头颈癌中 PD-L1 检测方法的比较

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.pathol.2024.06.006
Ji-Seon Jeong, Uiree Jo, Gyuheon Choi, Halim Song, Kyung-Ja Cho, Joon Seon Song
{"title":"头颈癌中 PD-L1 检测方法的比较","authors":"Ji-Seon Jeong,&nbsp;Uiree Jo,&nbsp;Gyuheon Choi,&nbsp;Halim Song,&nbsp;Kyung-Ja Cho,&nbsp;Joon Seon Song","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Given the range of antibodies and platforms for PD-L1 testing, it is essential to understand the performance of different staining and scoring methods. PD-L1 expression in 156 head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (HNmSCC) cases at Asan Medical Center was assessed using 106 tissue microarray (TMA) cores and 50 whole slides. Three standardised PD-L1 assays (22C3 pharmDx, SP263, and 28-8 pharmDx) and one laboratory-developed test (22C3 LDT) were evaluated: the combined positive score (CPS) with ≥1, ≥20, and ≥50 cut-offs, and the tumour positive score (TPS) with ≥1%, ≥20%, ≥50% cut-offs. Concordance on a continuous scale among the assays was good to excellent for CPS [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) range 0.73–0.94] and TPS (ICC range 0.70–0.94) and in both TMA and whole slides cohorts. Stratification by variable cut-offs demonstrated moderate to good agreement among most assays, as analysed by Gwet's AC1. PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with tumour location using the 22C3 pharmDx assay (CPS, <em>p</em>=0.014; TPS, <em>p</em>=0.033). Notable concordance was found among PD-L1 assays, suggesting their potential interchangeability in HNmSCC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":"56 7","pages":"Pages 969-981"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of PD-L1 assays in head and neck carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Seon Jeong,&nbsp;Uiree Jo,&nbsp;Gyuheon Choi,&nbsp;Halim Song,&nbsp;Kyung-Ja Cho,&nbsp;Joon Seon Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Given the range of antibodies and platforms for PD-L1 testing, it is essential to understand the performance of different staining and scoring methods. PD-L1 expression in 156 head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (HNmSCC) cases at Asan Medical Center was assessed using 106 tissue microarray (TMA) cores and 50 whole slides. Three standardised PD-L1 assays (22C3 pharmDx, SP263, and 28-8 pharmDx) and one laboratory-developed test (22C3 LDT) were evaluated: the combined positive score (CPS) with ≥1, ≥20, and ≥50 cut-offs, and the tumour positive score (TPS) with ≥1%, ≥20%, ≥50% cut-offs. Concordance on a continuous scale among the assays was good to excellent for CPS [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) range 0.73–0.94] and TPS (ICC range 0.70–0.94) and in both TMA and whole slides cohorts. Stratification by variable cut-offs demonstrated moderate to good agreement among most assays, as analysed by Gwet's AC1. PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with tumour location using the 22C3 pharmDx assay (CPS, <em>p</em>=0.014; TPS, <em>p</em>=0.033). Notable concordance was found among PD-L1 assays, suggesting their potential interchangeability in HNmSCC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology\",\"volume\":\"56 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 969-981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524002071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524002071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达是头颈部鳞状细胞癌免疫检查点抑制剂的预测性生物标记物。鉴于用于检测 PD-L1 的抗体和平台种类繁多,了解不同染色和评分方法的性能至关重要。我们使用106个TMA核芯和50张完整切片评估了牙山医疗中心156例头颈部粘膜鳞状细胞癌(HNmSCC)的PD-L1表达情况。评估了三种标准化的 PD-L1 检测方法(22C3 pharmDx、SP263 和 28-8 pharmDx)和一种实验室开发的检测方法(22C3 LDT):≥1、≥20 和≥50 分界点的联合阳性评分 (CPS),以及≥1%、≥20% 和≥50% 分界点的肿瘤阳性评分 (TPS)。CPS[类内相关系数(ICC)范围为0.73-0.94]和TPS(ICC范围为0.70-0.94)以及TMA和全切片队列中的检测方法的连续一致性从良好到极佳。根据 Gwet's AC1 分析,按变量临界值进行的分层显示,大多数检测方法之间的一致性为中等至良好。使用 22C3 pharmDx 检测法,PD-L1 表达与肿瘤位置有明显相关性(CPS,=0.014;TPS,=0.033)。PD-L1 检测方法之间存在明显的一致性,这表明它们在 HNmSCC 中具有潜在的互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of PD-L1 assays in head and neck carcinoma
Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Given the range of antibodies and platforms for PD-L1 testing, it is essential to understand the performance of different staining and scoring methods. PD-L1 expression in 156 head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (HNmSCC) cases at Asan Medical Center was assessed using 106 tissue microarray (TMA) cores and 50 whole slides. Three standardised PD-L1 assays (22C3 pharmDx, SP263, and 28-8 pharmDx) and one laboratory-developed test (22C3 LDT) were evaluated: the combined positive score (CPS) with ≥1, ≥20, and ≥50 cut-offs, and the tumour positive score (TPS) with ≥1%, ≥20%, ≥50% cut-offs. Concordance on a continuous scale among the assays was good to excellent for CPS [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) range 0.73–0.94] and TPS (ICC range 0.70–0.94) and in both TMA and whole slides cohorts. Stratification by variable cut-offs demonstrated moderate to good agreement among most assays, as analysed by Gwet's AC1. PD-L1 expression was significantly correlated with tumour location using the 22C3 pharmDx assay (CPS, p=0.014; TPS, p=0.033). Notable concordance was found among PD-L1 assays, suggesting their potential interchangeability in HNmSCC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
期刊最新文献
A rare case of coccidioidomycosis in Singapore and challenges faced with laboratory diagnosis in a non-endemic area. New challenges for HIV testing in the setting of long-acting cabotegravir pre-exposure prophylaxis. Unexpected concurrent B-lymphoblastic leukaemia and untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia presenting as worsening thrombocytopenia: a rare case report. Evaluation of a customised Sensititre YeastOne plate containing isavuconazole for antifungal susceptibility testing in Singapore. Pathologists' integration of prior biopsies of women with germline PTEN mutations may expedite the identification of this rare cancer predisposition syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1