地面反作用力的发展速度与冲刺加速时的跑步速度有关

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/17479541241276476
Ryu Nagahara, Olivier Girard, Paul-Axel Messou
{"title":"地面反作用力的发展速度与冲刺加速时的跑步速度有关","authors":"Ryu Nagahara, Olivier Girard, Paul-Axel Messou","doi":"10.1177/17479541241276476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the relationship between overground sprint performance and rates of force development (RFDs) in ground reaction forces (GRF) during the entire acceleration phase. Thirty-one male sprinters performed 60-m sprints during which the GRF from the start to the 50-m mark were measured. The vertical, braking and propulsive RFDs at each step were calculated as the average rate of change in GRF. Average values for each four steps during the acceleration phase were calculated to examine relationships between running speed or average horizontal external power (AHEP) and RFD values. The RFD values ranged from 859.8 ± 191.1 to 1682.0 ± 258.2 N/s/kg for vertical force, −502.6 ± 215.7 to −1033.8 ± 196.2 N/s/kg for braking force, and 97.2 ± 11.7 to 185.4 ± 32.3 N/s/kg for propulsive force. There were associations of running speed with vertical RFD at the 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step section (r = 0.385) and with propulsive RFD at the 1<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–4<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step section and from the 13<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>–16<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step sections (r = 0.386–0.559). Moreover, AHEP was correlated with vertical RFD from the 13<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>–16<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step sections (r = 0.442–0.523), with braking RFD at the 17<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>–20<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> and 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step sections (r = −0.423 and −0.448), and with propulsive RFD at every step section (r = 0.374–0.856). In conclusion, greater propulsive RFD throughout the acceleration phase, along with higher braking and vertical RFD during the later acceleration section, may indicate better sprint performance.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rates of ground reaction force development are associated with running speed during sprint acceleration\",\"authors\":\"Ryu Nagahara, Olivier Girard, Paul-Axel Messou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17479541241276476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to investigate the relationship between overground sprint performance and rates of force development (RFDs) in ground reaction forces (GRF) during the entire acceleration phase. Thirty-one male sprinters performed 60-m sprints during which the GRF from the start to the 50-m mark were measured. The vertical, braking and propulsive RFDs at each step were calculated as the average rate of change in GRF. Average values for each four steps during the acceleration phase were calculated to examine relationships between running speed or average horizontal external power (AHEP) and RFD values. The RFD values ranged from 859.8 ± 191.1 to 1682.0 ± 258.2 N/s/kg for vertical force, −502.6 ± 215.7 to −1033.8 ± 196.2 N/s/kg for braking force, and 97.2 ± 11.7 to 185.4 ± 32.3 N/s/kg for propulsive force. There were associations of running speed with vertical RFD at the 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step section (r = 0.385) and with propulsive RFD at the 1<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–4<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step section and from the 13<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>–16<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step sections (r = 0.386–0.559). Moreover, AHEP was correlated with vertical RFD from the 13<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>–16<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> to 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step sections (r = 0.442–0.523), with braking RFD at the 17<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>–20<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> and 21<jats:sup>st</jats:sup>–24<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> step sections (r = −0.423 and −0.448), and with propulsive RFD at every step section (r = 0.374–0.856). In conclusion, greater propulsive RFD throughout the acceleration phase, along with higher braking and vertical RFD during the later acceleration section, may indicate better sprint performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241276476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241276476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨地面短跑成绩与整个加速阶段地面反作用力(GRF)的力量发展速率(RFD)之间的关系。31 名男子短跑运动员进行了 60 米短跑,期间测量了从起跑到 50 米处的地面反作用力。每一步的垂直、制动和推进 RFD 均按 GRF 的平均变化率计算。计算加速阶段每四个台阶的平均值,以研究跑步速度或平均水平外部功率(AHEP)与 RFD 值之间的关系。垂直力的 RFD 值从 859.8 ± 191.1 到 1682.0 ± 258.2 N/s/kg,制动力的 RFD 值从 -502.6 ± 215.7 到 -1033.8 ± 196.2 N/s/kg,推进力的 RFD 值从 97.2 ± 11.7 到 185.4 ± 32.3 N/s/kg。在第21-24步段,跑步速度与垂直RFD相关(r = 0.385),在第1-4步段和第13-16至21-24步段,跑步速度与推进RFD相关(r = 0.386-0.559)。此外,AHEP 与第 13-16 步至第 21-24 步步段的垂直 RFD 相关(r = 0.442-0.523),与第 17-20 步和第 21-24 步步段的制动 RFD 相关(r = -0.423 和 -0.448),与每个步段的推进 RFD 相关(r = 0.374-0.856)。总之,在整个加速阶段有更大的推进RFD,以及在后面的加速段有更高的制动和垂直RFD,可能预示着更好的冲刺表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rates of ground reaction force development are associated with running speed during sprint acceleration
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between overground sprint performance and rates of force development (RFDs) in ground reaction forces (GRF) during the entire acceleration phase. Thirty-one male sprinters performed 60-m sprints during which the GRF from the start to the 50-m mark were measured. The vertical, braking and propulsive RFDs at each step were calculated as the average rate of change in GRF. Average values for each four steps during the acceleration phase were calculated to examine relationships between running speed or average horizontal external power (AHEP) and RFD values. The RFD values ranged from 859.8 ± 191.1 to 1682.0 ± 258.2 N/s/kg for vertical force, −502.6 ± 215.7 to −1033.8 ± 196.2 N/s/kg for braking force, and 97.2 ± 11.7 to 185.4 ± 32.3 N/s/kg for propulsive force. There were associations of running speed with vertical RFD at the 21st–24th step section (r = 0.385) and with propulsive RFD at the 1st–4th step section and from the 13th–16th to 21st–24th step sections (r = 0.386–0.559). Moreover, AHEP was correlated with vertical RFD from the 13th–16th to 21st–24th step sections (r = 0.442–0.523), with braking RFD at the 17th–20th and 21st–24th step sections (r = −0.423 and −0.448), and with propulsive RFD at every step section (r = 0.374–0.856). In conclusion, greater propulsive RFD throughout the acceleration phase, along with higher braking and vertical RFD during the later acceleration section, may indicate better sprint performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.
期刊最新文献
Impact of coach education on coaching effectiveness in youth sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis Insights into coaching effectiveness: Perspectives from coaches and players in South African Women's Rugby A principled approach to skill acquisition in competitive surfing: Embracing representative learning design Effects of coaches' authentic leadership on athletes' training competition satisfaction: The mediating roles of psychological ownership and athlete engagement Training volume, intensity, and performance of world-class Chinese rowers prior to the 2019 world championships: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1