抗抑郁药治疗老年人疼痛的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16234
Sujita W. Narayan, Vasi Naganathan, Lisa Vizza, Martin Underwood, Rowena Ivers, Andrew J. McLachlan, Linyi Zhou, Ramnik Singh, Shunyu Tao, Xiao Xi, Christina Abdel Shaheed
{"title":"抗抑郁药治疗老年人疼痛的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sujita W. Narayan,&nbsp;Vasi Naganathan,&nbsp;Lisa Vizza,&nbsp;Martin Underwood,&nbsp;Rowena Ivers,&nbsp;Andrew J. McLachlan,&nbsp;Linyi Zhou,&nbsp;Ramnik Singh,&nbsp;Shunyu Tao,&nbsp;Xiao Xi,&nbsp;Christina Abdel Shaheed","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>In many countries, pain is the most common indication for use of antidepressants in older adults. We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants, compared to all alternatives for pain in older adults (aged ≥65 years).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Trials published from inception to 1 February 2024, were retrieved from 13 databases. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study and participant characteristics, primary efficacy (pain scores, converted to 0–100 scale) and harms. Estimates for efficacy were pooled using a random effects model and reported as difference in means and 95% CI. Quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen studies (<i>n</i> = 1369 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently studied antidepressants were duloxetine and amitriptyline (6/15 studies each). Pain related to knee osteoarthritis was the most studied (6/15 studies). For knee osteoarthritis, antidepressants did not provide a statistically significant effect for the immediate term (0–2 weeks), (−5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −11.5 to 0.3), but duloxetine provided a statistically significant, albeit a very small effect in the intermediate term, (≥6 weeks and &lt;12 months), (−9.1, 95% CI: −11.8 to −6.4). Almost half (7/15) of the studies reported increased withdrawal of participants in the antidepressant treatment group <i>vs</i>. the comparator group due to adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>For most chronic painful conditions, the benefits and harms of antidepressant medicines are unclear. This evidence is predominantly from trials with sample sizes of &lt;100, have disclosed industry ties and classified as having unclear or high risk of bias.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 12","pages":"3097-3118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16234","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sujita W. Narayan,&nbsp;Vasi Naganathan,&nbsp;Lisa Vizza,&nbsp;Martin Underwood,&nbsp;Rowena Ivers,&nbsp;Andrew J. McLachlan,&nbsp;Linyi Zhou,&nbsp;Ramnik Singh,&nbsp;Shunyu Tao,&nbsp;Xiao Xi,&nbsp;Christina Abdel Shaheed\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>In many countries, pain is the most common indication for use of antidepressants in older adults. We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants, compared to all alternatives for pain in older adults (aged ≥65 years).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Trials published from inception to 1 February 2024, were retrieved from 13 databases. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study and participant characteristics, primary efficacy (pain scores, converted to 0–100 scale) and harms. Estimates for efficacy were pooled using a random effects model and reported as difference in means and 95% CI. Quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen studies (<i>n</i> = 1369 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently studied antidepressants were duloxetine and amitriptyline (6/15 studies each). Pain related to knee osteoarthritis was the most studied (6/15 studies). For knee osteoarthritis, antidepressants did not provide a statistically significant effect for the immediate term (0–2 weeks), (−5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −11.5 to 0.3), but duloxetine provided a statistically significant, albeit a very small effect in the intermediate term, (≥6 weeks and &lt;12 months), (−9.1, 95% CI: −11.8 to −6.4). Almost half (7/15) of the studies reported increased withdrawal of participants in the antidepressant treatment group <i>vs</i>. the comparator group due to adverse events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>For most chronic painful conditions, the benefits and harms of antidepressant medicines are unclear. This evidence is predominantly from trials with sample sizes of &lt;100, have disclosed industry ties and classified as having unclear or high risk of bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"90 12\",\"pages\":\"3097-3118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16234\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在许多国家,疼痛是老年人使用抗抑郁药的最常见适应症。我们对老年人(年龄≥65 岁)使用抗抑郁药治疗疼痛的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验证据进行了回顾。两位独立审稿人提取了有关研究和参与者特征、主要疗效(疼痛评分,转换为 0-100 分制)和危害的数据。使用随机效应模型对疗效进行汇总,并以均值差异和 95% CI 的形式进行报告。采用科克伦偏倚风险工具对纳入试验的质量进行评估。结果15项研究(n = 1369 名参与者)符合纳入标准。研究最多的抗抑郁药是度洛西汀和阿米替林(各为6/15项研究)。与膝关节骨关节炎相关的疼痛研究最多(6/15 项研究)。对于膝关节骨性关节炎,抗抑郁药在近期(0-2 周)的疗效不具有统计学意义(-5.6,95% 置信区间[CI]:-11.5 至 0.3),但度洛西汀在中期(≥6 周和 12 个月)的疗效具有统计学意义,尽管非常小(-9.1,95% 置信区间:-11.8 至 -6.4)。近一半(7/15)的研究报告称,抗抑郁治疗组与对照组相比,因不良事件而退出治疗的人数有所增加。这些证据主要来自样本量为100个的试验,这些试验披露了行业关系,并被归类为偏倚不明确或偏倚风险高的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

In many countries, pain is the most common indication for use of antidepressants in older adults. We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants, compared to all alternatives for pain in older adults (aged ≥65 years).

Methods

Trials published from inception to 1 February 2024, were retrieved from 13 databases. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study and participant characteristics, primary efficacy (pain scores, converted to 0–100 scale) and harms. Estimates for efficacy were pooled using a random effects model and reported as difference in means and 95% CI. Quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

Fifteen studies (n = 1369 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently studied antidepressants were duloxetine and amitriptyline (6/15 studies each). Pain related to knee osteoarthritis was the most studied (6/15 studies). For knee osteoarthritis, antidepressants did not provide a statistically significant effect for the immediate term (0–2 weeks), (−5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −11.5 to 0.3), but duloxetine provided a statistically significant, albeit a very small effect in the intermediate term, (≥6 weeks and <12 months), (−9.1, 95% CI: −11.8 to −6.4). Almost half (7/15) of the studies reported increased withdrawal of participants in the antidepressant treatment group vs. the comparator group due to adverse events.

Conclusions

For most chronic painful conditions, the benefits and harms of antidepressant medicines are unclear. This evidence is predominantly from trials with sample sizes of <100, have disclosed industry ties and classified as having unclear or high risk of bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Oral paltusotine, a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist: Mass balance, absolute bioavailability and metabolism in healthy participants. Virtual twin approach using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling in hospitalized patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Variability in intestinal drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in Crohn's disease and potential impact on oral drug absorption. Letter to the editor-Response to the article "Drug-induced liver injury associated with pretomanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid: Insights from FAERS database analysis". Paracetamol and its metabolites in children and adults with spinal muscular atrophy - a population pharmacokinetic model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1