ASTCT 关于检测和治疗捐献者特异性抗 HLA 抗体患者的共识建议。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.005
Piyanuch Kongtim,Pongthep Vittayawacharin,Jun Zou,Samer Srour,Brian Shaffer,Roman M Shapiro,Ankur Varma,Joseph McGuirk,Bhagirathbhai R Dholaria,Shannon R McCurdy,Amy E DeZern,Nelli Bejanyan,Asad Bashey,Sabine Furst,Luca Castagna,Jacopo Mariotti,Annalisa Ruggeri,Rebeca Bailen,Takanori Teshima,Huang Xiao-Jun,Carmen Bonfim,Fleur Aung,Kai Cao,Paul A Carpenter,Mehdi Hamadani,Medhat Askar,Marcelo Fernandez-Vina,Alin Girnita,Stefan O Ciurea
{"title":"ASTCT 关于检测和治疗捐献者特异性抗 HLA 抗体患者的共识建议。","authors":"Piyanuch Kongtim,Pongthep Vittayawacharin,Jun Zou,Samer Srour,Brian Shaffer,Roman M Shapiro,Ankur Varma,Joseph McGuirk,Bhagirathbhai R Dholaria,Shannon R McCurdy,Amy E DeZern,Nelli Bejanyan,Asad Bashey,Sabine Furst,Luca Castagna,Jacopo Mariotti,Annalisa Ruggeri,Rebeca Bailen,Takanori Teshima,Huang Xiao-Jun,Carmen Bonfim,Fleur Aung,Kai Cao,Paul A Carpenter,Mehdi Hamadani,Medhat Askar,Marcelo Fernandez-Vina,Alin Girnita,Stefan O Ciurea","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Piyanuch Kongtim,Pongthep Vittayawacharin,Jun Zou,Samer Srour,Brian Shaffer,Roman M Shapiro,Ankur Varma,Joseph McGuirk,Bhagirathbhai R Dholaria,Shannon R McCurdy,Amy E DeZern,Nelli Bejanyan,Asad Bashey,Sabine Furst,Luca Castagna,Jacopo Mariotti,Annalisa Ruggeri,Rebeca Bailen,Takanori Teshima,Huang Xiao-Jun,Carmen Bonfim,Fleur Aung,Kai Cao,Paul A Carpenter,Mehdi Hamadani,Medhat Askar,Marcelo Fernandez-Vina,Alin Girnita,Stefan O Ciurea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

捐献者特异性抗-HLA抗体(DSA)是导致移植失败的重要原因,可能会对使用HLA不匹配异体移植物接受异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)患者的生存结果产生负面影响。不同研究的DSA发生率各不相同,取决于个体因素、检测或鉴定方法以及临床相关阈值。尽管通过多重微珠阵列进行的 DSA 检测仍是半定量的,但它已被大多数移植中心广泛采用为标准检测方法。确定同种异体排斥风险的其他检测可包括自然构型的 HLA 抗原检测(如流式细胞交叉配型)和/或抗体结合检测(如 C1q 检测)。DSA水平较低(20,000 MFI)的患者可能面临很高的移植失败风险,尽管目前有各种疗法。相比之下,对于中度或高度 DSA 患者,脱敏疗法可成功降低 DSA 水平并提高供体细胞移植率,其疗效与无 DSA 患者相当。治疗方法主要是经验性的多模式治疗,包括清除、中和和阻断抗体,以及抑制抗体产生以防止补体级联激活。脱敏方案是根据多中心积累的经验制定的,但目前仍缺乏前瞻性多中心研究。大多数患者需要包括血浆置换在内的全强度方案,而对于DSA水平较低、C1q和/或流式细胞术交叉配型阴性的患者,仅依靠利妥昔单抗和静脉注射免疫球蛋白的方案可能就足够了。在造血干细胞移植前后监测DSA水平,可在干细胞输注后DSA水平持续较高时指导先期治疗。本文旨在规范目前的循证实践,并制定未来发展方向,以改善现有知识,推进异基因造血干细胞移植受者中这种相对罕见但潜在严重并发症的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies.
Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Advanced Practice Providers in Cellular Therapy: survey results from the ASTCT APP Special Interest Group exploring clinical roles, compensation and job satisfaction. Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in England: HCRU and associated costs in patients with cGvHD in England. Superior survival after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with low-dose ATG compared to low-dose TBI in myeloablative fludarabine/busulfan-based regimen for MDS on behalf of the adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT. N-803, an IL-15 superagonist complex as maintenance therapy after allogeneic donor stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome; a Phase 2 trial. Biologically Randomized Comparison of Haploidentical Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related Donor Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1