代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝和自身免疫性肝炎患者的候选名单和移植结果

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Liver International Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1111/liv.16100
Esli Medina-Morales, Mohamed Ismail, Ritik M. Goyal, Ana Marenco-Flores, Behnam Saberi, Zachary Fricker, Alan Bonder, Hirsh D. Trivedi
{"title":"代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝和自身免疫性肝炎患者的候选名单和移植结果","authors":"Esli Medina-Morales,&nbsp;Mohamed Ismail,&nbsp;Ritik M. Goyal,&nbsp;Ana Marenco-Flores,&nbsp;Behnam Saberi,&nbsp;Zachary Fricker,&nbsp;Alan Bonder,&nbsp;Hirsh D. Trivedi","doi":"10.1111/liv.16100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (<i>n</i> = 282), AIH (<i>n</i> = 5812), and MASLD (<i>n</i> = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, <i>p</i> &lt; .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, <i>p</i> = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, <i>p</i> = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, <i>p</i> = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, <i>p</i> = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, <i>p</i> = .42).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"44 11","pages":"3083-3095"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis\",\"authors\":\"Esli Medina-Morales,&nbsp;Mohamed Ismail,&nbsp;Ritik M. Goyal,&nbsp;Ana Marenco-Flores,&nbsp;Behnam Saberi,&nbsp;Zachary Fricker,&nbsp;Alan Bonder,&nbsp;Hirsh D. Trivedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/liv.16100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (<i>n</i> = 282), AIH (<i>n</i> = 5812), and MASLD (<i>n</i> = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, <i>p</i> &lt; .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, <i>p</i> = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, <i>p</i> = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, <i>p</i> = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, <i>p</i> = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, <i>p</i> = .42).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver International\",\"volume\":\"44 11\",\"pages\":\"3083-3095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.16100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.16100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的在肝移植(LT)候选者或受者中,代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)与自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)并存的情况仍然鲜为人知。方法利用联合网络器官共享数据库(2002-2022 年),我们比较了 MASLD/AIH(n = 282)、AIH(n = 5812)和 MASLD(n = 33 331)患者的等待结果和 LT 后存活率。结果MASLD/AIH组脑病和腹水发生率最高,MELD评分最高。与单纯 MASLD 相比,MASLD/AIH 患者的移植发生率更高(调整后的亚分布危险比 [aSHR] 1.64,95% CI 1.44-1.85;p < .001),候选名单移除风险更低(aSHR .30,95% CI .20-.44;p < .001)。与 AIH(患者:92% 对 91%,p < .001;移植物:89% 对 88%,p < .001)和 MASLD/AIH (患者:92% 对 90%,p = .008;移植物:89% 对 88%,p = .023)相比,MASLD 的一年 LT 后存活率更高。与MASLD(患者:63% vs. 61%,p = .68;移植物:60% vs. 59%,p = .83)和AIH(患者:63% vs. 70%,p = .07;移植物:60% vs. 64%,p = .42)相比,MASLD/AIH受者在LT后10年的存活率没有明显差异。我们的研究表明,MASLD/AIH 患者的 LT 发生率较高,辍学率较低。需要进一步的前瞻性多中心研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis

Background and Aims

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.

Methods

Using the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (n = 282), AIH (n = 5812), and MASLD (n = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.

Results

MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; p < .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; p < .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, p < .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p < .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, p = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, p = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, p = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, p = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, p = .42).

Conclusions

Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver International
Liver International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
348
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Featured Cover Additional Cover MASLD, At-Risk MASH and Increased Liver Stiffness Are Associated With Young Adulthood Obesity Without Residual Risk After Losing Obesity. 166Ho-RadioEmbolizaTiOn Using personalized prediCtive dosimetry in patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, single-centre study (RETOUCH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1