市县合并对城市土地绿化利用效率的影响:来自中国的证据

IF 3.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Frontiers in Environmental Science Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1418982
MengChao Zhao, Xiang Xiao, Yang Le
{"title":"市县合并对城市土地绿化利用效率的影响:来自中国的证据","authors":"MengChao Zhao, Xiang Xiao, Yang Le","doi":"10.3389/fenvs.2024.1418982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an urbanization effort propelled by administrative measures, city-county merger has been particularly prevalent in the administrative district adjustments of prefecture-level cities in China. However, there has been scant research focusing on the policy’s impact on the efficiency of green utilization of urban land. We selected panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2003 to 2020, employing the slack-based measure (SBM) model that accounts for undesirable outputs, in conjunction with the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) productivity index, to measure the efficiency of green land use in cities. Building on this, we utilized the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to investigate the impact of policies expanding cities through land leasing on the green utilization efficiency of urban land. Our findings indicate that the city-county merger has generally led to a decline in the efficiency of green utilization of urban land. Further mechanism analysis suggests that local governments’ excessive focus on land leasing for economic development, leading to a low-quality development model, is a significant factor contributing to the decline in green utilization efficiency of urban land. Specifically, the city-county merger policy indirectly reduces land green utilization efficiency by increasing industrial land leasing revenue, the number of industrial polluting enterprises, lowering the rationalization level of urban industrial structure, and raising the overachievement of urban economic growth targets. Further research reveals that the policy has heterogeneous impacts on land green utilization efficiency across different regions, city sizes, administrative levels, economic development levels, and urban planning types. The policy has a more significant inhibitory effect on land green utilization efficiency in non-eastern regions, smaller cities, peripheral cities, underdeveloped cities, and resource-based cities. Our study confirms that as a significant urbanization reform initiative, the effectiveness of the city-county merger still relies on the traditional extensive growth model based on land expansion, which is not conducive to enhancing the efficiency of green land use in cities.","PeriodicalId":12460,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of city-county mergers on urban land green utilization efficiency: evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"MengChao Zhao, Xiang Xiao, Yang Le\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fenvs.2024.1418982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As an urbanization effort propelled by administrative measures, city-county merger has been particularly prevalent in the administrative district adjustments of prefecture-level cities in China. However, there has been scant research focusing on the policy’s impact on the efficiency of green utilization of urban land. We selected panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2003 to 2020, employing the slack-based measure (SBM) model that accounts for undesirable outputs, in conjunction with the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) productivity index, to measure the efficiency of green land use in cities. Building on this, we utilized the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to investigate the impact of policies expanding cities through land leasing on the green utilization efficiency of urban land. Our findings indicate that the city-county merger has generally led to a decline in the efficiency of green utilization of urban land. Further mechanism analysis suggests that local governments’ excessive focus on land leasing for economic development, leading to a low-quality development model, is a significant factor contributing to the decline in green utilization efficiency of urban land. Specifically, the city-county merger policy indirectly reduces land green utilization efficiency by increasing industrial land leasing revenue, the number of industrial polluting enterprises, lowering the rationalization level of urban industrial structure, and raising the overachievement of urban economic growth targets. Further research reveals that the policy has heterogeneous impacts on land green utilization efficiency across different regions, city sizes, administrative levels, economic development levels, and urban planning types. The policy has a more significant inhibitory effect on land green utilization efficiency in non-eastern regions, smaller cities, peripheral cities, underdeveloped cities, and resource-based cities. Our study confirms that as a significant urbanization reform initiative, the effectiveness of the city-county merger still relies on the traditional extensive growth model based on land expansion, which is not conducive to enhancing the efficiency of green land use in cities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Environmental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1418982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1418982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一项以行政手段推进的城市化工作,市县合并在中国地级市的行政区划调整中尤为盛行。然而,有关该政策对城市土地绿色利用效率影响的研究却很少。我们选取了 2003 年至 2020 年中国地级市的面板数据,采用考虑不良产出的松弛计量(SBM)模型,结合马尔奎斯特-伦贝格尔(ML)生产率指数,测算城市绿地利用效率。在此基础上,我们利用交错差分(DID)模型研究了通过土地租赁扩大城市规模的政策对城市土地绿色利用效率的影响。研究结果表明,市县合并总体上导致了城市土地绿色利用效率的下降。进一步的机理分析表明,地方政府过度注重以土地租赁促进经济发展,导致低质量的发展模式,是导致城市土地绿色利用效率下降的重要因素。具体而言,市县合并政策通过增加工业用地租赁收入、增加工业污染企业数量、降低城市产业结构合理化水平、提高城市经济增长目标的超额完成率,间接降低了土地绿色利用效率。进一步研究发现,该政策对不同地区、不同城市规模、不同行政级别、不同经济发展水平、不同城市规划类型的土地绿色利用效率具有异质性影响。在非东部地区、小城市、边缘城市、欠发达城市和资源型城市,该政策对土地绿色利用效率的抑制作用更为明显。我们的研究证实,作为一项重要的城镇化改革举措,市县合并的成效仍然依赖于以土地扩张为基础的传统粗放型增长模式,不利于提高城市的土地绿色利用效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of city-county mergers on urban land green utilization efficiency: evidence from China
