使用普通混凝土或再生混凝土层对受损钢筋混凝土梁的修复行为的影响

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Structural Concrete Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1002/suco.202301054
Ala’ Taleb Obaidat
{"title":"使用普通混凝土或再生混凝土层对受损钢筋混凝土梁的修复行为的影响","authors":"Ala’ Taleb Obaidat","doi":"10.1002/suco.202301054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study utilized experimental research to investigate the efficiency of using normal aggregate concrete (NAC) or recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) as a new concrete layer for repairing projectile bullet damage to strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) beams. This study comprised the construction and testing of eight RC beams made of RAC and NAC. They are initially subjected to projectile bullets and after that tested with flexure load to evaluate the effect of using RAC and NAC that was investigated. The findings of test results demonstrate that the repaired specimens with RAC or NAC experienced a higher load capacity than the damaged control specimens. As such, this approach could potentially use to restore RAC or NAC beams were previously damaged by projectile bullets. In addition, the findings of this research indicate that the load capacity of the damaged RC beams that were previously repaired using the NAC layer was higher than the load capacity of the damaged RC beams that were repaired using the RAC layer. The load capacity enhanced significantly of (106%–118%) and (104%–113%), respectively, when NAC and RAC are utilized in repairs. Therefore, using either NAC or RAC concrete is more economical, environmentally friendly, and efficient than demolishing.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of using normal concrete or recycled concrete layer on behavior of repaired projectile bullet damaged reinforced concrete beams\",\"authors\":\"Ala’ Taleb Obaidat\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/suco.202301054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study utilized experimental research to investigate the efficiency of using normal aggregate concrete (NAC) or recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) as a new concrete layer for repairing projectile bullet damage to strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) beams. This study comprised the construction and testing of eight RC beams made of RAC and NAC. They are initially subjected to projectile bullets and after that tested with flexure load to evaluate the effect of using RAC and NAC that was investigated. The findings of test results demonstrate that the repaired specimens with RAC or NAC experienced a higher load capacity than the damaged control specimens. As such, this approach could potentially use to restore RAC or NAC beams were previously damaged by projectile bullets. In addition, the findings of this research indicate that the load capacity of the damaged RC beams that were previously repaired using the NAC layer was higher than the load capacity of the damaged RC beams that were repaired using the RAC layer. The load capacity enhanced significantly of (106%–118%) and (104%–113%), respectively, when NAC and RAC are utilized in repairs. Therefore, using either NAC or RAC concrete is more economical, environmentally friendly, and efficient than demolishing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Concrete\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Concrete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202301054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202301054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用实验研究来探讨使用普通骨料混凝土(NAC)或再生骨料混凝土(RAC)作为新的混凝土层来修复弹丸对加固钢筋混凝土(RC)梁造成的损坏的效率。这项研究包括建造和测试八根由 RAC 和 NAC 制成的钢筋混凝土梁。这些梁首先受到弹丸的攻击,然后进行挠曲载荷测试,以评估使用 RAC 和 NAC 的效果。测试结果表明,与受损的对照试样相比,使用 RAC 或 NAC 的修复试样具有更高的承载能力。因此,这种方法可用于修复之前被射弹损坏的 RAC 或 NAC 梁。此外,研究结果表明,之前使用 NAC 层修复的受损 RC 梁的承载能力高于使用 RAC 层修复的受损 RC 梁的承载能力。在使用 NAC 和 RAC 进行修复时,承载能力分别大幅提高了(106%-118%)和(104%-113%)。因此,使用 NAC 或 RAC 混凝土比拆除更经济、环保和高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of using normal concrete or recycled concrete layer on behavior of repaired projectile bullet damaged reinforced concrete beams
This study utilized experimental research to investigate the efficiency of using normal aggregate concrete (NAC) or recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) as a new concrete layer for repairing projectile bullet damage to strengthening reinforced concrete (RC) beams. This study comprised the construction and testing of eight RC beams made of RAC and NAC. They are initially subjected to projectile bullets and after that tested with flexure load to evaluate the effect of using RAC and NAC that was investigated. The findings of test results demonstrate that the repaired specimens with RAC or NAC experienced a higher load capacity than the damaged control specimens. As such, this approach could potentially use to restore RAC or NAC beams were previously damaged by projectile bullets. In addition, the findings of this research indicate that the load capacity of the damaged RC beams that were previously repaired using the NAC layer was higher than the load capacity of the damaged RC beams that were repaired using the RAC layer. The load capacity enhanced significantly of (106%–118%) and (104%–113%), respectively, when NAC and RAC are utilized in repairs. Therefore, using either NAC or RAC concrete is more economical, environmentally friendly, and efficient than demolishing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical behavior of prestressed UHPC wind turbine tower columns under combined axial compression and bending Experimental investigation on mechanical property and hydration process of sintered sludge cement paste at different water‐binder ratios and curing ages Recent advances in embedded technologies and self‐sensing concrete for structural health monitoring Strut‐and‐tie model for column‐to‐drilled shaft connections in reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to lateral loads Seismic performance of reinforced concrete stairs with new sliding support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1