在印度各级医疗机构加强以设施为基础的综合急诊服务,以应对时间敏感的紧急情况:实施调查研究协议

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x
Tej Prakash Sinha, Sanjeev Bhoi, Dolly Sharma, Sushmita Chauhan, Radhika Magan, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Stuti Bhargava, Patanjali Dev Nayar, Venkatnarayan Kannan, Rakesh Lodha, Garima Kacchawa, Narendra Kumar Arora, Moji Jini, Pramod Kumar Sinha, Satyajeet Verma, Pawan Goyal, K. V. Viswanathan, Kemba Padu, Pallavi Boro, Yogesh Kumar, Pratibha Gupta, Srikanth Damodaran, Nasar Jubair
{"title":"在印度各级医疗机构加强以设施为基础的综合急诊服务,以应对时间敏感的紧急情况:实施调查研究协议","authors":"Tej Prakash Sinha, Sanjeev Bhoi, Dolly Sharma, Sushmita Chauhan, Radhika Magan, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Stuti Bhargava, Patanjali Dev Nayar, Venkatnarayan Kannan, Rakesh Lodha, Garima Kacchawa, Narendra Kumar Arora, Moji Jini, Pramod Kumar Sinha, Satyajeet Verma, Pawan Goyal, K. V. Viswanathan, Kemba Padu, Pallavi Boro, Yogesh Kumar, Pratibha Gupta, Srikanth Damodaran, Nasar Jubair","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The healthcare system in India is tiered and has primary, secondary and tertiary levels of facilities depending on the complexity and severity of health challenges at these facilities. Evidence suggests that emergency services in the country is fragmented. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators of emergency care delivery for patients with time-sensitive conditions, and develop and implement a contextually relevant model, and measure its impact using implementation research outcomes. We will study 85 healthcare facilities across five zones of the country and focus on emergency care delivery for 11 time-sensitive conditions. This implementation research will include seven phases: the preparatory phase, formative assessment, co-design of Model “Zero”, co-implementation, model optimization, end-line evaluation and consolidation phase. The “preparatory phase” will involve stakeholder meetings, approval from health authorities and the establishment of a research ecosystem. The “formative assessment” will include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the existing healthcare facilities and personnel to identify gaps, barriers and facilitators of emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions. On the basis of the results of the formative assessment, context-specific implementation strategies will be developed through meetings with stakeholders, providers and experts. The “co-design of Model ‘Zero’” phase will help develop the initial Model “Zero”, which will be pilot tested on a small scale (co-implementation). In the “model optimization” phase, iterative feedback loops of meetings and testing various strategies will help develop and implement the final context-specific model. End-line evaluation will assess implementation research outcomes such as acceptability, adoption, fidelity and penetration. The consolidation phase will include planning for the sustenance of the interventions. In a country such as India, where resources are scarce, this study will identify the barriers and facilitators to delivering emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions across five varied zones of the country. Stakeholder and provider participation in developing consensus-based implementation strategies, along with iterative cycles of meetings and testing, will help adapt these strategies to local needs. This approach will ensure that the developed models are practical, feasible and tailored to the specific challenges and requirements of each region.","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening facility-based integrated emergency care services for time sensitive emergencies at all levels of healthcare in India: An implementation research study protocol\",\"authors\":\"Tej Prakash Sinha, Sanjeev Bhoi, Dolly Sharma, Sushmita Chauhan, Radhika Magan, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Stuti Bhargava, Patanjali Dev Nayar, Venkatnarayan Kannan, Rakesh Lodha, Garima Kacchawa, Narendra Kumar Arora, Moji Jini, Pramod Kumar Sinha, Satyajeet Verma, Pawan Goyal, K. V. Viswanathan, Kemba Padu, Pallavi Boro, Yogesh Kumar, Pratibha Gupta, Srikanth Damodaran, Nasar Jubair\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The healthcare system in India is tiered and has primary, secondary and tertiary levels of facilities depending on the complexity and severity of health challenges at these facilities. Evidence suggests that emergency services in the country is fragmented. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators of emergency care delivery for patients with time-sensitive conditions, and develop and implement a contextually relevant model, and measure its impact using implementation research outcomes. We will study 85 healthcare facilities across five zones of the country and focus on emergency care delivery for 11 time-sensitive conditions. This implementation research will include seven phases: the preparatory phase, formative assessment, co-design of Model “Zero”, co-implementation, model optimization, end-line evaluation and consolidation phase. The “preparatory phase” will involve stakeholder meetings, approval from health authorities and the establishment of a research ecosystem. The “formative assessment” will include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the existing healthcare facilities and personnel to identify gaps, barriers and facilitators of emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions. On the basis of