Esli Medina-Morales, Mohamed Ismail, Ritik M. Goyal, Ana Marenco-Flores, Behnam Saberi, Zachary Fricker, Alan Bonder, Hirsh D. Trivedi
{"title":"代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝和自身免疫性肝炎患者的候选名单和移植结果","authors":"Esli Medina-Morales, Mohamed Ismail, Ritik M. Goyal, Ana Marenco-Flores, Behnam Saberi, Zachary Fricker, Alan Bonder, Hirsh D. Trivedi","doi":"10.1111/liv.16100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (<i>n</i> = 282), AIH (<i>n</i> = 5812), and MASLD (<i>n</i> = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; <i>p</i> < .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; <i>p</i> < .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, <i>p</i> < .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> < .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, <i>p</i> = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, <i>p</i> = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, <i>p</i> = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, <i>p</i> = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, <i>p</i> = .42).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"44 11","pages":"3083-3095"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis\",\"authors\":\"Esli Medina-Morales, Mohamed Ismail, Ritik M. Goyal, Ana Marenco-Flores, Behnam Saberi, Zachary Fricker, Alan Bonder, Hirsh D. Trivedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/liv.16100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (<i>n</i> = 282), AIH (<i>n</i> = 5812), and MASLD (<i>n</i> = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; <i>p</i> < .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; <i>p</i> < .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, <i>p</i> < .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> < .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, <i>p</i> = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, <i>p</i> = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, <i>p</i> = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, <i>p</i> = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, <i>p</i> = .42).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver International\",\"volume\":\"44 11\",\"pages\":\"3083-3095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.16100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.16100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis
Background and Aims
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone.
Methods
Using the united network organ sharing database (2002–2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (n = 282), AIH (n = 5812), and MASLD (n = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.
Results
MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44–1.85; p < .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20–.44; p < .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, p < .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p < .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, p = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, p = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, p = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, p = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, p = .42).
Conclusions
Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.
期刊介绍:
Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.