第三次科威特厌氧菌抗生素敏感性多中心调查:20 年数据对比分析》。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Microbial drug resistance Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1089/mdr.2024.0036
Khalifa Al Benwan,Wafaa Jamal,May Shahin
{"title":"第三次科威特厌氧菌抗生素敏感性多中心调查:20 年数据对比分析》。","authors":"Khalifa Al Benwan,Wafaa Jamal,May Shahin","doi":"10.1089/mdr.2024.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility and antimicrobial resistance trends among clinically significant anaerobes in Kuwait hospitals from 2013 to 2022, comparing these findings with data from 2002 to 2012. Methods: The study prospectively collected 2,317 anaerobic isolates from various body sites across four Kuwaiti hospitals between January 2013 and December 2022. The minimum inhibitory concentrations for 11 antianaerobic antibiotics were determined using E-test methodology. The study analyzed trends and resistance rates across two periods: 2013-2017 and 2018-2022, using statistical analysis for resistance comparison. Results: Of the 2,317 isolates, most were from wounds (42.2%), fluids (28.0%), and tissues (20.5%). Bacteroides fragilis was the most common pathogen (34.0%), followed by Prevotella bivia (13.4%). Over 90% of isolates were susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline, and metronidazole, whereas lower susceptibility was observed for penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and clindamycin. Notable differences in resistance profiles since 2002 were observed, especially in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and clindamycin. Conclusion: Owing to detected resistance to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing for anaerobic isolates is recommended in severe infections to ensure effective antimicrobial therapy. Continuous surveillance is crucial for developing antibiotic policies to manage invasive anaerobic infections.","PeriodicalId":18701,"journal":{"name":"Microbial drug resistance","volume":"64 1","pages":"372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third Kuwaiti Multicenter Survey of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria: A Comparative Analysis of 20-Year Data.\",\"authors\":\"Khalifa Al Benwan,Wafaa Jamal,May Shahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/mdr.2024.0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility and antimicrobial resistance trends among clinically significant anaerobes in Kuwait hospitals from 2013 to 2022, comparing these findings with data from 2002 to 2012. Methods: The study prospectively collected 2,317 anaerobic isolates from various body sites across four Kuwaiti hospitals between January 2013 and December 2022. The minimum inhibitory concentrations for 11 antianaerobic antibiotics were determined using E-test methodology. The study analyzed trends and resistance rates across two periods: 2013-2017 and 2018-2022, using statistical analysis for resistance comparison. Results: Of the 2,317 isolates, most were from wounds (42.2%), fluids (28.0%), and tissues (20.5%). Bacteroides fragilis was the most common pathogen (34.0%), followed by Prevotella bivia (13.4%). Over 90% of isolates were susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline, and metronidazole, whereas lower susceptibility was observed for penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and clindamycin. Notable differences in resistance profiles since 2002 were observed, especially in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and clindamycin. Conclusion: Owing to detected resistance to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing for anaerobic isolates is recommended in severe infections to ensure effective antimicrobial therapy. Continuous surveillance is crucial for developing antibiotic policies to manage invasive anaerobic infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial drug resistance\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"372-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial drug resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2024.0036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial drug resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2024.0036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估 2013 年至 2022 年科威特医院中具有临床意义的厌氧菌对抗生素的敏感性和耐药性趋势,并将这些结果与 2002 年至 2012 年的数据进行比较。研究方法该研究在 2013 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间从科威特四家医院的不同身体部位前瞻性地收集了 2317 份厌氧菌分离物。采用 E 测试方法测定了 11 种抗厌氧菌抗生素的最低抑菌浓度。研究分析了 2013-2017 年和 2018-2022 年两个时期的趋势和耐药率,并使用统计分析进行耐药性比较。研究结果在 2317 个分离株中,大多数来自伤口(42.2%)、体液(28.0%)和组织(20.5%)。脆弱拟杆菌是最常见的病原体(34.0%),其次是弧菌(13.4%)。超过 90% 的分离菌株对亚胺培南、美罗培南、替加环素和甲硝唑敏感,而对青霉素、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和林可霉素的敏感性较低。自 2002 年以来,耐药性情况出现了显著差异,尤其是阿莫西林-克拉维酸、哌拉西林、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和克林霉素。结论由于发现了对所有抗生素的耐药性,建议对严重感染的厌氧菌分离物进行药敏试验,以确保有效的抗菌治疗。持续监测对于制定管理侵袭性厌氧菌感染的抗生素政策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Third Kuwaiti Multicenter Survey of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria: A Comparative Analysis of 20-Year Data.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility and antimicrobial resistance trends among clinically significant anaerobes in Kuwait hospitals from 2013 to 2022, comparing these findings with data from 2002 to 2012. Methods: The study prospectively collected 2,317 anaerobic isolates from various body sites across four Kuwaiti hospitals between January 2013 and December 2022. The minimum inhibitory concentrations for 11 antianaerobic antibiotics were determined using E-test methodology. The study analyzed trends and resistance rates across two periods: 2013-2017 and 2018-2022, using statistical analysis for resistance comparison. Results: Of the 2,317 isolates, most were from wounds (42.2%), fluids (28.0%), and tissues (20.5%). Bacteroides fragilis was the most common pathogen (34.0%), followed by Prevotella bivia (13.4%). Over 90% of isolates were susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline, and metronidazole, whereas lower susceptibility was observed for penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and clindamycin. Notable differences in resistance profiles since 2002 were observed, especially in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and clindamycin. Conclusion: Owing to detected resistance to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing for anaerobic isolates is recommended in severe infections to ensure effective antimicrobial therapy. Continuous surveillance is crucial for developing antibiotic policies to manage invasive anaerobic infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial drug resistance
Microbial drug resistance 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbial Drug Resistance (MDR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers the global spread and threat of multi-drug resistant clones of major pathogens that are widely documented in hospitals and the scientific community. The Journal addresses the serious challenges of trying to decipher the molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. MDR provides a multidisciplinary forum for peer-reviewed original publications as well as topical reviews and special reports. MDR coverage includes: Molecular biology of resistance mechanisms Virulence genes and disease Molecular epidemiology Drug design Infection control.
期刊最新文献
In-Vitro Activity of Dimercaptosuccinic Acid in Combination with Carbapenems Against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A Selective Culture Medium for Screening Aztreonam-Avibactam Resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Deciphering the Resistome and Mobiolme of an Avian-Associated Enterococus faecalis ST249 Clone that Acquired Vancomycin Resistance Isolated from Neutropenic Patient in Tunisia. Spreading Ability of Tet(X)-Harboring Plasmid and Effect of Tetracyclines as a Selective Pressure. Emergence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Heidelberg Producing OXA 48 Carbapenemase in Eastern Algeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1