减少患有精神疾病的无家可归者频繁使用急诊室的策略:范围界定综述

Rebekah A. Davis, Max Lookabaugh, Kimberly Christnacht, Robert Stegman
{"title":"减少患有精神疾病的无家可归者频繁使用急诊室的策略:范围界定综述","authors":"Rebekah A. Davis, Max Lookabaugh, Kimberly Christnacht, Robert Stegman","doi":"10.1007/s11524-024-00917-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The USA has some of the highest utilization rates of the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide, leading to increased healthcare costs, constrained resources, and fragmented care. Many of the highest ED utilizers are persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) and those with mental health conditions, with even higher use by those with comorbid social challenges. This study reviewed the literature assessing interventional approaches in the ED to minimize the burden of ED utilization by PEH with associated mental health conditions. We first conducted an informal literature review of high ED utilizers and their most common presenting symptoms. We then conducted a scoping review of articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; we used PubMed and Web of Science databases as well as Google Scholar. We screened the titles and abstracts of studies that evaluated programs that aimed to reduce ED usage by patients with mental illness who were also experiencing homelessness. Of the 1574 titles and abstracts screened, 49 full texts were examined for eligibility. Of those, 35 articles were excluded for a final count of 14 included studies. We found that the studies fell under two main interventional categories: housing support and care management. There were various approaches to reduce ED visits from PEH with mental illness around the world. Overall, these studies found varying degrees of success in reducing ED visits for both housing intervention and care management strategies. Comparison of these studies reveals that the success of related strategies like housing support often have different outcomes which can be attributed to the differences between the populations studied, previously available community resources, and other psychosocial factors affecting study participants. Overall, the most successful studies found that a tailored approach that addresses the unique needs of participants had the greatest impact on reducing ED visits and hospitalizations. Further research is needed to determine the best strategies for specific populations and how to promote health equity among PEH with associated mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies to Reduce Frequent Emergency Department Use among Persons Experiencing Homelessness with Mental Health Conditions: a Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Rebekah A. Davis, Max Lookabaugh, Kimberly Christnacht, Robert Stegman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11524-024-00917-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The USA has some of the highest utilization rates of the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide, leading to increased healthcare costs, constrained resources, and fragmented care. Many of the highest ED utilizers are persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) and those with mental health conditions, with even higher use by those with comorbid social challenges. This study reviewed the literature assessing interventional approaches in the ED to minimize the burden of ED utilization by PEH with associated mental health conditions. We first conducted an informal literature review of high ED utilizers and their most common presenting symptoms. We then conducted a scoping review of articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; we used PubMed and Web of Science databases as well as Google Scholar. We screened the titles and abstracts of studies that evaluated programs that aimed to reduce ED usage by patients with mental illness who were also experiencing homelessness. Of the 1574 titles and abstracts screened, 49 full texts were examined for eligibility. Of those, 35 articles were excluded for a final count of 14 included studies. We found that the studies fell under two main interventional categories: housing support and care management. There were various approaches to reduce ED visits from PEH with mental illness around the world. Overall, these studies found varying degrees of success in reducing ED visits for both housing intervention and care management strategies. Comparison of these studies reveals that the success of related strategies like housing support often have different outcomes which can be attributed to the differences between the populations studied, previously available community resources, and other psychosocial factors affecting study participants. Overall, the most successful studies found that a tailored approach that addresses the unique needs of participants had the greatest impact on reducing ED visits and hospitalizations. Further research is needed to determine the best strategies for specific populations and how to promote health equity among PEH with associated mental health conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00917-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-024-00917-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国是世界上急诊室(ED)使用率最高的国家之一,导致医疗成本增加、资源紧张和护理分散。许多急诊室使用率最高的患者是无家可归者(PEH)和精神疾病患者,而那些合并有社会问题的患者使用率更高。本研究对文献进行了回顾,评估了急诊室的干预方法,以最大限度地减轻无家可归者和伴有精神疾病者使用急诊室的负担。我们首先对急诊室高使用率人群及其最常见的症状进行了非正式的文献综述。然后,我们根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南对文章进行了范围界定;我们使用了 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库以及 Google Scholar。我们筛选了对旨在减少无家可归的精神疾病患者使用急诊室的项目进行评估的研究的标题和摘要。在筛选出的 1574 篇标题和摘要中,我们对 49 篇全文进行了资格审查。其中 35 篇文章被排除在外,最终纳入 14 项研究。我们发现,这些研究主要分为两个干预类别:住房支持和护理管理。世界各地有各种不同的方法来减少患有精神疾病的 PEH 的急诊就诊率。总体而言,这些研究发现,住房干预和护理管理策略在减少急诊室就诊率方面取得了不同程度的成功。对这些研究进行比较后发现,住房支持等相关策略的成功往往会产生不同的结果,这可归因于所研究人群的差异、先前可用的社区资源以及影响研究参与者的其他社会心理因素。总体而言,最成功的研究发现,针对参与者独特需求的定制方法对减少急诊室就诊和住院次数的影响最大。要确定针对特定人群的最佳策略,以及如何促进有相关心理健康问题的 PEH 的健康公平,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies to Reduce Frequent Emergency Department Use among Persons Experiencing Homelessness with Mental Health Conditions: a Scoping Review

The USA has some of the highest utilization rates of the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide, leading to increased healthcare costs, constrained resources, and fragmented care. Many of the highest ED utilizers are persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) and those with mental health conditions, with even higher use by those with comorbid social challenges. This study reviewed the literature assessing interventional approaches in the ED to minimize the burden of ED utilization by PEH with associated mental health conditions. We first conducted an informal literature review of high ED utilizers and their most common presenting symptoms. We then conducted a scoping review of articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; we used PubMed and Web of Science databases as well as Google Scholar. We screened the titles and abstracts of studies that evaluated programs that aimed to reduce ED usage by patients with mental illness who were also experiencing homelessness. Of the 1574 titles and abstracts screened, 49 full texts were examined for eligibility. Of those, 35 articles were excluded for a final count of 14 included studies. We found that the studies fell under two main interventional categories: housing support and care management. There were various approaches to reduce ED visits from PEH with mental illness around the world. Overall, these studies found varying degrees of success in reducing ED visits for both housing intervention and care management strategies. Comparison of these studies reveals that the success of related strategies like housing support often have different outcomes which can be attributed to the differences between the populations studied, previously available community resources, and other psychosocial factors affecting study participants. Overall, the most successful studies found that a tailored approach that addresses the unique needs of participants had the greatest impact on reducing ED visits and hospitalizations. Further research is needed to determine the best strategies for specific populations and how to promote health equity among PEH with associated mental health conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep Health among Community-Recruited Opioid-Using People Who Inject Drugs in Los Angeles, CA and Denver, CO Assessing the Burden of Electrical, Elevator, Heat, Hot Water, and Water Service Interruptions in New York City Public Housing Considering Residents’ Health and Well-Being in the Process of Social Housing Redevelopment: A Rapid Scoping Literature Review Strategies to Reduce Frequent Emergency Department Use among Persons Experiencing Homelessness with Mental Health Conditions: a Scoping Review Neighborhood Safety Concerns and the Onset of Depressive Symptoms Among Women: A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1