单独治疗还是集体治疗:如何有针对性地使用抗菌剂来限制呼吸道病原体在肉牛中的传播?

Baptiste Sorin-Dupont, Antoine Poyard, Sebastien Assie, Sebastien Picault, Pauline Ezanno
{"title":"单独治疗还是集体治疗:如何有针对性地使用抗菌剂来限制呼吸道病原体在肉牛中的传播?","authors":"Baptiste Sorin-Dupont, Antoine Poyard, Sebastien Assie, Sebastien Picault, Pauline Ezanno","doi":"arxiv-2408.16269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overuse of antibiotics has become a major global concern due to its role\nin diminishing treatment effectiveness and positively selecting\nantibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. This issue is particularly important in\nthe beef cattle sector, where Bovine Respiratory Diseases (BRD) impose\nsignificant economic and welfare burdens. BRD are complex, multifactorial\nconditions primarily affecting young calves and feedlot cattle, caused by a\ncombination of viral and bacterial pathogens, environmental factors, and\nstressors. Despite efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU), the cattle\nproduction system remains heavily reliant on antibiotics to control BRD, often\nthrough the implementation of collective treatments to prevent outbreaks. This\nstudy aimed at evaluating the impact of various treatment practices on the\nspread of BRD, specifically focusing on criteria for implementing collective\ntreatments. Using a mechanistic stochastic model, we simulated the spread of\n\\textit{Mannheimia haemolytica} in a multi-pen fattening operation under\nsixteen different scenarios, considering pen composition, individual risk\nlevels, and treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that an alternative\ncriterion for collective treatments based on the speed of the disease spread,\ncould reduce BRD incidence and AMU more effectively than conventional methods.\nThis research highlights the importance of responsible treatment practices and\nthe potential benefits of novel criteria for collective treatment strategies in\nimproving animal health. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for transparency on\nthe exposure to risk factors along the production chain.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual or collective treatments: how to target antimicrobial use to limit the spread of respiratory pathogens among beef cattle?\",\"authors\":\"Baptiste Sorin-Dupont, Antoine Poyard, Sebastien Assie, Sebastien Picault, Pauline Ezanno\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.16269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overuse of antibiotics has become a major global concern due to its role\\nin diminishing treatment effectiveness and positively selecting\\nantibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. This issue is particularly important in\\nthe beef cattle sector, where Bovine Respiratory Diseases (BRD) impose\\nsignificant economic and welfare burdens. BRD are complex, multifactorial\\nconditions primarily affecting young calves and feedlot cattle, caused by a\\ncombination of viral and bacterial pathogens, environmental factors, and\\nstressors. Despite efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU), the cattle\\nproduction system remains heavily reliant on antibiotics to control BRD, often\\nthrough the implementation of collective treatments to prevent outbreaks. This\\nstudy aimed at evaluating the impact of various treatment practices on the\\nspread of BRD, specifically focusing on criteria for implementing collective\\ntreatments. Using a mechanistic stochastic model, we simulated the spread of\\n\\\\textit{Mannheimia haemolytica} in a multi-pen fattening operation under\\nsixteen different scenarios, considering pen composition, individual risk\\nlevels, and treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that an alternative\\ncriterion for collective treatments based on the speed of the disease spread,\\ncould reduce BRD incidence and AMU more effectively than conventional methods.\\nThis research highlights the importance of responsible treatment practices and\\nthe potential benefits of novel criteria for collective treatment strategies in\\nimproving animal health. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for transparency on\\nthe exposure to risk factors along the production chain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.16269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.16269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素的过度使用已成为全球关注的一个主要问题,因为它降低了治疗效果,并导致耐抗生素细菌菌株的产生。这一问题在肉牛行业尤为重要,因为牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)给肉牛带来了巨大的经济和福利负担。牛呼吸道疾病是一种复杂的多因素疾病,主要影响幼犊和饲养场的牛,由病毒和细菌病原体、环境因素和应激因素共同引起。尽管努力减少抗菌素的使用(AMU),但养牛系统仍然严重依赖抗生素来控制 BRD,并通过实施集体治疗来防止疫情爆发。本研究旨在评估各种治疗方法对 BRD 传播的影响,特别关注实施集体治疗的标准。我们使用一个机理随机模型,模拟了在16种不同情况下,多栏育肥操作中肉毒杆菌(Mannheimia haemolytica)的传播情况,其中考虑了猪栏组成、个体风险水平和治疗策略。我们的研究结果表明,与传统方法相比,基于疾病传播速度的集体治疗替代标准能更有效地降低BRD发病率和AMU。这项研究强调了负责任的治疗方法的重要性,以及集体治疗策略新标准在改善动物健康方面的潜在益处。此外,该研究还强调了生产链中风险因素暴露透明度的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual or collective treatments: how to target antimicrobial use to limit the spread of respiratory pathogens among beef cattle?
The overuse of antibiotics has become a major global concern due to its role in diminishing treatment effectiveness and positively selecting antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. This issue is particularly important in the beef cattle sector, where Bovine Respiratory Diseases (BRD) impose significant economic and welfare burdens. BRD are complex, multifactorial conditions primarily affecting young calves and feedlot cattle, caused by a combination of viral and bacterial pathogens, environmental factors, and stressors. Despite efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU), the cattle production system remains heavily reliant on antibiotics to control BRD, often through the implementation of collective treatments to prevent outbreaks. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of various treatment practices on the spread of BRD, specifically focusing on criteria for implementing collective treatments. Using a mechanistic stochastic model, we simulated the spread of \textit{Mannheimia haemolytica} in a multi-pen fattening operation under sixteen different scenarios, considering pen composition, individual risk levels, and treatment strategies. Our findings suggest that an alternative criterion for collective treatments based on the speed of the disease spread, could reduce BRD incidence and AMU more effectively than conventional methods. This research highlights the importance of responsible treatment practices and the potential benefits of novel criteria for collective treatment strategies in improving animal health. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for transparency on the exposure to risk factors along the production chain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological arrow of time: Emergence of tangled information hierarchies and self-modelling dynamics k-mer-based approaches to bridging pangenomics and population genetics A weather-driven mathematical model of Culex population abundance and the impact of vector control interventions Dynamics of solutions to a multi-patch epidemic model with a saturation incidence mechanism Higher-order interactions in random Lotka-Volterra communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1