卵巢鳞状细胞癌与浆液性癌的预后比较分析:SEER 数据库的启示

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15899
Xianglin Nie, Ting Xu, Wenjun Cheng
{"title":"卵巢鳞状细胞癌与浆液性癌的预后比较分析:SEER 数据库的启示","authors":"Xianglin Nie, Ting Xu, Wenjun Cheng","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify survival rates and potential prognostic factors of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), offering valuable insights for clinical decision making.MethodsLeveraging the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we selected 11 078 serous carcinoma (SC) patients and 198 OSCC patients based on predetermined criteria diagnosed from 2000 to 2020. We compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in two groups. Prognostic differences were also compared between OSCC and SC groups at different stages. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the impact of clinical and pathologic variables on the survival of patients with OSCC. Finally, we developed and validated a nomogram predictive model.ResultsOSCC tumors exhibited distinct characteristics, being relatively larger, more frequently unilateral, and better differentiated than SC tumors. After PSM, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly lower survival rates for OSCC patients in Stages IIB–IV, while Stages IA–IC displayed comparable survival. Independent risk factors for OSCC patients included advanced age, single marital status, higher tumor stage, and increased tumor size. Conversely, higher median household income and chemotherapy emerged as independent protective factors. Our predictive model and nomogram accurately forecasted patient survival rates in both SEER and internal validation datasets.ConclusionOSCC patients face significantly poorer prognosis than their SC counterparts, except in the very early stages. Higher median household income was associated with better OSCC survival.","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative prognosis analysis of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma versus serous carcinoma: Insights from the SEER database\",\"authors\":\"Xianglin Nie, Ting Xu, Wenjun Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.15899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify survival rates and potential prognostic factors of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), offering valuable insights for clinical decision making.MethodsLeveraging the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we selected 11 078 serous carcinoma (SC) patients and 198 OSCC patients based on predetermined criteria diagnosed from 2000 to 2020. We compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in two groups. Prognostic differences were also compared between OSCC and SC groups at different stages. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the impact of clinical and pathologic variables on the survival of patients with OSCC. Finally, we developed and validated a nomogram predictive model.ResultsOSCC tumors exhibited distinct characteristics, being relatively larger, more frequently unilateral, and better differentiated than SC tumors. After PSM, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly lower survival rates for OSCC patients in Stages IIB–IV, while Stages IA–IC displayed comparable survival. Independent risk factors for OSCC patients included advanced age, single marital status, higher tumor stage, and increased tumor size. Conversely, higher median household income and chemotherapy emerged as independent protective factors. Our predictive model and nomogram accurately forecasted patient survival rates in both SEER and internal validation datasets.ConclusionOSCC patients face significantly poorer prognosis than their SC counterparts, except in the very early stages. Higher median household income was associated with better OSCC survival.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15899\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定卵巢鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的生存率和潜在预后因素,为临床决策提供有价值的见解。方法我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,根据预先确定的标准选择了2000年至2020年期间确诊的11 078例浆液性癌(SC)患者和198例OSCC患者。我们比较了两组患者在倾向得分匹配(PSM)前后的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。我们还比较了 OSCC 组和 SC 组在不同阶段的预后差异。我们进行了单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析,以研究临床和病理变量对 OSCC 患者生存期的影响。最后,我们建立并验证了一个提名图预测模型。结果OSCC肿瘤表现出明显的特征,与SC肿瘤相比,肿瘤相对较大,多为单侧性,分化程度较高。经过 PSM 分析后,Kaplan-Meier 分析显示 IIB-IV 期 OSCC 患者的生存率明显较低,而 IA-IC 期患者的生存率相当。OSCC患者的独立风险因素包括高龄、单身、肿瘤分期较高和肿瘤体积增大。相反,较高的家庭收入中位数和化疗则是独立的保护因素。我们的预测模型和提名图准确预测了 SEER 和内部验证数据集中患者的生存率。家庭收入中位数越高,OSCC 患者的生存率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative prognosis analysis of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma versus serous carcinoma: Insights from the SEER database
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify survival rates and potential prognostic factors of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), offering valuable insights for clinical decision making.MethodsLeveraging the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we selected 11 078 serous carcinoma (SC) patients and 198 OSCC patients based on predetermined criteria diagnosed from 2000 to 2020. We compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in two groups. Prognostic differences were also compared between OSCC and SC groups at different stages. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the impact of clinical and pathologic variables on the survival of patients with OSCC. Finally, we developed and validated a nomogram predictive model.ResultsOSCC tumors exhibited distinct characteristics, being relatively larger, more frequently unilateral, and better differentiated than SC tumors. After PSM, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly lower survival rates for OSCC patients in Stages IIB–IV, while Stages IA–IC displayed comparable survival. Independent risk factors for OSCC patients included advanced age, single marital status, higher tumor stage, and increased tumor size. Conversely, higher median household income and chemotherapy emerged as independent protective factors. Our predictive model and nomogram accurately forecasted patient survival rates in both SEER and internal validation datasets.ConclusionOSCC patients face significantly poorer prognosis than their SC counterparts, except in the very early stages. Higher median household income was associated with better OSCC survival.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Routine ultrasound does not improve instrument placement at operative vaginal delivery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond borders: The global impact of violating reproductive human rights. Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines. Menstrual management using the etonogestrel implant in individuals with intellectual disabilities in Joinville, Brazil. Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1