生物学和机器学习中的电路设计I. 随机网络和降维

Steven A. Frank
{"title":"生物学和机器学习中的电路设计I. 随机网络和降维","authors":"Steven A. Frank","doi":"arxiv-2408.09604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A biological circuit is a neural or biochemical cascade, taking inputs and\nproducing outputs. How have biological circuits learned to solve environmental\nchallenges over the history of life? The answer certainly follows Dobzhansky's\nfamous quote that ``nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of\nevolution.'' But that quote leaves out the mechanistic basis by which natural\nselection's trial-and-error learning happens, which is exactly what we have to\nunderstand. How does the learning process that designs biological circuits\nactually work? How much insight can we gain about the form and function of\nbiological circuits by studying the processes that have made those circuits?\nBecause life's circuits must often solve the same problems as those faced by\nmachine learning, such as environmental tracking, homeostatic control,\ndimensional reduction, or classification, we can begin by considering how\nmachine learning designs computational circuits to solve problems. We can then\nask: How much insight do those computational circuits provide about the design\nof biological circuits? How much does biology differ from computers in the\nparticular circuit designs that it uses to solve problems? This article steps\nthrough two classic machine learning models to set the foundation for analyzing\nbroad questions about the design of biological circuits. One insight is the\nsurprising power of randomly connected networks. Another is the central role of\ninternal models of the environment embedded within biological circuits,\nillustrated by a model of dimensional reduction and trend prediction. Overall,\nmany challenges in biology have machine learning analogs, suggesting hypotheses\nabout how biology's circuits are designed.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circuit design in biology and machine learning. I. Random networks and dimensional reduction\",\"authors\":\"Steven A. Frank\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.09604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A biological circuit is a neural or biochemical cascade, taking inputs and\\nproducing outputs. How have biological circuits learned to solve environmental\\nchallenges over the history of life? The answer certainly follows Dobzhansky's\\nfamous quote that ``nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of\\nevolution.'' But that quote leaves out the mechanistic basis by which natural\\nselection's trial-and-error learning happens, which is exactly what we have to\\nunderstand. How does the learning process that designs biological circuits\\nactually work? How much insight can we gain about the form and function of\\nbiological circuits by studying the processes that have made those circuits?\\nBecause life's circuits must often solve the same problems as those faced by\\nmachine learning, such as environmental tracking, homeostatic control,\\ndimensional reduction, or classification, we can begin by considering how\\nmachine learning designs computational circuits to solve problems. We can then\\nask: How much insight do those computational circuits provide about the design\\nof biological circuits? How much does biology differ from computers in the\\nparticular circuit designs that it uses to solve problems? This article steps\\nthrough two classic machine learning models to set the foundation for analyzing\\nbroad questions about the design of biological circuits. One insight is the\\nsurprising power of randomly connected networks. Another is the central role of\\ninternal models of the environment embedded within biological circuits,\\nillustrated by a model of dimensional reduction and trend prediction. Overall,\\nmany challenges in biology have machine learning analogs, suggesting hypotheses\\nabout how biology's circuits are designed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物回路是一个神经或生化级联,接受输入并产生输出。在生命的历史长河中,生物回路是如何学会解决环境挑战的呢?答案当然是杜布赞斯基的名言:"除了进化,生物学中没有任何东西是有意义的。但这句话忽略了自然选择的试错学习发生的机理基础,而这正是我们必须理解的。设计生物电路的学习过程究竟是如何进行的?因为生命电路通常必须解决与机器学习所面临的相同的问题,如环境跟踪、同源控制、降维或分类等,所以我们可以首先考虑机器学习如何设计计算电路来解决问题。然后我们可以问:这些计算电路为生物电路的设计提供了多少启示?生物学在用于解决问题的特定电路设计方面与计算机有多大不同?本文通过两个经典的机器学习模型,为分析有关生物电路设计的广泛问题奠定基础。其中一个洞察是随机连接网络的惊人力量。另一个启示是嵌入生物电路中的环境内部模型的核心作用,并通过一个降维和趋势预测模型加以说明。总之,生物学中的许多挑战都与机器学习类似,它们提出了关于生物学电路如何设计的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Circuit design in biology and machine learning. I. Random networks and dimensional reduction
A biological circuit is a neural or biochemical cascade, taking inputs and producing outputs. How have biological circuits learned to solve environmental challenges over the history of life? The answer certainly follows Dobzhansky's famous quote that ``nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.'' But that quote leaves out the mechanistic basis by which natural selection's trial-and-error learning happens, which is exactly what we have to understand. How does the learning process that designs biological circuits actually work? How much insight can we gain about the form and function of biological circuits by studying the processes that have made those circuits? Because life's circuits must often solve the same problems as those faced by machine learning, such as environmental tracking, homeostatic control, dimensional reduction, or classification, we can begin by considering how machine learning designs computational circuits to solve problems. We can then ask: How much insight do those computational circuits provide about the design of biological circuits? How much does biology differ from computers in the particular circuit designs that it uses to solve problems? This article steps through two classic machine learning models to set the foundation for analyzing broad questions about the design of biological circuits. One insight is the surprising power of randomly connected networks. Another is the central role of internal models of the environment embedded within biological circuits, illustrated by a model of dimensional reduction and trend prediction. Overall, many challenges in biology have machine learning analogs, suggesting hypotheses about how biology's circuits are designed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological arrow of time: Emergence of tangled information hierarchies and self-modelling dynamics k-mer-based approaches to bridging pangenomics and population genetics A weather-driven mathematical model of Culex population abundance and the impact of vector control interventions Dynamics of solutions to a multi-patch epidemic model with a saturation incidence mechanism Higher-order interactions in random Lotka-Volterra communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1