常有限。以前的研究考察了教师和管理人员的信念和做法,发现他们的做法与软驱逐有关(Murphy 等,载于 Child Youth Serv Rev 158:107441,2024)。一些学校心理学家和特殊教育小组成员也可能采用软驱逐的方式,巧妙地将有挑战行为的儿童推出校门(Zinsser 等人,发表于 Rev Educ Res 92(5):743-785,2022)。本研究采用匿名、在线、自我报告的方式,调查了在实行非驱逐政策的幼儿教育环境中,校内服务小组成员的做法和信念。参与者包括一个州的 108 名校本服务提供者。大多数人认为自己是学校心理学家,拥有硕士学位,有 1 到 5 年的工作经验,每周工作 36-40 小时。结果显示,大多数参与者表示,他们有能力满足有严重挑战行为的儿童的需求,但大多数人都曾与他们无法处理其行为的儿童共事过。我们的研究还发现了一些软驱逐做法的迹象,以及对现行非驱逐政策普遍缺乏了解的情况。我们对这些观念和做法所产生的影响进行了研究和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soft Expulsion: What Happens When School-Based Supports aren’t Enough

Very limited research exists regarding the beliefs and practices of student support teams (SSTs), sometimes called child study teams or IEP teams, in settings with non-expulsion policies for young children with severely challenging behaviors. Previous research examined teacher and administrator beliefs and practices and found that they engage in practices related to soft expulsion (Murphy et al. in Child Youth Serv Rev 158:107441, 2024). Some school psychologists and SST members may also resort to soft expulsion, subtly pushing children out of their schools due to challenging behaviors (Zinsser et al. in Rev Educ Res 92(5):743–785, 2022). This study utilized an anonymous, online, self-report measure to investigate the practices and beliefs of SST members in early childhood education settings with non-expulsion policies. Participants included 108 school-based service providers in one state. The majority identified as school psychologists, held a Master’s degree, had between 1 and 5 years of experience, and worked 36–40 h per week. Results showed that most participants said they had the supports to meet the needs of children with severely challenging behaviors, yet most had worked with a child whose behaviors they were unable to manage. Our examination also uncovered indications of soft expulsion practices and a general lack of knowledge about existing non-expulsion policies. The implications arising from these beliefs and practices are examined and discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal is a forum for the latest research related to prevention, treatment, and assessment practices that are associated with the pre-K to 12th-grade education system and focuses on children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. The journal publishes empirical studies, quantitative and qualitative research, and systematic and scoping review articles from authors representing the many disciplines that are involved in school mental health, including child and school psychology, education, pediatrics, child and adolescent psychiatry, developmental psychology, school counseling, social work and nursing.  Sample topics include: ·         Innovative school-based treatment practices·         Consultation and professional development procedures·         Dissemination and implementation science targeting schools·         Educational techniques for children with emotional and behavioral disorders·         Schoolwide prevention programs·         Medication effects on school behavior and achievement·         Assessment practices·         Special education services·         Developmental implications affecting learning and behavior·         Racial, ethnic, and cultural issues·         School policy·         Role of families in school mental health·         Prediction of impairment and resilience·         Moderators and mediators of response to treatment
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Design of an Inclusive Education Model for Students with Emotional Disabilities: A Research-Practice-Policy Partnership Soft Expulsion: What Happens When School-Based Supports aren’t Enough The Role of Teachers in Fostering Resilience After a Disaster in Indonesia Factors Associated with School Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Delivering a Tier 2 CBT-Based Programme in Schools Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of the 15-item Network Relationship Inventory-Social Provisions Version (NRI-SPV-15) in Chinese Children and Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1