多国医院患者对医疗和诊断领域人工智能的态度

Felix Busch, Lena Hoffmann, Lina Xu, Longjiang Zhang, Bin Hu, Ignacio García-Juárez, Liz N Toapanta-Yanchapaxi, Natalia Gorelik, Valérie Gorelik, Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo, Carlos Ferrarotti, Nguyen N Cuong, Chau AP Thi, Murat Tuncel, Gürsan Kaya, Sergio M Solis-Barquero, Maria C Mendez Avila, Nevena G Ivanova, Felipe C Kitamura, Karina YI Hayama, Monserrat L Puntunet Bates, Pedro Iturralde Torres, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Gilbert M Schwarz, Jochen G Hofstaetter, Michihiro Hide, Konagi Takeda, Barbara Perić, Gašper Pilko, Hans O Thulesius, Thomas A Lindow, Israel K Kolawole, Samuel Adegboyega Olatoke, Andrzej Grzybowski, Alexandru Corlateanu, Oana-Simina Iaconi, Ting Li, Izabela Domitrz, Katarzyna Kępczyńska, Matúš Mihalčin, Lenka Fašaneková, Tomasz Zatoński, Katarzyna Fułek, András Molnár, Stefani Maihoub, Zenewton A da Silva Gama, Luca Saba, Petros Sountoulides, Marcus R Makowski, Hugo JWL Aerts, Lisa C Adams, Keno K Bressem, COMFORT consortium
{"title":"多国医院患者对医疗和诊断领域人工智能的态度","authors":"Felix Busch, Lena Hoffmann, Lina Xu, Longjiang Zhang, Bin Hu, Ignacio García-Juárez, Liz N Toapanta-Yanchapaxi, Natalia Gorelik, Valérie Gorelik, Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo, Carlos Ferrarotti, Nguyen N Cuong, Chau AP Thi, Murat Tuncel, Gürsan Kaya, Sergio M Solis-Barquero, Maria C Mendez Avila, Nevena G Ivanova, Felipe C Kitamura, Karina YI Hayama, Monserrat L Puntunet Bates, Pedro Iturralde Torres, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Gilbert M Schwarz, Jochen G Hofstaetter, Michihiro Hide, Konagi Takeda, Barbara Perić, Gašper Pilko, Hans O Thulesius, Thomas A Lindow, Israel K Kolawole, Samuel Adegboyega Olatoke, Andrzej Grzybowski, Alexandru Corlateanu, Oana-Simina Iaconi, Ting Li, Izabela Domitrz, Katarzyna Kępczyńska, Matúš Mihalčin, Lenka Fašaneková, Tomasz Zatoński, Katarzyna Fułek, András Molnár, Stefani Maihoub, Zenewton A da Silva Gama, Luca Saba, Petros Sountoulides, Marcus R Makowski, Hugo JWL Aerts, Lisa C Adams, Keno K Bressem, COMFORT consortium","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.01.24312016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The successful implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is dependent upon the acceptance of this technology by key stakeholders, particularly patients, who are the primary beneficiaries of AI-driven outcomes. This international, multicenter, cross-sectional study assessed the attitudes of hospital patients towards AI in healthcare across 43 countries. A total of 13806 patients at 74 hospitals were surveyed between February and November 2023, with 64.8% from the Global North and 35.2% from the Global South. The findings indicate a predominantly favorable general view of AI in healthcare, with 57.6% of respondents expressing a positive attitude. However, attitudes exhibited notable variation based on demographic characteristics, health status, and technological literacy. Female respondents and those with poorer health status exhibited fewer positive attitudes towards AI use in medicine. Conversely, higher levels of AI knowledge and frequent use of technology devices were associated with more positive attitudes. It is noteworthy that less than half of the participants expressed positive attitudes regarding all items pertaining to trust in AI. The lowest level of trust was observed for the accuracy of AI in providing information regarding treatment responses. Patients exhibited a strong preference for explainable AI and physician-led decision-making, even if it meant slightly compromised accuracy. This large-scale, multinational study provides a comprehensive perspective on patient attitudes towards AI in healthcare across six continents. Findings suggest a need for tailored AI implementation strategies that consider patient demographics, health status, and preferences for explainable AI and physician oversight. All study data has been made publicly available to encourage replication and further investigation.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multinational attitudes towards AI in healthcare and diagnostics among hospital patients\",\"authors\":\"Felix Busch, Lena Hoffmann, Lina Xu, Longjiang Zhang, Bin Hu, Ignacio García-Juárez, Liz N Toapanta-Yanchapaxi, Natalia Gorelik, Valérie Gorelik, Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo, Carlos Ferrarotti, Nguyen N Cuong, Chau AP Thi, Murat Tuncel, Gürsan Kaya, Sergio M Solis-Barquero, Maria C Mendez Avila, Nevena G Ivanova, Felipe C Kitamura, Karina YI Hayama, Monserrat L Puntunet Bates, Pedro Iturralde Torres, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Gilbert M Schwarz, Jochen G Hofstaetter, Michihiro Hide, Konagi Takeda, Barbara Perić, Gašper Pilko, Hans O Thulesius, Thomas A Lindow, Israel K Kolawole, Samuel Adegboyega Olatoke, Andrzej Grzybowski, Alexandru Corlateanu, Oana-Simina Iaconi, Ting Li, Izabela Domitrz, Katarzyna Kępczyńska, Matúš Mihalčin, Lenka Fašaneková, Tomasz Zatoński, Katarzyna Fułek, András Molnár, Stefani Maihoub, Zenewton A da Silva Gama, Luca Saba, Petros Sountoulides, Marcus R Makowski, Hugo JWL Aerts, Lisa C Adams, Keno K Bressem, COMFORT consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.01.24312016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The successful implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is dependent upon the acceptance of this technology by key stakeholders, particularly patients, who are the primary beneficiaries of AI-driven outcomes. This international, multicenter, cross-sectional study assessed the attitudes of hospital patients towards AI in healthcare across 43 countries. A total of 13806 patients at 74 hospitals were surveyed between February and November 2023, with 64.8% from the Global North and 35.2% from the Global South. The findings indicate a predominantly favorable general view of AI in healthcare, with 57.6% of respondents expressing a positive attitude. However, attitudes exhibited notable variation based on demographic characteristics, health status, and technological literacy. Female respondents and those with poorer health status exhibited fewer positive attitudes towards AI use in medicine. Conversely, higher levels of AI knowledge and frequent use of technology devices were associated with more positive attitudes. It is noteworthy that less than half of the participants expressed positive attitudes regarding all items pertaining to trust in AI. The lowest level of trust was observed for the accuracy of AI in providing information regarding treatment responses. Patients exhibited a strong preference for explainable AI and physician-led decision-making, even if it meant slightly compromised accuracy. This large-scale, multinational study provides a comprehensive perspective on patient attitudes towards AI in healthcare across six continents. Findings suggest a need for tailored AI implementation strategies that consider patient demographics, health status, and preferences for explainable AI and physician oversight. All study data has been made publicly available to encourage replication and further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.01.24312016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.01.24312016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的成功应用取决于主要利益相关者对该技术的接受程度,尤其是患者,他们是人工智能成果的主要受益者。这项国际多中心横断面研究评估了 43 个国家的医院患者对医疗保健领域人工智能的态度。在 2023 年 2 月至 11 月期间,共有 74 家医院的 13806 名患者接受了调查,其中 64.8% 来自全球北方地区,35.2% 来自全球南方地区。调查结果表明,人们对医疗保健领域的人工智能普遍持赞成态度,57.6%的受访者表达了积极的态度。然而,根据人口特征、健康状况和技术素养的不同,人们的态度也表现出明显的差异。女性受访者和健康状况较差的受访者对人工智能在医疗中的应用表现出的积极态度较少。相反,人工智能知识水平较高和经常使用技术设备的受访者则表现出更积极的态度。值得注意的是,只有不到一半的参与者对有关人工智能信任度的所有项目都表示了积极的态度。在人工智能提供治疗反应信息的准确性方面,信任度最低。患者对可解释的人工智能和医生主导的决策表现出强烈的偏好,即使这意味着准确性会略微打折扣。这项大规模的跨国研究全面透视了六大洲患者对医疗保健领域人工智能的态度。研究结果表明,有必要制定量身定制的人工智能实施策略,考虑患者的人口统计、健康状况以及对可解释的人工智能和医生监督的偏好。所有研究数据均已公开,以鼓励复制和进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multinational attitudes towards AI in healthcare and diagnostics among hospital patients
The successful implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is dependent upon the acceptance of this technology by key stakeholders, particularly patients, who are the primary beneficiaries of AI-driven outcomes. This international, multicenter, cross-sectional study assessed the attitudes of hospital patients towards AI in healthcare across 43 countries. A total of 13806 patients at 74 hospitals were surveyed between February and November 2023, with 64.8% from the Global North and 35.2% from the Global South. The findings indicate a predominantly favorable general view of AI in healthcare, with 57.6% of respondents expressing a positive attitude. However, attitudes exhibited notable variation based on demographic characteristics, health status, and technological literacy. Female respondents and those with poorer health status exhibited fewer positive attitudes towards AI use in medicine. Conversely, higher levels of AI knowledge and frequent use of technology devices were associated with more positive attitudes. It is noteworthy that less than half of the participants expressed positive attitudes regarding all items pertaining to trust in AI. The lowest level of trust was observed for the accuracy of AI in providing information regarding treatment responses. Patients exhibited a strong preference for explainable AI and physician-led decision-making, even if it meant slightly compromised accuracy. This large-scale, multinational study provides a comprehensive perspective on patient attitudes towards AI in healthcare across six continents. Findings suggest a need for tailored AI implementation strategies that consider patient demographics, health status, and preferences for explainable AI and physician oversight. All study data has been made publicly available to encourage replication and further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case is not a case is not a case - challenges and solutions in determining urolithiasis caseloads using the digital infrastructure of a clinical data warehouse Reliable Online Auditory Cognitive Testing: An observational study Federated Multiple Imputation for Variables that Are Missing Not At Random in Distributed Electronic Health Records Characterizing the connection between Parkinson's disease progression and healthcare utilization Generative AI and Large Language Models in Reducing Medication Related Harm and Adverse Drug Events - A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1