理解虚拟服务助理的热情和能力在服务共创与服务恢复中的作用

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Services Marketing Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1108/jsm-01-2024-0020
Gunjan Dandotiya, Juhi Gahlot Sarkar, Abhigyan Sarkar
{"title":"理解虚拟服务助理的热情和能力在服务共创与服务恢复中的作用","authors":"Gunjan Dandotiya, Juhi Gahlot Sarkar, Abhigyan Sarkar","doi":"10.1108/jsm-01-2024-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Based on the stereotype content model (SCM), this study aims to enrich comprehension of virtual service assistant (VSA)-enabled service delivery through two pivotal avenues. Firstly, it aims to conceptualize and test the fundamental mechanism underlying how businesses deploy services using VSAs. Secondly, this study explores whether the paradigms of service co-creation versus service recovery differentially impact customers’ perceptions of warmth and competence in VSA-enabled service delivery.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study used a one-factorial (service paradigm: service co-creation vs service recovery) field experiment. Covariance-based structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that VSA service quality dimensions impact satisfaction for service co-creation and both trust and satisfaction for service recovery. The stronger link that mediates this effect is competence for service co-creation and warmth for service recovery.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research extends the understanding of SCM to VSA-enabled services and shows the asymmetries of mediation between the paradigms of service co-creation versus service recovery to suggest the most effective approach for VSAs to successfully meet customer requirements for establishing trust and satisfaction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Services Marketing","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehending roles of virtual service assistant’s warmth and competence for service co-creation versus service recovery\",\"authors\":\"Gunjan Dandotiya, Juhi Gahlot Sarkar, Abhigyan Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsm-01-2024-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Based on the stereotype content model (SCM), this study aims to enrich comprehension of virtual service assistant (VSA)-enabled service delivery through two pivotal avenues. Firstly, it aims to conceptualize and test the fundamental mechanism underlying how businesses deploy services using VSAs. Secondly, this study explores whether the paradigms of service co-creation versus service recovery differentially impact customers’ perceptions of warmth and competence in VSA-enabled service delivery.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study used a one-factorial (service paradigm: service co-creation vs service recovery) field experiment. Covariance-based structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results show that VSA service quality dimensions impact satisfaction for service co-creation and both trust and satisfaction for service recovery. The stronger link that mediates this effect is competence for service co-creation and warmth for service recovery.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This research extends the understanding of SCM to VSA-enabled services and shows the asymmetries of mediation between the paradigms of service co-creation versus service recovery to suggest the most effective approach for VSAs to successfully meet customer requirements for establishing trust and satisfaction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Services Marketing\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Services Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-01-2024-0020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Services Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-01-2024-0020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究以定型内容模型(SCM)为基础,旨在通过两个关键途径丰富对虚拟服务助理(VSA)提供服务的理解。首先,本研究旨在构思和检验企业如何利用虚拟服务助理部署服务的基本机制。其次,本研究探讨了服务共创范式与服务恢复范式是否会对客户对 VSA 服务提供中的热情和能力感知产生不同影响。结果研究结果表明,VSA 服务质量维度对服务共创的满意度有影响,对服务恢复的信任度和满意度也有影响。原创性/价值这项研究将对供应链管理的理解扩展到了 VSA 支持的服务,并显示了服务共创与服务恢复范式之间的非对称中介作用,从而为 VSA 成功满足客户建立信任和满意度的要求提出了最有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehending roles of virtual service assistant’s warmth and competence for service co-creation versus service recovery

Purpose

Based on the stereotype content model (SCM), this study aims to enrich comprehension of virtual service assistant (VSA)-enabled service delivery through two pivotal avenues. Firstly, it aims to conceptualize and test the fundamental mechanism underlying how businesses deploy services using VSAs. Secondly, this study explores whether the paradigms of service co-creation versus service recovery differentially impact customers’ perceptions of warmth and competence in VSA-enabled service delivery.

Design/methodology/approach

This study used a one-factorial (service paradigm: service co-creation vs service recovery) field experiment. Covariance-based structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data.

Findings

The results show that VSA service quality dimensions impact satisfaction for service co-creation and both trust and satisfaction for service recovery. The stronger link that mediates this effect is competence for service co-creation and warmth for service recovery.

Originality/value

This research extends the understanding of SCM to VSA-enabled services and shows the asymmetries of mediation between the paradigms of service co-creation versus service recovery to suggest the most effective approach for VSAs to successfully meet customer requirements for establishing trust and satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
20.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: ■Customer policy and service ■Marketing of services ■Marketing planning ■Service marketing abroad ■Service quality Capturing and retaining customers in a service industry is a vastly different activity to its product-based counterpart. The fickle nature of today"s consumer is a vital factor in understanding the factors which determine successful holding of market share - and the intense competition within the sector means practitioners must keep pace with new developments if they are to outwit competitors and develop customer loyalty.
期刊最新文献
Cite me! Perspectives on coercive citation in reviewing Editorial: Embracing the future of services marketing Customer churn analysis using feature optimization methods and tree-based classifiers Low-income consumers’ informal and formal financial service experiences: perceptions of access, inclusion, and social dependence Enhancing customer engagement behaviors via customer-to-customer interactions and identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1