the results of the formative assessment, context-specific implementation strategies will be developed through meetings with stakeholders, providers and experts. The “co-design of Model ‘Zero’” phase will help develop the initial Model “Zero”, which will be pilot tested on a small scale (co-implementation). In the “model optimization” phase, iterative feedback loops of meetings and testing various strategies will help develop and implement the final context-specific model. End-line evaluation will assess implementation research outcomes such as acceptability, adoption, fidelity and penetration. The consolidation phase will include planning for the sustenance of the interventions. In a country such as India, where resources are scarce, this study will identify the barriers and facilitators to delivering emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions across five varied zones of the country. Stakeholder and provider participation in developing consensus-based implementation strategies, along with iterative cycles of meetings and testing, will help adapt these strategies to local needs. This approach will ensure that the developed models are practical, feasible and tailored to the specific challenges and requirements of each region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度的医疗保健系统是分级的,有初级、二级和三级设施,取决于这些设施所面临的健康挑战的复杂性和严重性。有证据表明,印度的急诊服务非常分散。本研究旨在确定为具有时间敏感性的患者提供急诊服务的障碍和促进因素,开发并实施一个与具体情况相关的模式,并利用实施研究成果来衡量其影响。我们将对全国五个地区的 85 家医疗机构进行研究,重点关注 11 种时间敏感性疾病的急诊护理服务。这项实施研究将包括七个阶段:准备阶段、形成性评估、共同设计 "零 "模式、共同实施、模式优化、终端评估和巩固阶段。在 "准备阶段",将召开利益相关者会议,获得卫生部门的批准,并建立研究生态系统。形成性评估 "将包括对现有医疗设施和人员进行定量和定性评估,以确定时间敏感性条件下紧急护理服务的差距、障碍和促进因素。在形成性评估结果的基础上,将通过与利益攸关方、医疗服务提供者和专家举行会议,制定针对具体情况的实施战略。共同设计'零'模式 "阶段将有助于开发最初的 "零 "模式,并在小范围内进行试点测试(共同实施)。在 "模式优化 "阶段,会议和测试各种策略的迭代反馈循环将有助于开发和实施最终的针对具体情况的模式。终端评估将评估实施研究成果,如可接受性、采用率、忠实度和渗透率。巩固阶段将包括规划干预措施的持续性。在印度这样一个资源匮乏的国家,这项研究将确定在该国五个不同地区为时间敏感性疾病提供紧急护理服务的障碍和促进因素。利益相关者和医疗服务提供者参与制定以共识为基础的实施策略,并通过反复循环的会议和测试,将有助于使这些策略适应当地需求。这种方法将确保所开发的模式切实可行,并适合每个地区的具体挑战和要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengthening facility-based integrated emergency care services for time sensitive emergencies at all levels of healthcare in India: An implementation research study protocol
The healthcare system in India is tiered and has primary, secondary and tertiary levels of facilities depending on the complexity and severity of health challenges at these facilities. Evidence suggests that emergency services in the country is fragmented. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators of emergency care delivery for patients with time-sensitive conditions, and develop and implement a contextually relevant model, and measure its impact using implementation research outcomes. We will study 85 healthcare facilities across five zones of the country and focus on emergency care delivery for 11 time-sensitive conditions. This implementation research will include seven phases: the preparatory phase, formative assessment, co-design of Model “Zero”, co-implementation, model optimization, end-line evaluation and consolidation phase. The “preparatory phase” will involve stakeholder meetings, approval from health authorities and the establishment of a research ecosystem. The “formative assessment” will include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the existing healthcare facilities and personnel to identify gaps, barriers and facilitators of emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions. On the basis of the results of the formative assessment, context-specific implementation strategies will be developed through meetings with stakeholders, providers and experts. The “co-design of Model ‘Zero’” phase will help develop the initial Model “Zero”, which will be pilot tested on a small scale (co-implementation). In the “model optimization” phase, iterative feedback loops of meetings and testing various strategies will help develop and implement the final context-specific model. End-line evaluation will assess implementation research outcomes such as acceptability, adoption, fidelity and penetration. The consolidation phase will include planning for the sustenance of the interventions. In a country such as India, where resources are scarce, this study will identify the barriers and facilitators to delivering emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions across five varied zones of the country. Stakeholder and provider participation in developing consensus-based implementation strategies, along with iterative cycles of meetings and testing, will help adapt these strategies to local needs. This approach will ensure that the developed models are practical, feasible and tailored to the specific challenges and requirements of each region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
The embedded research model: an answer to the research and evaluation needs of community service organizations? Implementation of national policies and interventions (WHO Best Buys) for non-communicable disease prevention and control in Ghana: a mixed methods analysis. Policy impact of the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team: global perspective and United Kingdom case study. Real-world data to improve organ and tissue donation policies: lessons learned from the tissue and organ donor epidemiology study. "All of these things interact, that's why it's such a wicked problem": Stakeholders' perspectives of what hinders low back pain care in Australia and how to improve it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1