探索用户参与和平与冲突研究的最佳做法

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.13441
Thomas Bobo, Giuditta Fontana, Nino Kemoklidze
{"title":"探索用户参与和平与冲突研究的最佳做法","authors":"Thomas Bobo, Giuditta Fontana, Nino Kemoklidze","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peace and conflict scholars often engage in academic‐policy exchanges to <jats:italic>both</jats:italic> improve the rigour and relevance of their academic research <jats:italic>and</jats:italic> translate their findings into tangible policy and practical outcomes for peace and conflict resolution efforts. In a first effort of this kind, this paper explores best practices for user engagement in conflict and peace studies at three stages of academic research: identification of research questions, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of research findings. We draw on three strands of research: a review of academic literature on user engagement in conflict and peace studies, inductive thematic analysis of Impact Case Studies submitted to the 2021 UK Research Excellence Framework and experiential reflection on our own work as academics. We aim to provide practical suggestions based on concrete examples, before drawing more general conclusions on what makes for effective involvement of users in peace and conflict research. We find that the impact of specific activities hinges on their timing, format and continuity. We conclude that nurturing sustainable and mutually beneficial networks of partnerships based on mutual trust and open dialogue across professional cultures is key to effective and constructive user engagement in peace and conflict research.","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring best practices for user engagement in peace and conflict research\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Bobo, Giuditta Fontana, Nino Kemoklidze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.13441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peace and conflict scholars often engage in academic‐policy exchanges to <jats:italic>both</jats:italic> improve the rigour and relevance of their academic research <jats:italic>and</jats:italic> translate their findings into tangible policy and practical outcomes for peace and conflict resolution efforts. In a first effort of this kind, this paper explores best practices for user engagement in conflict and peace studies at three stages of academic research: identification of research questions, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of research findings. We draw on three strands of research: a review of academic literature on user engagement in conflict and peace studies, inductive thematic analysis of Impact Case Studies submitted to the 2021 UK Research Excellence Framework and experiential reflection on our own work as academics. We aim to provide practical suggestions based on concrete examples, before drawing more general conclusions on what makes for effective involvement of users in peace and conflict research. We find that the impact of specific activities hinges on their timing, format and continuity. We conclude that nurturing sustainable and mutually beneficial networks of partnerships based on mutual trust and open dialogue across professional cultures is key to effective and constructive user engagement in peace and conflict research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13441\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

和平与冲突学者经常参与学术与政策交流,以提高其学术研究的严谨性和相关性,并将其研究成果转化为和平与冲突解决努力的具体政策和实际成果。本文首次尝试在学术研究的三个阶段探讨用户参与冲突与和平研究的最佳实践:确定研究问题、收集和分析数据以及传播研究成果。我们借鉴了三方面的研究成果:关于用户参与冲突与和平研究的学术文献综述、对提交给 2021 年英国卓越研究框架的 "影响案例研究 "的归纳性专题分析以及对我们自身学术工作的经验反思。我们旨在根据具体实例提供实用建议,然后就用户如何有效参与和平与冲突研究得出更具普遍性的结论。我们发现,具体活动的影响取决于其时间、形式和连续性。我们的结论是,在跨专业文化的相互信任和公开对话的基础上,培育可持续和互惠互利的伙伴关系网络,是用户有效和建设性地参与和平与冲突研究的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring best practices for user engagement in peace and conflict research
Peace and conflict scholars often engage in academic‐policy exchanges to both improve the rigour and relevance of their academic research and translate their findings into tangible policy and practical outcomes for peace and conflict resolution efforts. In a first effort of this kind, this paper explores best practices for user engagement in conflict and peace studies at three stages of academic research: identification of research questions, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of research findings. We draw on three strands of research: a review of academic literature on user engagement in conflict and peace studies, inductive thematic analysis of Impact Case Studies submitted to the 2021 UK Research Excellence Framework and experiential reflection on our own work as academics. We aim to provide practical suggestions based on concrete examples, before drawing more general conclusions on what makes for effective involvement of users in peace and conflict research. We find that the impact of specific activities hinges on their timing, format and continuity. We conclude that nurturing sustainable and mutually beneficial networks of partnerships based on mutual trust and open dialogue across professional cultures is key to effective and constructive user engagement in peace and conflict research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Belt and Road Initiative, outward foreign direct investment and total factor productivity—Evidence from China Cutting-edge public space and community-building experiences from a user experience (UX) perspective – A multinational comparison Policy coordination and development in a VUCA world Collective leadership for VUCA: From theoretical exploratory study to knowledge creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1