严重血友病和抑制剂儿科患者端口导管手术的围手术期管理

Anna Woestemeier, Silvia Horneff, Vincent Marlon Lüder, Jennifer Nadal, Arne Koscielny, Jörg C. Kalff, Johannes Oldenburg, Georg Goldmann, Philipp Lingohr
{"title":"严重血友病和抑制剂儿科患者端口导管手术的围手术期管理","authors":"Anna Woestemeier, Silvia Horneff, Vincent Marlon Lüder, Jennifer Nadal, Arne Koscielny, Jörg C. Kalff, Johannes Oldenburg, Georg Goldmann, Philipp Lingohr","doi":"10.1055/a-2337-3687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n<b>Background</b> The objective of this systematic study was to assess the perioperative management and outcome of surgery in pediatric patients with hemophilia A/B and inhibitors compared to nonhemophilic pediatric patients.</p> <p>\n<b>Methods</b> The surgical outcome of 69 port catheter operations in patients with hemophilia who developed inhibitory antibodies against the administered factor was compared to 51 procedures in the control group. In the patients with hemophilia and inhibitors, a standardized protocol for recombinant activated factor VII was used to prevent perioperative bleeding.</p> <p>\n<b>Results</b> Hemophilic pediatric patients with inhibitors showed no significant differences in perioperative management (blood transfusion: <i>p</i> = 0.067, duration of surgery: <i>p</i> = 0.69; <i>p</i> = 0.824) in comparison to patients without hemophilia<i>.</i> The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in pediatric patients with hemophilia and inhibitors (20 days vs. 4 days for insertion; 12 days vs. 1 day for explantation). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was found for secondary bleeding (three patients with hemophilia vs. none in the control group; <i>p</i> = 0.11) or surgical complications (five hemophilia patients vs. none with grade I complication; one hemophilia patient vs. none with grade II complications; <i>p</i> = 0.067).</p> <p>\n<b>Conclusion</b> This study has demonstrated that port catheter insertion and removal is safe in these patients. Moreover, it shows the importance of a coordinated approach with a multidisciplinary team.</p> ","PeriodicalId":501645,"journal":{"name":"Hämostaseologie","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Management for Port Catheter Procedures in Pediatric Patients with Severe Hemophilia and Inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Anna Woestemeier, Silvia Horneff, Vincent Marlon Lüder, Jennifer Nadal, Arne Koscielny, Jörg C. Kalff, Johannes Oldenburg, Georg Goldmann, Philipp Lingohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2337-3687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>\\n<b>Background</b> The objective of this systematic study was to assess the perioperative management and outcome of surgery in pediatric patients with hemophilia A/B and inhibitors compared to nonhemophilic pediatric patients.</p> <p>\\n<b>Methods</b> The surgical outcome of 69 port catheter operations in patients with hemophilia who developed inhibitory antibodies against the administered factor was compared to 51 procedures in the control group. In the patients with hemophilia and inhibitors, a standardized protocol for recombinant activated factor VII was used to prevent perioperative bleeding.</p> <p>\\n<b>Results</b> Hemophilic pediatric patients with inhibitors showed no significant differences in perioperative management (blood transfusion: <i>p</i> = 0.067, duration of surgery: <i>p</i> = 0.69; <i>p</i> = 0.824) in comparison to patients without hemophilia<i>.</i> The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in pediatric patients with hemophilia and inhibitors (20 days vs. 4 days for insertion; 12 days vs. 1 day for explantation). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was found for secondary bleeding (three patients with hemophilia vs. none in the control group; <i>p</i> = 0.11) or surgical complications (five hemophilia patients vs. none with grade I complication; one hemophilia patient vs. none with grade II complications; <i>p</i> = 0.067).</p> <p>\\n<b>Conclusion</b> This study has demonstrated that port catheter insertion and removal is safe in these patients. Moreover, it shows the importance of a coordinated approach with a multidisciplinary team.</p> \",\"PeriodicalId\":501645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hämostaseologie\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hämostaseologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2337-3687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hämostaseologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2337-3687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 这项系统性研究的目的是评估与非血友病儿科患者相比,A/B 型血友病和抑制剂儿科患者的围手术期管理和手术结果。方法 对血友病患者的 69 例端口导管手术与对照组的 51 例手术的手术结果进行比较。在血友病患者和抑制剂患者中,采用了重组活化因子 VII 的标准化方案,以防止围手术期出血。结果 患有抑制剂的血友病儿科患者与非血友病患者相比,在围手术期管理方面没有明显差异(输血:P = 0.067;手术时间:P = 0.69;P = 0.824)。患有血友病和抑制剂的儿科患者住院时间明显更长(插入手术 20 天对 4 天;剥离手术 12 天对 1 天)。此外,在继发性出血(3 名血友病患者与对照组无;P = 0.11)或手术并发症(5 名血友病患者与无一级并发症患者;1 名血友病患者与无二级并发症患者;P = 0.067)方面也没有发现明显的统计学差异。结论 本研究表明,在这些患者中插入和拔出端口导管是安全的。此外,该研究还显示了多学科团队协调合作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative Management for Port Catheter Procedures in Pediatric Patients with Severe Hemophilia and Inhibitors

Background The objective of this systematic study was to assess the perioperative management and outcome of surgery in pediatric patients with hemophilia A/B and inhibitors compared to nonhemophilic pediatric patients.

Methods The surgical outcome of 69 port catheter operations in patients with hemophilia who developed inhibitory antibodies against the administered factor was compared to 51 procedures in the control group. In the patients with hemophilia and inhibitors, a standardized protocol for recombinant activated factor VII was used to prevent perioperative bleeding.

Results Hemophilic pediatric patients with inhibitors showed no significant differences in perioperative management (blood transfusion: p = 0.067, duration of surgery: p = 0.69; p = 0.824) in comparison to patients without hemophilia. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in pediatric patients with hemophilia and inhibitors (20 days vs. 4 days for insertion; 12 days vs. 1 day for explantation). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was found for secondary bleeding (three patients with hemophilia vs. none in the control group; p = 0.11) or surgical complications (five hemophilia patients vs. none with grade I complication; one hemophilia patient vs. none with grade II complications; p = 0.067).

Conclusion This study has demonstrated that port catheter insertion and removal is safe in these patients. Moreover, it shows the importance of a coordinated approach with a multidisciplinary team.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Management for Port Catheter Procedures in Pediatric Patients with Severe Hemophilia and Inhibitors Reform des Kapitels 32 (Laboratoriumsmedizin) im einheitlichen Bewertungsmaßstab (EBM) Pulmonary Embolism: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF-S2k Guideline Efgartigimod hilft bei Immunthrombozytopenie Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients on Anticoagulation: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF S2k Guideline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1