As an urbanization effort propelled by administrative measures, city-county merger has been particularly prevalent in the administrative district adjustments of prefecture-level cities in China. However, there has been scant research focusing on the policy’s impact on the efficiency of green utilization of urban land. We selected panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2003 to 2020, employing the slack-based measure (SBM) model that accounts for undesirable outputs, in conjunction with the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) productivity index, to measure the efficiency of green land use in cities. Building on this, we utilized the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to investigate the impact of policies expanding cities through land leasing on the green utilization efficiency of urban land. Our findings indicate that the city-county merger has generally led to a decline in the efficiency of green utilization of urban land. Further mechanism analysis suggests that local governments’ excessive focus on land leasing for economic development, leading to a low-quality development model, is a significant factor contributing to the decline in green utilization efficiency of urban land. Specifically, the city-county merger policy indirectly reduces land green utilization efficiency by increasing industrial land leasing revenue, the number of industrial polluting enterprises, lowering the rationalization level of urban industrial structure, and raising the overachievement of urban economic growth targets. Further research reveals that the policy has heterogeneous impacts on land green utilization efficiency across different regions, city sizes, administrative levels, economic development levels, and urban planning types. The policy has a more significant inhibitory effect on land green utilization efficiency in non-eastern regions, smaller cities, peripheral cities, underdeveloped cities, and resource-based cities. Our study confirms that as a significant urbanization reform initiative, the effectiveness of the city-county merger still relies on the traditional extensive growth model based on land expansion, which is not conducive to enhancing the efficiency of green land use in cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Frontiers in Environmental Science Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
2276
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Our natural world is experiencing a state of rapid change unprecedented in the presence of humans. The changes affect virtually all physical, chemical and biological systems on Earth. The interaction of these systems leads to tipping points, feedbacks and amplification of effects. In virtually all cases, the causes of environmental change can be traced to human activity through either direct interventions as a consequence of pollution, or through global warming from greenhouse case emissions. Well-formulated and internationally-relevant policies to mitigate the change, or adapt to the consequences, that will ensure our ability to thrive in the coming decades are badly needed. Without proper understanding of the processes involved, and deep understanding of the likely impacts of bad decisions or inaction, the security of food, water and energy is a risk. Left unchecked shortages of these basic commodities will lead to migration, global geopolitical tension and conflict. This represents the major challenge of our time. We are the first generation to appreciate the problem and we will be judged in future by our ability to determine and take the action necessary. Appropriate knowledge of the condition of our natural world, appreciation of the changes occurring, and predictions of how the future will develop are requisite to the definition and implementation of solutions. Frontiers in Environmental Science publishes research at the cutting edge of knowledge of our natural world and its various intersections with society. It bridges between the identification and measurement of change, comprehension of the processes responsible, and the measures needed to reduce their impact. Its aim is to assist the formulation of policies, by offering sound scientific evidence on environmental science, that will lead to a more inhabitable and sustainable world for the generations to come.
期刊最新文献
Spatial distribution of available phosphorus in surface road and trackway surface materials on a sheep farm in Ireland Heavy metal changes related to land use changes in a karst area: a case study in Changshun, Guizhou Province, China Long-term trends in water transparency of Tibetan Plateau lakes and the response to extreme climate events Carbon neutralization frontier tracking Occurrence, sustainable treatment technologies, potential sources, and future prospects of emerging pollutants in aquatic environments: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1