移动医疗用户在面对隐私披露行为时会经历怎样的决策过程?双重权衡视角

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Aslib Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0051
Hao Xin, FengTao Liu, ZiXiang Wei
{"title":"移动医疗用户在面对隐私披露行为时会经历怎样的决策过程?双重权衡视角","authors":"Hao Xin, FengTao Liu, ZiXiang Wei","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper proposes that the trade-off between medical benefits and privacy concerns among mHealth users extends to their disclosure intentions, manifested as individuals simultaneously holding intentions to tend to disclose in the near future and to reduce disclosure in the distant future. Consequently, this paper aims to explore the privacy decision-making process of mHealth users from the perspective of a dual trade-off.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper constructs the model using the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent-privacy concern-outcome framework. It employs the construal level theory to evaluate the impact of privacy calculus on two types of disclosure intentions. The study empirically tests the model using a data sample of 386 mHealth users.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results indicate that perceived benefits positively affect both near-future and distant-future disclosure intentions. In contrast, perceived risks just negatively affect distant-future disclosure intention. Additionally, perceived benefits, near-future and distant-future disclosure intentions positively affect disclosure behavior. The findings also reveal that privacy management perception positively affects perceived benefits. Personalized services and privacy invasion experience positively affect perceived benefits and risks, while trust negatively affects perceived risks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper considers the trade-off in the privacy calculus phase as the first trade-off. On this basis, this trade-off will extend to the disclosure intention. The individuals’ two times of trade-offs between privacy concerns and medical benefits constitute the dual trade-off perspective. This paper first uses this perspective to explore the privacy decision-making process of mHealth users. This paper employs the construal level theory to effectively evaluate the impact of privacy calculus on both disclosure intentions in mHealth, extending the theory’s applicability. Moreover, we introduce antecedents of privacy calculus from the perspectives of platform, society, and individuals, enhancing the study’s realism. The research findings provide a basis for mHealth platforms to better cater to users’ privacy needs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":53152,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hao Xin, FengTao Liu, ZiXiang Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper proposes that the trade-off between medical benefits and privacy concerns among mHealth users extends to their disclosure intentions, manifested as individuals simultaneously holding intentions to tend to disclose in the near future and to reduce disclosure in the distant future. Consequently, this paper aims to explore the privacy decision-making process of mHealth users from the perspective of a dual trade-off.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This paper constructs the model using the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent-privacy concern-outcome framework. It employs the construal level theory to evaluate the impact of privacy calculus on two types of disclosure intentions. The study empirically tests the model using a data sample of 386 mHealth users.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results indicate that perceived benefits positively affect both near-future and distant-future disclosure intentions. In contrast, perceived risks just negatively affect distant-future disclosure intention. Additionally, perceived benefits, near-future and distant-future disclosure intentions positively affect disclosure behavior. The findings also reveal that privacy management perception positively affects perceived benefits. Personalized services and privacy invasion experience positively affect perceived benefits and risks, while trust negatively affects perceived risks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper considers the trade-off in the privacy calculus phase as the first trade-off. On this basis, this trade-off will extend to the disclosure intention. The individuals’ two times of trade-offs between privacy concerns and medical benefits constitute the dual trade-off perspective. This paper first uses this perspective to explore the privacy decision-making process of mHealth users. This paper employs the construal level theory to effectively evaluate the impact of privacy calculus on both disclosure intentions in mHealth, extending the theory’s applicability. Moreover, we introduce antecedents of privacy calculus from the perspectives of platform, society, and individuals, enhancing the study’s realism. The research findings provide a basis for mHealth platforms to better cater to users’ privacy needs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":53152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文提出移动医疗用户在医疗利益和隐私顾虑之间的权衡会延伸到他们的披露意图,表现为个人同时持有近期倾向于披露和远期减少披露的意图。因此,本文旨在从双重权衡的角度探讨移动医疗用户的隐私决策过程。本文采用隐私微积分理论和前因-隐私关注-结果框架构建模型。本文采用构解水平理论来评估隐私计算对两类信息披露意向的影响。研究使用 386 位移动医疗用户的数据样本对模型进行了实证检验。研究结果表明,感知到的好处会对近期和远期的披露意愿产生积极影响。相比之下,感知风险只会对远期披露意愿产生负面影响。此外,感知到的益处、近期和远期披露意愿都会对披露行为产生积极影响。研究结果还显示,隐私管理感知会对感知利益产生积极影响。个性化服务和隐私侵犯体验会对感知到的利益和风险产生积极影响,而信任则会对感知到的风险产生消极影响。在此基础上,这种权衡将延伸到披露意向。个人在隐私关注和医疗利益之间的两次权衡构成了双重权衡视角。本文首先利用这一视角来探讨移动医疗用户的隐私决策过程。本文运用构解水平理论有效评估了移动医疗中隐私计算对两种披露意向的影响,拓展了该理论的适用性。此外,我们还从平台、社会和个人的角度介绍了隐私计算的前因,增强了研究的现实性。研究结果为移动医疗平台更好地满足用户的隐私需求提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective

Purpose

This paper proposes that the trade-off between medical benefits and privacy concerns among mHealth users extends to their disclosure intentions, manifested as individuals simultaneously holding intentions to tend to disclose in the near future and to reduce disclosure in the distant future. Consequently, this paper aims to explore the privacy decision-making process of mHealth users from the perspective of a dual trade-off.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper constructs the model using the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent-privacy concern-outcome framework. It employs the construal level theory to evaluate the impact of privacy calculus on two types of disclosure intentions. The study empirically tests the model using a data sample of 386 mHealth users.

Findings

The results indicate that perceived benefits positively affect both near-future and distant-future disclosure intentions. In contrast, perceived risks just negatively affect distant-future disclosure intention. Additionally, perceived benefits, near-future and distant-future disclosure intentions positively affect disclosure behavior. The findings also reveal that privacy management perception positively affects perceived benefits. Personalized services and privacy invasion experience positively affect perceived benefits and risks, while trust negatively affects perceived risks.

Originality/value

This paper considers the trade-off in the privacy calculus phase as the first trade-off. On this basis, this trade-off will extend to the disclosure intention. The individuals’ two times of trade-offs between privacy concerns and medical benefits constitute the dual trade-off perspective. This paper first uses this perspective to explore the privacy decision-making process of mHealth users. This paper employs the construal level theory to effectively evaluate the impact of privacy calculus on both disclosure intentions in mHealth, extending the theory’s applicability. Moreover, we introduce antecedents of privacy calculus from the perspectives of platform, society, and individuals, enhancing the study’s realism. The research findings provide a basis for mHealth platforms to better cater to users’ privacy needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Aslib Journal of Information Management COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Aslib Journal of Information Management covers a broad range of issues in the field, including economic, behavioural, social, ethical, technological, international, business-related, political and management-orientated factors. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work. Aslib Journal of Information Management Areas of interest include topics such as social media, data protection, search engines, information retrieval, digital libraries, information behaviour, intellectual property and copyright, information industry, digital repositories and information policy and governance.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of team engagement on patient satisfaction: insights from social support and transactive memory system Factors affecting user intention to use social commerce continuously from a habit perspective What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective Collaborative online shopping: customer satisfaction and the influence of product type, gender and involvement An associative text analyzer to facilitate effectiveness of exploring historical texts for digital humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1