{"title":"布朗运动盈余条件下的最优梯度股利分配","authors":"Chonghu Guan, Zuo Quan Xu","doi":"10.1137/23m159250x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Volume 62, Issue 5, Page 2590-2620, October 2024. <br/> Abstract. This paper is concerned with a long-standing optimal dividend payout problem subject to the so-called ratcheting constraint, that is, the dividend payout rate shall be nondecreasing over time and is thus self-path-dependent. The surplus process is modeled by a drifted Brownian motion process and the aim is to find the optimal dividend ratcheting strategy to maximize the expectation of the total discounted dividend payouts until the ruin time. Due to the self-path-dependent control constraint, the standard control theory cannot be directly applied to tackle the problem. The related Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation is a new type of variational inequality. In the literature, it is only shown to have a viscosity solution, which is not strong enough to guarantee the existence of an optimal dividend ratcheting strategy. This paper proposes a novel partial differential equation method to study the HJB equation. We not only prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution in some stronger functional space, but also prove the strict monotonicity, boundedness, and [math]-smoothness of the dividend ratcheting free boundary. Based on these results, we eventually derive an optimal dividend ratcheting strategy, and thus solve the open problem completely. Economically speaking, we find that if the surplus volatility is above an explicit threshold, then one should pay dividends at the maximum rate, regardless of the surplus level. Otherwise, by contrast, the optimal dividend ratcheting strategy relies on the surplus level and one should only ratchet up the dividend payout rate when the surplus level touches the dividend ratcheting free boundary. Moreover, our numerical results suggest that one should invest in those companies with stable dividend payout strategies since their income rates should be higher and volatility rates smaller.","PeriodicalId":49531,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Ratcheting of Dividend Payout Under Brownian Motion Surplus\",\"authors\":\"Chonghu Guan, Zuo Quan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/23m159250x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Volume 62, Issue 5, Page 2590-2620, October 2024. <br/> Abstract. This paper is concerned with a long-standing optimal dividend payout problem subject to the so-called ratcheting constraint, that is, the dividend payout rate shall be nondecreasing over time and is thus self-path-dependent. The surplus process is modeled by a drifted Brownian motion process and the aim is to find the optimal dividend ratcheting strategy to maximize the expectation of the total discounted dividend payouts until the ruin time. Due to the self-path-dependent control constraint, the standard control theory cannot be directly applied to tackle the problem. The related Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation is a new type of variational inequality. In the literature, it is only shown to have a viscosity solution, which is not strong enough to guarantee the existence of an optimal dividend ratcheting strategy. This paper proposes a novel partial differential equation method to study the HJB equation. We not only prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution in some stronger functional space, but also prove the strict monotonicity, boundedness, and [math]-smoothness of the dividend ratcheting free boundary. Based on these results, we eventually derive an optimal dividend ratcheting strategy, and thus solve the open problem completely. Economically speaking, we find that if the surplus volatility is above an explicit threshold, then one should pay dividends at the maximum rate, regardless of the surplus level. Otherwise, by contrast, the optimal dividend ratcheting strategy relies on the surplus level and one should only ratchet up the dividend payout rate when the surplus level touches the dividend ratcheting free boundary. Moreover, our numerical results suggest that one should invest in those companies with stable dividend payout strategies since their income rates should be higher and volatility rates smaller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m159250x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m159250x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Ratcheting of Dividend Payout Under Brownian Motion Surplus
SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Volume 62, Issue 5, Page 2590-2620, October 2024. Abstract. This paper is concerned with a long-standing optimal dividend payout problem subject to the so-called ratcheting constraint, that is, the dividend payout rate shall be nondecreasing over time and is thus self-path-dependent. The surplus process is modeled by a drifted Brownian motion process and the aim is to find the optimal dividend ratcheting strategy to maximize the expectation of the total discounted dividend payouts until the ruin time. Due to the self-path-dependent control constraint, the standard control theory cannot be directly applied to tackle the problem. The related Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation is a new type of variational inequality. In the literature, it is only shown to have a viscosity solution, which is not strong enough to guarantee the existence of an optimal dividend ratcheting strategy. This paper proposes a novel partial differential equation method to study the HJB equation. We not only prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution in some stronger functional space, but also prove the strict monotonicity, boundedness, and [math]-smoothness of the dividend ratcheting free boundary. Based on these results, we eventually derive an optimal dividend ratcheting strategy, and thus solve the open problem completely. Economically speaking, we find that if the surplus volatility is above an explicit threshold, then one should pay dividends at the maximum rate, regardless of the surplus level. Otherwise, by contrast, the optimal dividend ratcheting strategy relies on the surplus level and one should only ratchet up the dividend payout rate when the surplus level touches the dividend ratcheting free boundary. Moreover, our numerical results suggest that one should invest in those companies with stable dividend payout strategies since their income rates should be higher and volatility rates smaller.
期刊介绍:
SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization (SICON) publishes original research articles on the mathematics and applications of control theory and certain parts of optimization theory. Papers considered for publication must be significant at both the mathematical level and the level of applications or potential applications. Papers containing mostly routine mathematics or those with no discernible connection to control and systems theory or optimization will not be considered for publication. From time to time, the journal will also publish authoritative surveys of important subject areas in control theory and optimization whose level of maturity permits a clear and unified exposition.
The broad areas mentioned above are intended to encompass a wide range of mathematical techniques and scientific, engineering, economic, and industrial applications. These include stochastic and deterministic methods in control, estimation, and identification of systems; modeling and realization of complex control systems; the numerical analysis and related computational methodology of control processes and allied issues; and the development of mathematical theories and techniques that give new insights into old problems or provide the basis for further progress in control theory and optimization. Within the field of optimization, the journal focuses on the parts that are relevant to dynamic and control systems. Contributions to numerical methodology are also welcome in accordance with these aims, especially as related to large-scale problems and decomposition as well as to fundamental questions of convergence and approximation.