Anthony D. Vaudo, Eva Lin, Jillian A. Luthy, Anne S. Leonard, Eliza M. Grames
{"title":"过去和现在的非生物条件能否解释野花花粉营养质量对蜜蜂的影响?","authors":"Anthony D. Vaudo, Eva Lin, Jillian A. Luthy, Anne S. Leonard, Eliza M. Grames","doi":"10.1007/s10682-024-10313-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Floral traits such as color, scent, and nectar often vary substantially within plant species. However, when it comes to pollen chemistry, the scale of intraspecific variation is largely unknown, as are its potential abiotic drivers. Bees collect pollen as their primary source of protein and lipids, and interspecific variation in pollen quality influences bee foraging preferences. Understanding the scale of intraspecific spatiotemporal variation in pollen macronutrient content could further uncover the nutritional basis of many plant-pollinator interactions influenced by geographic and climatic factors. Here, we sampled pollen from 35 bee-visited wildflower species across multiple sites in Great Basin/Eastern Sierra sagebrush steppe habitat (Nevada/California, USA) and analyzed their protein and lipid concentrations. Then, using Bayesian sparse regression, we explored the relationship between 44 site-specific climate variables and variation in pollen nutritional content. In some plant species, we discovered variation in protein or lipid concentrations across sites at a scale likely meaningful to bee performance. Further, this variation was weakly but significantly related to both current season below-ground (climatic water deficit) and previous season above-ground (dewpoint) conditions, uncovering the potential for community interactions mediated by floral nutrition to be altered via multiple plant ecophysiological pathways. Identifying the causes and consequences of variation in pollen nutrition is an effort critical to understanding how climate change impacts plant fitness via interactions with pollinators as well as the health of managed and wild bees.</p>","PeriodicalId":55158,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Ecology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do past and present abiotic conditions explain variation in the nutritional quality of wildflower pollens for bees?\",\"authors\":\"Anthony D. Vaudo, Eva Lin, Jillian A. Luthy, Anne S. Leonard, Eliza M. Grames\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10682-024-10313-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Floral traits such as color, scent, and nectar often vary substantially within plant species. However, when it comes to pollen chemistry, the scale of intraspecific variation is largely unknown, as are its potential abiotic drivers. Bees collect pollen as their primary source of protein and lipids, and interspecific variation in pollen quality influences bee foraging preferences. Understanding the scale of intraspecific spatiotemporal variation in pollen macronutrient content could further uncover the nutritional basis of many plant-pollinator interactions influenced by geographic and climatic factors. Here, we sampled pollen from 35 bee-visited wildflower species across multiple sites in Great Basin/Eastern Sierra sagebrush steppe habitat (Nevada/California, USA) and analyzed their protein and lipid concentrations. Then, using Bayesian sparse regression, we explored the relationship between 44 site-specific climate variables and variation in pollen nutritional content. In some plant species, we discovered variation in protein or lipid concentrations across sites at a scale likely meaningful to bee performance. Further, this variation was weakly but significantly related to both current season below-ground (climatic water deficit) and previous season above-ground (dewpoint) conditions, uncovering the potential for community interactions mediated by floral nutrition to be altered via multiple plant ecophysiological pathways. Identifying the causes and consequences of variation in pollen nutrition is an effort critical to understanding how climate change impacts plant fitness via interactions with pollinators as well as the health of managed and wild bees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Ecology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10313-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10313-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do past and present abiotic conditions explain variation in the nutritional quality of wildflower pollens for bees?
Floral traits such as color, scent, and nectar often vary substantially within plant species. However, when it comes to pollen chemistry, the scale of intraspecific variation is largely unknown, as are its potential abiotic drivers. Bees collect pollen as their primary source of protein and lipids, and interspecific variation in pollen quality influences bee foraging preferences. Understanding the scale of intraspecific spatiotemporal variation in pollen macronutrient content could further uncover the nutritional basis of many plant-pollinator interactions influenced by geographic and climatic factors. Here, we sampled pollen from 35 bee-visited wildflower species across multiple sites in Great Basin/Eastern Sierra sagebrush steppe habitat (Nevada/California, USA) and analyzed their protein and lipid concentrations. Then, using Bayesian sparse regression, we explored the relationship between 44 site-specific climate variables and variation in pollen nutritional content. In some plant species, we discovered variation in protein or lipid concentrations across sites at a scale likely meaningful to bee performance. Further, this variation was weakly but significantly related to both current season below-ground (climatic water deficit) and previous season above-ground (dewpoint) conditions, uncovering the potential for community interactions mediated by floral nutrition to be altered via multiple plant ecophysiological pathways. Identifying the causes and consequences of variation in pollen nutrition is an effort critical to understanding how climate change impacts plant fitness via interactions with pollinators as well as the health of managed and wild bees.
期刊介绍:
Evolutionary Ecology is a concept-oriented journal of biological research at the interface of ecology and evolution. We publish papers that therefore integrate both fields of research: research that seeks to explain the ecology of organisms in the context of evolution, or patterns of evolution as explained by ecological processes.
The journal publishes original research and discussion concerning the evolutionary ecology of organisms. These may include papers addressing evolutionary aspects of population ecology, organismal interactions and coevolution, behaviour, life histories, communication, morphology, host-parasite interactions and disease ecology, as well as ecological aspects of genetic processes. The objective is to promote the conceptual, theoretical and empirical development of ecology and evolutionary biology; the scope extends to any organism or system.
In additional to Original Research articles, we publish Review articles that survey recent developments in the field of evolutionary ecology; Ideas & Perspectives articles which present new points of view and novel hypotheses; and Comments on articles recently published in Evolutionary Ecology or elsewhere. We also welcome New Tests of Existing Ideas - testing well-established hypotheses but with broader data or more methodologically rigorous approaches; - and shorter Natural History Notes, which aim to present new observations of organismal biology in the wild that may provide inspiration for future research. As of 2018, we now also invite Methods papers, to present or review new theoretical, practical or analytical methods used in evolutionary ecology.
Students & Early Career Researchers: We particularly encourage, and offer incentives for, submission of Reviews, Ideas & Perspectives, and Methods papers by students and early-career researchers (defined as being within one year of award of a PhD degree) – see Students & Early Career Researchers