在结肠直肠癌高风险手术中使用荧光输尿管导管进行输尿管可视化的效用和挑战

Shunjin Ryu, Yuta Imaizumi, Shunsuke Nakashima, Hyuga Kawakubo, Hironari Kawai, Takehiro Kobayashi, Ryusuke Ito, Yukio Nakabayashi
{"title":"在结肠直肠癌高风险手术中使用荧光输尿管导管进行输尿管可视化的效用和挑战","authors":"Shunjin Ryu, Yuta Imaizumi, Shunsuke Nakashima, Hyuga Kawakubo, Hironari Kawai, Takehiro Kobayashi, Ryusuke Ito, Yukio Nakabayashi","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11211-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Ureteral injury occurs in 0.3–1.5% of colorectal cancer surgeries. Devices to visualize the ureteral course and avoid ureteral injury are required for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The NIRC™ fluorescent ureteral catheter (FUC) is a versatile ureteral visualization device currently available in Japan that can be used in combination with a variety of laparoscopic and robotic systems. In this study, we examined the outcomes of high-risk patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with FUC insertion.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>One hundred forty-one patients who underwent MIS for colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer recurrence at our institute between January 2021 and May 2024 underwent preoperative FUC insertion because of the high risk of ureteral injury and surgical difficulty. For these patients, patient background data and short-term outcomes were examined. The results are expressed as the median and interquartile range.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Age, 70 [60–78]; M:F(n), 84:57; BMI, 22.1 [19.7–24.7]; T4 (TNM classification), 52 cases (36.9%); preoperative intestinal obstruction, 45 cases (31.9%); abscess formation, 30 cases (21%); surgical history, 70 cases (50%); recurrent cancer, 14 cases (9.9%); preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, 28 cases (19.9%); time required for FUC insertion, 12 [9–19] minutes; operation time, 412 [309–552] minutes; blood loss, 10 [5–30] ml; open conversion, 0 cases; postoperative hospitalization, 12 [9–17.5]; circumferential resection margins &lt; 1 mm (rectal surgery), 4/87 cases (4.6%); comorbidities, 0 ureteral injury, 1 urethral injury during FUC insertion (0.7%) and 16 CD Grade 3 or higher cases (11%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>FUC may improve the safety of MIS and reduce blood loss in addition to preventing ureteral injury and is expected to have oncological advantages for ensuring the margin of the tumor without fear of ureteral injury. However, the time required for and complications associated with FUC are challenging. New methods for less invasive and easier ureteral visualization may be needed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility and challenges of ureteral visualization using a fluorescent ureteral catheter in high risk surgeries for colorectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Shunjin Ryu, Yuta Imaizumi, Shunsuke Nakashima, Hyuga Kawakubo, Hironari Kawai, Takehiro Kobayashi, Ryusuke Ito, Yukio Nakabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-11211-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Ureteral injury occurs in 0.3–1.5% of colorectal cancer surgeries. Devices to visualize the ureteral course and avoid ureteral injury are required for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The NIRC™ fluorescent ureteral catheter (FUC) is a versatile ureteral visualization device currently available in Japan that can be used in combination with a variety of laparoscopic and robotic systems. In this study, we examined the outcomes of high-risk patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with FUC insertion.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>One hundred forty-one patients who underwent MIS for colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer recurrence at our institute between January 2021 and May 2024 underwent preoperative FUC insertion because of the high risk of ureteral injury and surgical difficulty. For these patients, patient background data and short-term outcomes were examined. The results are expressed as the median and interquartile range.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Age, 70 [60–78]; M:F(n), 84:57; BMI, 22.1 [19.7–24.7]; T4 (TNM classification), 52 cases (36.9%); preoperative intestinal obstruction, 45 cases (31.9%); abscess formation, 30 cases (21%); surgical history, 70 cases (50%); recurrent cancer, 14 cases (9.9%); preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, 28 cases (19.9%); time required for FUC insertion, 12 [9–19] minutes; operation time, 412 [309–552] minutes; blood loss, 10 [5–30] ml; open conversion, 0 cases; postoperative hospitalization, 12 [9–17.5]; circumferential resection margins &lt; 1 mm (rectal surgery), 4/87 cases (4.6%); comorbidities, 0 ureteral injury, 1 urethral injury during FUC insertion (0.7%) and 16 CD Grade 3 or higher cases (11%).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>FUC may improve the safety of MIS and reduce blood loss in addition to preventing ureteral injury and is expected to have oncological advantages for ensuring the margin of the tumor without fear of ureteral injury. However, the time required for and complications associated with FUC are challenging. New methods for less invasive and easier ureteral visualization may be needed.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":501625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11211-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11211-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景0.3%-1.5%的结直肠癌手术会造成输尿管损伤。微创手术 (MIS) 需要可视化输尿管走向和避免输尿管损伤的设备。NIRC™ 荧光输尿管导管(FUC)是目前日本市场上的一种多功能输尿管可视化设备,可与各种腹腔镜和机器人系统结合使用。方法 2021 年 1 月至 2024 年 5 月期间,在我院接受 MIS 治疗结直肠癌和结直肠癌复发的 141 例患者因输尿管损伤风险高和手术难度大而接受了术前插入 FUC 的手术。对这些患者的背景数据和短期疗效进行了研究。结果年龄,70 [60-78];男:女(n),84:57;体重指数,22.1 [19.7-24.7];T4(TNM 分类),52 例(36.9%);术前肠梗阻,45 例(31.9%);脓肿形成,30 例(21%);手术史,70 例(50%);复发癌症,14 例(9.9%);术前化疗放疗,28 例(19.9%);插入 FUC 所需的时间,12 [9-19] 分钟;手术时间,412 [309-552] 分钟;失血量,10 [5-30] 毫升;开放转换,0 例;术后住院,12 [9-17.结论FUC 除可防止输尿管损伤外,还可提高 MIS 的安全性并减少失血量,预计在确保肿瘤边缘而不必担心输尿管损伤方面具有肿瘤学优势。然而,FUC 所需的时间和相关并发症是一项挑战。可能需要采用创伤更小、更容易观察输尿管的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility and challenges of ureteral visualization using a fluorescent ureteral catheter in high risk surgeries for colorectal cancer

