利用贝叶斯 PBPK 建模方法重新审视阿昔洛韦治疗病毒性脑炎的剂量

Ming Sun, Martijn L Manson, Anne-Grete Martson, Jacob Bodilsen, Elizabeth CM de Lange, Tingjie Guo
{"title":"利用贝叶斯 PBPK 建模方法重新审视阿昔洛韦治疗病毒性脑炎的剂量","authors":"Ming Sun, Martijn L Manson, Anne-Grete Martson, Jacob Bodilsen, Elizabeth CM de Lange, Tingjie Guo","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.25.24312421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acyclovir is a primary treatment for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, patient outcomes remain suboptimal with high mortality and morbidity, following current dosing guidelines. Given the lack of alternative therapies, there is a pressing need to optimize acyclovir dosing, especially since initial regimens were developed in the 1980s with incomplete pharmacokinetic data in the CNS. This study aimed to evaluate both current and alternative acyclovir dosing regimens using a full Bayesian physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model tailored for viral encephalitis. We developed a CNS PBPK model to simulate acyclovir concentrations in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and subarachnoid space (SAS). Drug efficacy was assessed using two pharmacokinetic targets, 50%fT>IC50 and Cmin>IC50, with a safety threshold set at 25 mg/L in plasma. The standard dosing regimen (10 mg/kg TID) yielded sufficient acyclovir exposure in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and subarachnoid space (SAS) compartments based on the 50%fT>IC50 target. However, it did not consistently meet the Cmin>IC50 target, indicating potential suboptimal exposure in these compartments when evaluated against this criterion. Notably, a higher probability of target attainment (PTA) was generally observed in the brain ECF and SAS compared to plasma. Increasing the dosing frequency to QID improved target attainment but exceeded the toxicity threshold at 20 mg/kg. Our findings suggest that a dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg QID may offer a more effective and safer approach for managing CNS infections compared to the other tested alternative dosing regimens.","PeriodicalId":501447,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting acyclovir dosing for viral encephalitis using a Bayesian PBPK modeling approach\",\"authors\":\"Ming Sun, Martijn L Manson, Anne-Grete Martson, Jacob Bodilsen, Elizabeth CM de Lange, Tingjie Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.25.24312421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acyclovir is a primary treatment for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, patient outcomes remain suboptimal with high mortality and morbidity, following current dosing guidelines. Given the lack of alternative therapies, there is a pressing need to optimize acyclovir dosing, especially since initial regimens were developed in the 1980s with incomplete pharmacokinetic data in the CNS. This study aimed to evaluate both current and alternative acyclovir dosing regimens using a full Bayesian physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model tailored for viral encephalitis. We developed a CNS PBPK model to simulate acyclovir concentrations in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and subarachnoid space (SAS). Drug efficacy was assessed using two pharmacokinetic targets, 50%fT>IC50 and Cmin>IC50, with a safety threshold set at 25 mg/L in plasma. The standard dosing regimen (10 mg/kg TID) yielded sufficient acyclovir exposure in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and subarachnoid space (SAS) compartments based on the 50%fT>IC50 target. However, it did not consistently meet the Cmin>IC50 target, indicating potential suboptimal exposure in these compartments when evaluated against this criterion. Notably, a higher probability of target attainment (PTA) was generally observed in the brain ECF and SAS compared to plasma. Increasing the dosing frequency to QID improved target attainment but exceeded the toxicity threshold at 20 mg/kg. Our findings suggest that a dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg QID may offer a more effective and safer approach for managing CNS infections compared to the other tested alternative dosing regimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.25.24312421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.25.24312421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿昔洛韦是治疗由单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)和水痘-带状疱疹病毒(VZV)引起的中枢神经系统(CNS)感染的主要药物。然而,按照目前的用药指南,患者的治疗效果仍不理想,死亡率和发病率都很高。鉴于缺乏替代疗法,优化阿昔洛韦剂量的需求十分迫切,尤其是因为最初的治疗方案是在 20 世纪 80 年代开发的,当时中枢神经系统的药代动力学数据并不完整。本研究旨在使用为病毒性脑炎量身定制的全贝叶斯生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型,评估阿昔洛韦目前的给药方案和替代方案。我们开发了中枢神经系统 PBPK 模型,模拟阿昔洛韦在血浆、脑细胞外液 (ECF) 和蛛网膜下腔 (SAS) 中的浓度。使用两个药代动力学目标(50%fT>IC50 和 Cmin>IC50)评估药物疗效,安全阈值设定为血浆中 25 mg/L。根据50%fT>IC50目标值,标准给药方案(10 mg/kg TID)在血浆、脑细胞外液(ECF)和蛛网膜下腔(SAS)中产生了足够的阿昔洛韦暴露量。但是,它并没有持续达到Cmin>IC50目标值,这表明在根据这一标准进行评估时,在这些区室中可能存在次优暴露。值得注意的是,与血浆相比,在脑ECF和SAS中观察到的达标概率(PTA)普遍较高。将给药频率提高到 QID 可以提高达标率,但在 20 毫克/千克时会超过毒性阈值。我们的研究结果表明,与其他测试过的替代给药方案相比,10 毫克/千克或 15 毫克/千克 QID 给药方案可为中枢神经系统感染的治疗提供更有效、更安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting acyclovir dosing for viral encephalitis using a Bayesian PBPK modeling approach
Acyclovir is a primary treatment for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, patient outcomes remain suboptimal with high mortality and morbidity, following current dosing guidelines. Given the lack of alternative therapies, there is a pressing need to optimize acyclovir dosing, especially since initial regimens were developed in the 1980s with incomplete pharmacokinetic data in the CNS. This study aimed to evaluate both current and alternative acyclovir dosing regimens using a full Bayesian physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model tailored for viral encephalitis. We developed a CNS PBPK model to simulate acyclovir concentrations in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and subarachnoid space (SAS). Drug efficacy was assessed using two pharmacokinetic targets, 50%fT>IC50 and Cmin>IC50, with a safety threshold set at 25 mg/L in plasma. The standard dosing regimen (10 mg/kg TID) yielded sufficient acyclovir exposure in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF), and subarachnoid space (SAS) compartments based on the 50%fT>IC50 target. However, it did not consistently meet the Cmin>IC50 target, indicating potential suboptimal exposure in these compartments when evaluated against this criterion. Notably, a higher probability of target attainment (PTA) was generally observed in the brain ECF and SAS compared to plasma. Increasing the dosing frequency to QID improved target attainment but exceeded the toxicity threshold at 20 mg/kg. Our findings suggest that a dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg QID may offer a more effective and safer approach for managing CNS infections compared to the other tested alternative dosing regimens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tucaresol: An Oral Candidate Drug With Two Distinct Antiviral Mechanisms. Comparative Risk of the Onset of Atrial Fibrillation after Icosapent Ethyl versus Omega-3–Acid-Ethyl-Esters Adjuvant to Statins A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. Protective Effects of Psychiatric Medications against COVID-19 Mortality Before Vaccines Anti-cancer effect of memantine as adjunctive therapy in metastatic colon cancer: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1