{"title":"心理健康护士的职业生活质量:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Runa Lobo, S. Pavan Kumar, Rofin TM","doi":"10.1111/inm.13424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The professional quality of life (ProQOL) is increasingly applied to nurses and is a measure of the positive and negative aspects of their work. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the level of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress (STS) in empirical studies. Electronic databases Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched on 7th February 2024, and the review followed PRISMA guidelines. The pooled estimate of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress mean scores using a random-effects model for meta-analyses was undertaken. R statistical software and the dmetar program were used to execute the analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's regression test. Twenty-four studies (sample size = 4274) were systematically reviewed and 18 studies (<i>n</i> = 3163) were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Burnout, secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction are found to be at moderate levels in this research. The qualitative analysis informs that variables such as healthy lifestyle, work environment and psychological resilience contribute towards optimum ProQOL scores. The pooled mean estimate was 32.79 (95% CI = 29.57–36) for compassion satisfaction, 24.99 (95% CI = 23.75–26.23) for burnout and 21.99 (95% CI = 18.93–25.06) for secondary traumatic stress, respectively. Mental health nurse managers need to address the factors in the work environment and promote interventions to enhance coping with burnout and STS. Subgroup analyses of country-based economies & regions and years revealed significant results.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"33 6","pages":"2005-2025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Quality of Life Among Mental Health Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Runa Lobo, S. Pavan Kumar, Rofin TM\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.13424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The professional quality of life (ProQOL) is increasingly applied to nurses and is a measure of the positive and negative aspects of their work. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the level of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress (STS) in empirical studies. Electronic databases Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched on 7th February 2024, and the review followed PRISMA guidelines. The pooled estimate of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress mean scores using a random-effects model for meta-analyses was undertaken. R statistical software and the dmetar program were used to execute the analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's regression test. Twenty-four studies (sample size = 4274) were systematically reviewed and 18 studies (<i>n</i> = 3163) were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Burnout, secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction are found to be at moderate levels in this research. The qualitative analysis informs that variables such as healthy lifestyle, work environment and psychological resilience contribute towards optimum ProQOL scores. The pooled mean estimate was 32.79 (95% CI = 29.57–36) for compassion satisfaction, 24.99 (95% CI = 23.75–26.23) for burnout and 21.99 (95% CI = 18.93–25.06) for secondary traumatic stress, respectively. Mental health nurse managers need to address the factors in the work environment and promote interventions to enhance coping with burnout and STS. Subgroup analyses of country-based economies & regions and years revealed significant results.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"2005-2025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13424\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
职业生活质量(ProQOL)越来越多地应用于护士,它是对护士工作的积极和消极方面的衡量。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了实证研究中同情满意度、职业倦怠和继发性创伤压力(STS)的水平。本研究于 2024 年 2 月 7 日检索了 Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science 等电子数据库,并遵循了 PRISMA 指南。使用荟萃分析随机效应模型对同情满意度、职业倦怠和二次创伤压力的平均得分进行了汇总估算。分析使用了 R 统计软件和 dmetar 程序。用 I2 统计量评估异质性,用 Egger 回归检验评估发表偏倚。系统回顾了 24 项研究(样本量 = 4274),并将 18 项研究(n = 3163)纳入荟萃分析。研究发现,职业倦怠、二次创伤压力和同情满意度处于中等水平。定性分析表明,健康的生活方式、工作环境和心理复原力等变量有助于获得最佳的 ProQOL 分数。综合平均估计值分别为:同情满意度为 32.79(95% CI = 29.57-36),职业倦怠为 24.99(95% CI = 23.75-26.23),继发性创伤压力为 21.99(95% CI = 18.93-25.06)。心理健康护士管理者需要解决工作环境中的各种因素,并促进干预措施的实施,以提高应对职业倦怠和STS的能力。对基于国家的经济& 地区和年份进行的分组分析显示了显著的结果。
Professional Quality of Life Among Mental Health Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The professional quality of life (ProQOL) is increasingly applied to nurses and is a measure of the positive and negative aspects of their work. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the level of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress (STS) in empirical studies. Electronic databases Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched on 7th February 2024, and the review followed PRISMA guidelines. The pooled estimate of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress mean scores using a random-effects model for meta-analyses was undertaken. R statistical software and the dmetar program were used to execute the analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I2 statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's regression test. Twenty-four studies (sample size = 4274) were systematically reviewed and 18 studies (n = 3163) were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Burnout, secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction are found to be at moderate levels in this research. The qualitative analysis informs that variables such as healthy lifestyle, work environment and psychological resilience contribute towards optimum ProQOL scores. The pooled mean estimate was 32.79 (95% CI = 29.57–36) for compassion satisfaction, 24.99 (95% CI = 23.75–26.23) for burnout and 21.99 (95% CI = 18.93–25.06) for secondary traumatic stress, respectively. Mental health nurse managers need to address the factors in the work environment and promote interventions to enhance coping with burnout and STS. Subgroup analyses of country-based economies & regions and years revealed significant results.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.