Background

Ureteral injury occurs in 0.3–1.5% of colorectal cancer surgeries. Devices to visualize the ureteral course and avoid ureteral injury are required for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The NIRC™ fluorescent ureteral catheter (FUC) is a versatile ureteral visualization device currently available in Japan that can be used in combination with a variety of laparoscopic and robotic systems. In this study, we examined the outcomes of high-risk patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with FUC insertion.

Methods

One hundred forty-one patients who underwent MIS for colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer recurrence at our institute between January 2021 and May 2024 underwent preoperative FUC insertion because of the high risk of ureteral injury and surgical difficulty. For these patients, patient background data and short-term outcomes were examined. The results are expressed as the median and interquartile range.

Results

Age, 70 [60–78]; M:F(n), 84:57; BMI, 22.1 [19.7–24.7]; T4 (TNM classification), 52 cases (36.9%); preoperative intestinal obstruction, 45 cases (31.9%); abscess formation, 30 cases (21%); surgical history, 70 cases (50%); recurrent cancer, 14 cases (9.9%); preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, 28 cases (19.9%); time required for FUC insertion, 12 [9–19] minutes; operation time, 412 [309–552] minutes; blood loss, 10 [5–30] ml; open conversion, 0 cases; postoperative hospitalization, 12 [9–17.5]; circumferential resection margins < 1 mm (rectal surgery), 4/87 cases (4.6%); comorbidities, 0 ureteral injury, 1 urethral injury during FUC insertion (0.7%) and 16 CD Grade 3 or higher cases (11%).

Conclusions

FUC may improve the safety of MIS and reduce blood loss in addition to preventing ureteral injury and is expected to have oncological advantages for ensuring the margin of the tumor without fear of ureteral injury. However, the time required for and complications associated with FUC are challenging. New methods for less invasive and easier ureteral visualization may be needed.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1