克洛尼丁胶粘贴对妥瑞症患者的疗效:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1097/wnf.0000000000000605
Zhimin Zhao,Yun Qian,Yasong Du,Hong Chen,Jie He,Yanhui Chen,Xiuxia Wang,Jianning Mai,Suzhen Sun,Huimei Wang,Fuyong Jiao
{"title":"克洛尼丁胶粘贴对妥瑞症患者的疗效:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。","authors":"Zhimin Zhao,Yun Qian,Yasong Du,Hong Chen,Jie He,Yanhui Chen,Xiuxia Wang,Jianning Mai,Suzhen Sun,Huimei Wang,Fuyong Jiao","doi":"10.1097/wnf.0000000000000605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to explore the efficacy of the clonidine adhesive patch for participants with Tourette syndrome (TS).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase IV clinical trial included participants with TS at 20 centers between May 2012 and March 2015. Treatment efficacy at week 8 was the primary outcome. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale and Improvement scale were the secondary endpoints.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThis trial included 488 participants, with 121 participants in the 2.0-mg/wk group, 119 participants in the 1.5-mg/wk group, 126 participants in the 1.0-mg/wk group, and 122 participants in the placebo group. For Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score reduction rate, compared with the placebo group (39.60 ± 25.56), those of the 2.0-mg/wk group (63.21 ± 32.60) and the 1.5-mg/wk group (68.16 ± 25.88) were statistically significantly different (all P < 0.001). For total Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score, compared with the placebo group (17.0 ± 8.03), the score for the 2.0-mg/wk group was 9.9 ± 8.36 (P < 0.001); 1.5-mg/wk group, 9.6 ± 8.03 (P < 0.001); and 1.0-mg/wk group, 10.5 ± 9.28 (P < 0.001). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale and Improvement scale scores were statistically significantly different in the 3 clonidine (or experimental) groups compared with the placebo group (all P < 0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nLarger doses of the clonidine adhesive patch such as 1.5 and 2.0 mg/wk are effective in improving the symptoms and overall function of participants with TS.","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Clonidine Adhesive Patch for Patients With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zhimin Zhao,Yun Qian,Yasong Du,Hong Chen,Jie He,Yanhui Chen,Xiuxia Wang,Jianning Mai,Suzhen Sun,Huimei Wang,Fuyong Jiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/wnf.0000000000000605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study aimed to explore the efficacy of the clonidine adhesive patch for participants with Tourette syndrome (TS).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase IV clinical trial included participants with TS at 20 centers between May 2012 and March 2015. Treatment efficacy at week 8 was the primary outcome. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale and Improvement scale were the secondary endpoints.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThis trial included 488 participants, with 121 participants in the 2.0-mg/wk group, 119 participants in the 1.5-mg/wk group, 126 participants in the 1.0-mg/wk group, and 122 participants in the placebo group. For Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score reduction rate, compared with the placebo group (39.60 ± 25.56), those of the 2.0-mg/wk group (63.21 ± 32.60) and the 1.5-mg/wk group (68.16 ± 25.88) were statistically significantly different (all P < 0.001). For total Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score, compared with the placebo group (17.0 ± 8.03), the score for the 2.0-mg/wk group was 9.9 ± 8.36 (P < 0.001); 1.5-mg/wk group, 9.6 ± 8.03 (P < 0.001); and 1.0-mg/wk group, 10.5 ± 9.28 (P < 0.001). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale and Improvement scale scores were statistically significantly different in the 3 clonidine (or experimental) groups compared with the placebo group (all P < 0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nLarger doses of the clonidine adhesive patch such as 1.5 and 2.0 mg/wk are effective in improving the symptoms and overall function of participants with TS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/wnf.0000000000000605\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/wnf.0000000000000605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨氯尼替胺胶贴对妥瑞症(TS)患者的疗效。方法这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心 IV 期临床试验纳入了 2012 年 5 月至 2015 年 3 月期间 20 个中心的 TS 患者。第 8 周的疗效是主要结果。结果该试验纳入了488名参与者,其中2.0毫克/周组有121名参与者,1.5毫克/周组有119名参与者,1.0毫克/周组有126名参与者,安慰剂组有122名参与者。在耶鲁全球抽搐严重程度量表评分减少率方面,与安慰剂组(39.60 ± 25.56)相比,2.0 毫克/周组(63.21 ± 32.60)和 1.5 毫克/周组(68.16 ± 25.88)在统计学上有显著差异(均为 P <0.001)。在耶鲁全球抽搐严重程度量表总分方面,与安慰剂组(17.0 ± 8.03)相比,2.0 毫克/周组为 9.9 ± 8.36(P < 0.001);1.5 毫克/周组为 9.6 ± 8.03(P < 0.001);1.0 毫克/周组为 10.5 ± 9.28(P < 0.001)。与安慰剂组相比,3 个氯硝柳胺组(或实验组)的临床总体印象--严重程度量表和改善程度量表评分均有显著统计学差异(均 P < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Clonidine Adhesive Patch for Patients With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial.
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the efficacy of the clonidine adhesive patch for participants with Tourette syndrome (TS). METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase IV clinical trial included participants with TS at 20 centers between May 2012 and March 2015. Treatment efficacy at week 8 was the primary outcome. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale and Improvement scale were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS This trial included 488 participants, with 121 participants in the 2.0-mg/wk group, 119 participants in the 1.5-mg/wk group, 126 participants in the 1.0-mg/wk group, and 122 participants in the placebo group. For Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score reduction rate, compared with the placebo group (39.60 ± 25.56), those of the 2.0-mg/wk group (63.21 ± 32.60) and the 1.5-mg/wk group (68.16 ± 25.88) were statistically significantly different (all P < 0.001). For total Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score, compared with the placebo group (17.0 ± 8.03), the score for the 2.0-mg/wk group was 9.9 ± 8.36 (P < 0.001); 1.5-mg/wk group, 9.6 ± 8.03 (P < 0.001); and 1.0-mg/wk group, 10.5 ± 9.28 (P < 0.001). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale and Improvement scale scores were statistically significantly different in the 3 clonidine (or experimental) groups compared with the placebo group (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Larger doses of the clonidine adhesive patch such as 1.5 and 2.0 mg/wk are effective in improving the symptoms and overall function of participants with TS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
期刊最新文献
Translational Neuroscience Contributes to Understanding Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Dostoyevsky's "Brothers Karamazov" With Treatment Implications. Pharmacological Management of Acute and Chronic Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Retrospective Study on Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Related Tremor: A Treatment Option Worth Trying. Molecular Docking Analysis Reveals the Promising Role of Apigenin as a Potential Treatment for Neurological Disorders. A Real-World Experience of Rituximab: A Panacea in Therapy of Multiple Sclerosis in Low- and Middle-Income Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1