睡眠学者》随机对照试验:基于互联网的大学生失眠症简短干预措施

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.007
Eric S. Crosby, Wendy Troop-Gordon, Tracy K. Witte
{"title":"睡眠学者》随机对照试验:基于互联网的大学生失眠症简短干预措施","authors":"Eric S. Crosby, Wendy Troop-Gordon, Tracy K. Witte","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This randomized-controlled trial examined the efficacy of Sleep Scholar, a brief, internet-based insomnia intervention tailored to the needs of college students. College students commonly experience insomnia and various other mental health symptoms, including suicide ideation. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is a promising suicide prevention effort for college students because insomnia is robust risk factor for suicide ideation and CBT-I reduces suicide ideation. Moreover, CBT-I can be brief, self-guided, and internet-based. CBT-I also may elicit less stigma than treatment specifically targeting suicide ideation. However, existing forms of brief CBT-I are neither self-guided nor internet-based, and existing forms of self-guided, internet-based CBT-I are not brief. In addition, previous iterations of CBT-I are not typically designed to address the unique sleep needs of college students. For this registered clinical trial, we recruited 61 college students with at least subclinical insomnia symptoms. Participants were randomized to either Sleep Scholar or a control condition, Building Healthy Habits. Participants completed pretreatment daily sleep diaries and surveys, a posttreatment assessment of acceptability and satisfaction, a 1-week and 1-month survey follow-up, and daily sleep diaries throughout the 1-month follow-up period. Results showed that Sleep Scholar was more acceptable and satisfactory compared to the control condition at posttreatment. However, Sleep Scholar was not more effective for improving sleep or mental health symptoms compared to the control condition. These findings suggest that modifications to Sleep Scholar are needed to improve its efficacy.","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Randomized-Controlled Trial of Sleep Scholar: A Brief, Internet-Based Insomnia Intervention for College Students\",\"authors\":\"Eric S. Crosby, Wendy Troop-Gordon, Tracy K. Witte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This randomized-controlled trial examined the efficacy of Sleep Scholar, a brief, internet-based insomnia intervention tailored to the needs of college students. College students commonly experience insomnia and various other mental health symptoms, including suicide ideation. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is a promising suicide prevention effort for college students because insomnia is robust risk factor for suicide ideation and CBT-I reduces suicide ideation. Moreover, CBT-I can be brief, self-guided, and internet-based. CBT-I also may elicit less stigma than treatment specifically targeting suicide ideation. However, existing forms of brief CBT-I are neither self-guided nor internet-based, and existing forms of self-guided, internet-based CBT-I are not brief. In addition, previous iterations of CBT-I are not typically designed to address the unique sleep needs of college students. For this registered clinical trial, we recruited 61 college students with at least subclinical insomnia symptoms. Participants were randomized to either Sleep Scholar or a control condition, Building Healthy Habits. Participants completed pretreatment daily sleep diaries and surveys, a posttreatment assessment of acceptability and satisfaction, a 1-week and 1-month survey follow-up, and daily sleep diaries throughout the 1-month follow-up period. Results showed that Sleep Scholar was more acceptable and satisfactory compared to the control condition at posttreatment. However, Sleep Scholar was not more effective for improving sleep or mental health symptoms compared to the control condition. These findings suggest that modifications to Sleep Scholar are needed to improve its efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项随机对照试验研究了 "睡眠学者 "的疗效。"睡眠学者 "是一项基于互联网的简短失眠干预措施,专门针对大学生的需求量身定制。大学生通常会出现失眠和其他各种心理健康症状,包括自杀念头。失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)是一种很有前景的预防大学生自杀的方法,因为失眠是导致自杀意念的重要危险因素,而CBT-I能减少自杀意念。此外,CBT-I 可以是简短的、自我指导的和基于互联网的。与专门针对自杀意念的治疗相比,CBT-I 所引起的耻辱感也较少。然而,现有的简短型 CBT-I 既不是自我指导型的,也不是基于互联网的,而且现有的自我指导型、基于互联网的 CBT-I 并不简短。此外,以往迭代的 CBT-I 通常不是针对大学生独特的睡眠需求而设计的。在这项注册临床试验中,我们招募了 61 名至少有亚临床失眠症状的大学生。参与者被随机分配到 "睡眠学者 "或 "建立健康习惯 "对照组。参与者在治疗前完成每日睡眠日记和调查,治疗后完成可接受性和满意度评估,1周和1个月的调查随访,以及1个月随访期间的每日睡眠日记。结果显示,与对照组相比,睡眠学者在治疗后的可接受性和满意度更高。不过,与对照组相比,《睡眠学者》在改善睡眠或心理健康症状方面的效果并不明显。这些研究结果表明,需要对《睡眠学者》进行修改,以提高其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Pilot Randomized-Controlled Trial of Sleep Scholar: A Brief, Internet-Based Insomnia Intervention for College Students
This randomized-controlled trial examined the efficacy of Sleep Scholar, a brief, internet-based insomnia intervention tailored to the needs of college students. College students commonly experience insomnia and various other mental health symptoms, including suicide ideation. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is a promising suicide prevention effort for college students because insomnia is robust risk factor for suicide ideation and CBT-I reduces suicide ideation. Moreover, CBT-I can be brief, self-guided, and internet-based. CBT-I also may elicit less stigma than treatment specifically targeting suicide ideation. However, existing forms of brief CBT-I are neither self-guided nor internet-based, and existing forms of self-guided, internet-based CBT-I are not brief. In addition, previous iterations of CBT-I are not typically designed to address the unique sleep needs of college students. For this registered clinical trial, we recruited 61 college students with at least subclinical insomnia symptoms. Participants were randomized to either Sleep Scholar or a control condition, Building Healthy Habits. Participants completed pretreatment daily sleep diaries and surveys, a posttreatment assessment of acceptability and satisfaction, a 1-week and 1-month survey follow-up, and daily sleep diaries throughout the 1-month follow-up period. Results showed that Sleep Scholar was more acceptable and satisfactory compared to the control condition at posttreatment. However, Sleep Scholar was not more effective for improving sleep or mental health symptoms compared to the control condition. These findings suggest that modifications to Sleep Scholar are needed to improve its efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Underlying Working Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Exposure: Exploring the Role of Fearful Expectancies and Habituation State of the Science in Behavior Therapy: Taking Stock and Looking Forward Editorial Board Explaining How Psychotherapy Affects the Brain Can Increase the Perceived Effectiveness of Psychotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1