老年受者接受活体肾移植比接受死体肾移植的益处。对欧洲大型登记队列的倾向得分匹配分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.13452
Néstor Toapanta,Jordi Comas,Ignacio Revuelta,Anna Manonelles,Carme Facundo,María José Pérez-Saez,Anna Vila,Emma Arcos,Jaume Tort,Magali Giral,Maarten Naesens,Dirk Kuypers,Anders Asberg,Francesc Moreso,Oriol Bestard,
{"title":"老年受者接受活体肾移植比接受死体肾移植的益处。对欧洲大型登记队列的倾向得分匹配分析。","authors":"Néstor Toapanta,Jordi Comas,Ignacio Revuelta,Anna Manonelles,Carme Facundo,María José Pérez-Saez,Anna Vila,Emma Arcos,Jaume Tort,Magali Giral,Maarten Naesens,Dirk Kuypers,Anders Asberg,Francesc Moreso,Oriol Bestard,","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although kidney transplantation from living donors (LD) offers better long-term results than from deceased donors (DD), elderly recipients are less likely to receive LD transplants than younger ones. We analyzed renal transplant outcomes from LD versus DD in elderly recipients with a propensity-matched score. This retrospective, observational study included the first single kidney transplants in recipients aged ≥65 years from two European registry cohorts (2013-2020, n = 4,257). Recipients of LD (n = 408), brain death donors (BDD, n = 3,072), and controlled cardiocirculatory death donors (cDCD, n = 777) were matched for donor and recipient age, sex, dialysis time and recipient diabetes. Major graft and patient outcomes were investigated. Unmatched analyses showed that LD recipients were more likely to be transplanted preemptively and had shorter dialysis times than any DD type. The propensity score matched Cox's regression analysis between LD and BDD (387-pairs) and LD and cDCD (259-pairs) revealing a higher hazard ratio for graft failure with BDD (2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15], p = 0.016) and cDCD (3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39], p < 0.001). One-year eGFR was higher in LD transplants than in BDD and cDCD recipients. In elderly recipients, LD transplantation offers superior graft survival and renal function compared to BDD or cDCD. This strategy should be further promoted to improve transplant outcomes.","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"29 1","pages":"13452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Living Over Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Large European Registry Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Néstor Toapanta,Jordi Comas,Ignacio Revuelta,Anna Manonelles,Carme Facundo,María José Pérez-Saez,Anna Vila,Emma Arcos,Jaume Tort,Magali Giral,Maarten Naesens,Dirk Kuypers,Anders Asberg,Francesc Moreso,Oriol Bestard,\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ti.2024.13452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although kidney transplantation from living donors (LD) offers better long-term results than from deceased donors (DD), elderly recipients are less likely to receive LD transplants than younger ones. We analyzed renal transplant outcomes from LD versus DD in elderly recipients with a propensity-matched score. This retrospective, observational study included the first single kidney transplants in recipients aged ≥65 years from two European registry cohorts (2013-2020, n = 4,257). Recipients of LD (n = 408), brain death donors (BDD, n = 3,072), and controlled cardiocirculatory death donors (cDCD, n = 777) were matched for donor and recipient age, sex, dialysis time and recipient diabetes. Major graft and patient outcomes were investigated. Unmatched analyses showed that LD recipients were more likely to be transplanted preemptively and had shorter dialysis times than any DD type. The propensity score matched Cox's regression analysis between LD and BDD (387-pairs) and LD and cDCD (259-pairs) revealing a higher hazard ratio for graft failure with BDD (2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15], p = 0.016) and cDCD (3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39], p < 0.001). One-year eGFR was higher in LD transplants than in BDD and cDCD recipients. In elderly recipients, LD transplantation offers superior graft survival and renal function compared to BDD or cDCD. This strategy should be further promoted to improve transplant outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant International\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"13452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然活体捐献者(LD)肾移植的长期效果优于已故捐献者(DD),但老年受者接受 LD 移植的可能性低于年轻受者。我们分析了老年受者接受 LD 与 DD 肾移植的结果,并进行了倾向匹配评分。这项回顾性观察研究纳入了两个欧洲登记队列(2013-2020 年,n = 4,257 例)中年龄≥65 岁受者的首例单肾移植。LD(n = 408)、脑死亡捐献者(BDD,n = 3,072)和受控心循环死亡捐献者(cDCD,n = 777)的受者与捐献者和受者的年龄、性别、透析时间和受者糖尿病情况相匹配。对主要移植物和患者的预后进行了调查。非配对分析表明,与任何 DD 类型相比,LD 受体更有可能接受先期移植,且透析时间更短。LD 和 BDD(387 对)以及 LD 和 cDCD(259 对)之间的倾向得分匹配 Cox 回归分析显示,BDD(2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15],p = 0.016)和 cDCD(3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39],p < 0.001)的移植失败危险比更高。LD移植者的一年eGFR高于BDD和cDCD受者。在老年受者中,LD移植比BDD或cDCD移植具有更高的移植存活率和肾功能。应进一步推广这一策略,以改善移植结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits of Living Over Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Large European Registry Cohort.
Although kidney transplantation from living donors (LD) offers better long-term results than from deceased donors (DD), elderly recipients are less likely to receive LD transplants than younger ones. We analyzed renal transplant outcomes from LD versus DD in elderly recipients with a propensity-matched score. This retrospective, observational study included the first single kidney transplants in recipients aged ≥65 years from two European registry cohorts (2013-2020, n = 4,257). Recipients of LD (n = 408), brain death donors (BDD, n = 3,072), and controlled cardiocirculatory death donors (cDCD, n = 777) were matched for donor and recipient age, sex, dialysis time and recipient diabetes. Major graft and patient outcomes were investigated. Unmatched analyses showed that LD recipients were more likely to be transplanted preemptively and had shorter dialysis times than any DD type. The propensity score matched Cox's regression analysis between LD and BDD (387-pairs) and LD and cDCD (259-pairs) revealing a higher hazard ratio for graft failure with BDD (2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15], p = 0.016) and cDCD (3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39], p < 0.001). One-year eGFR was higher in LD transplants than in BDD and cDCD recipients. In elderly recipients, LD transplantation offers superior graft survival and renal function compared to BDD or cDCD. This strategy should be further promoted to improve transplant outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Normothermic Machine Perfusion Reconstitutes Porcine Kidney Tissue Metabolism But Induces an Inflammatory Response, Which Is Reduced by Complement C5 Inhibition. Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antibody in Solid Organ Transplantation - Is It Time to Test? Allorecognition Unveiled: Integrating Recent Breakthroughs Into the Current Paradigm. The impact of the EVLP on the lung microbiome and its inflammatory reaction. Adjusted Donor Age: A Clinical Score to Support Organ Acceptance Decisions in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1