用人工智能写作:大学生从利用 ChatGPT 完成写作任务中学到的东西

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.3390/educsci14090976
Changzhao Wang, Stephen J. Aguilar, Jennifer S. Bankard, Eric Bui, Benjamin Nye
{"title":"用人工智能写作:大学生从利用 ChatGPT 完成写作任务中学到的东西","authors":"Changzhao Wang, Stephen J. Aguilar, Jennifer S. Bankard, Eric Bui, Benjamin Nye","doi":"10.3390/educsci14090976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To support the integration of AI in education, this empirical study investigated what lessons college students learned from using Generative AI for writing. We recruited 47 students in the United States from a university writing course. Students completed an assignment in which they used Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) to draft an application letter or personal statement. Data were collected using a survey of five open-ended questions about their writing process, what worked, what did not work, how to better write with AI, and general lessons learned. We applied thematic analysis and sentiment analysis methods to analyze students’ responses. Results show that (1) students went through multiple rounds of prompting; (2) students identified strengths of AI, such as connection to topic, template generation, and sentence quality; (3) the weaknesses of AI included general language, robotic tone and lacking emotion, lacking personal voice, and lacking critical thinking; (4) students wished to improve AI-generated writing by adding personal stories, connections to posting, feelings and thoughts, and deleting repetitive language; and (5) their overall attitudes toward AI tool were positive. We believe our findings can help relieve some concerns about cheating with AI. We also suggested strategies to regulate the use of AI.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing with AI: What College Students Learned from Utilizing ChatGPT for a Writing Assignment\",\"authors\":\"Changzhao Wang, Stephen J. Aguilar, Jennifer S. Bankard, Eric Bui, Benjamin Nye\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/educsci14090976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To support the integration of AI in education, this empirical study investigated what lessons college students learned from using Generative AI for writing. We recruited 47 students in the United States from a university writing course. Students completed an assignment in which they used Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) to draft an application letter or personal statement. Data were collected using a survey of five open-ended questions about their writing process, what worked, what did not work, how to better write with AI, and general lessons learned. We applied thematic analysis and sentiment analysis methods to analyze students’ responses. Results show that (1) students went through multiple rounds of prompting; (2) students identified strengths of AI, such as connection to topic, template generation, and sentence quality; (3) the weaknesses of AI included general language, robotic tone and lacking emotion, lacking personal voice, and lacking critical thinking; (4) students wished to improve AI-generated writing by adding personal stories, connections to posting, feelings and thoughts, and deleting repetitive language; and (5) their overall attitudes toward AI tool were positive. We believe our findings can help relieve some concerns about cheating with AI. We also suggested strategies to regulate the use of AI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了支持将人工智能融入教育,本实证研究调查了大学生从使用生成式人工智能写作中学到了哪些经验。我们从美国一所大学的写作课程中招募了 47 名学生。学生们完成了一项作业,使用生成式人工智能工具(如 ChatGPT)起草申请信或个人陈述。我们通过五道开放式问题的调查来收集数据,这些问题涉及他们的写作过程、哪些有效、哪些无效、如何更好地使用人工智能写作以及一般经验教训。我们采用主题分析和情感分析方法对学生的回答进行了分析。结果显示:(1) 学生经历了多轮提示;(2) 学生发现了人工智能的优点,如与主题的联系、模板生成和句子质量;(3) 人工智能的缺点包括语言笼统、机器人语气和缺乏情感、缺乏个人声音和缺乏批判性思维;(4) 学生希望通过添加个人故事、与张贴内容的联系、情感和想法以及删除重复性语言来改进人工智能生成的写作;(5) 他们对人工智能工具的总体态度是积极的。我们相信,我们的研究结果有助于减轻学生对人工智能作弊的担忧。我们还提出了规范人工智能使用的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writing with AI: What College Students Learned from Utilizing ChatGPT for a Writing Assignment
To support the integration of AI in education, this empirical study investigated what lessons college students learned from using Generative AI for writing. We recruited 47 students in the United States from a university writing course. Students completed an assignment in which they used Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) to draft an application letter or personal statement. Data were collected using a survey of five open-ended questions about their writing process, what worked, what did not work, how to better write with AI, and general lessons learned. We applied thematic analysis and sentiment analysis methods to analyze students’ responses. Results show that (1) students went through multiple rounds of prompting; (2) students identified strengths of AI, such as connection to topic, template generation, and sentence quality; (3) the weaknesses of AI included general language, robotic tone and lacking emotion, lacking personal voice, and lacking critical thinking; (4) students wished to improve AI-generated writing by adding personal stories, connections to posting, feelings and thoughts, and deleting repetitive language; and (5) their overall attitudes toward AI tool were positive. We believe our findings can help relieve some concerns about cheating with AI. We also suggested strategies to regulate the use of AI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Online Pedagogies and the Middle Grades: A Scoping Review of the Literature Self-Regulation Profiles of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers for Primary Education in Mathematical Problem-Solving Contexts Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience The Effects of Invented Spelling Instruction on Literacy Achievement and Writing Motivation Effectiveness of the Flipped Project-Based Learning Model Based on Moodle LMS to Improve Student Communication and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1