推向真相:使用不确定性加权修正法将原子守恒作为大气成分模型中的硬约束条件

Patrick Obin Sturm, Sam J. Silva
{"title":"推向真相:使用不确定性加权修正法将原子守恒作为大气成分模型中的硬约束条件","authors":"Patrick Obin Sturm, Sam J. Silva","doi":"arxiv-2408.16109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational models of atmospheric composition are not always physically\nconsistent. For example, not all models respect fundamental conservation laws\nsuch as conservation of atoms in an interconnected chemical system. In well\nperforming models, these nonphysical deviations are often ignored because they\nare frequently minor, and thus only need a small nudge to perfectly conserve\nmass. Here we introduce a method that anchors a prediction from any numerical\nmodel to physically consistent hard constraints, nudging concentrations to the\nnearest solution that respects the conservation laws. This closed-form\nmodel-agnostic correction uses a single matrix operation to minimally perturb\nthe predicted concentrations to ensure that atoms are conserved to machine\nprecision. To demonstrate this approach, we train a gradient boosting decision\ntree ensemble to emulate a small reference model of ozone photochemistry and\ntest the effect of the correction on accurate but non-conservative predictions.\nThe nudging approach minimally perturbs the already well-predicted results for\nmost species, but decreases the accuracy of important oxidants, including\nradicals. We develop a weighted extension of this nudging approach that\nconsiders the uncertainty and magnitude of each species in the correction. This\nspecies-level weighting approach is essential to accurately predict important\nlow concentration species such as radicals. We find that applying the\nuncertainty-weighted correction to the nonphysical predictions slightly\nimproves overall accuracy, by nudging the predictions to a more likely\nmass-conserving solution.","PeriodicalId":501166,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nudge to the truth: atom conservation as a hard constraint in models of atmospheric composition using an uncertainty-weighted correction\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Obin Sturm, Sam J. Silva\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.16109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computational models of atmospheric composition are not always physically\\nconsistent. For example, not all models respect fundamental conservation laws\\nsuch as conservation of atoms in an interconnected chemical system. In well\\nperforming models, these nonphysical deviations are often ignored because they\\nare frequently minor, and thus only need a small nudge to perfectly conserve\\nmass. Here we introduce a method that anchors a prediction from any numerical\\nmodel to physically consistent hard constraints, nudging concentrations to the\\nnearest solution that respects the conservation laws. This closed-form\\nmodel-agnostic correction uses a single matrix operation to minimally perturb\\nthe predicted concentrations to ensure that atoms are conserved to machine\\nprecision. To demonstrate this approach, we train a gradient boosting decision\\ntree ensemble to emulate a small reference model of ozone photochemistry and\\ntest the effect of the correction on accurate but non-conservative predictions.\\nThe nudging approach minimally perturbs the already well-predicted results for\\nmost species, but decreases the accuracy of important oxidants, including\\nradicals. We develop a weighted extension of this nudging approach that\\nconsiders the uncertainty and magnitude of each species in the correction. This\\nspecies-level weighting approach is essential to accurately predict important\\nlow concentration species such as radicals. We find that applying the\\nuncertainty-weighted correction to the nonphysical predictions slightly\\nimproves overall accuracy, by nudging the predictions to a more likely\\nmass-conserving solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.16109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.16109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大气成分的计算模型并不总是符合物理规律。例如,并非所有模型都遵守基本守恒定律,如相互关联的化学系统中的原子守恒定律。在性能良好的模型中,这些非物理偏差往往会被忽略,因为它们往往是微小的,因此只需要很小的推移就能完全保证质量。在这里,我们介绍了一种方法,它可以将任何数值模型的预测与物理上一致的硬约束条件联系起来,将浓度推向最接近守恒定律的解。这种与封闭模型无关的修正方法只需进行一次矩阵运算,就能将预测浓度的扰动降到最低,从而确保原子守恒达到机器精度。为了演示这种方法,我们训练了梯度提升决策树集合来模拟臭氧光化学的小型参考模型,并测试了修正对精确但非保守预测的影响。我们开发了一种加权扩展的修正方法,它考虑了修正中每个物种的不确定性和程度。这种物种级别的加权方法对于准确预测自由基等重要的低浓度物种至关重要。我们发现,将不确定性加权校正应用于非物理预测,通过将预测推向更有可能的质量守恒解,可以略微提高整体准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A nudge to the truth: atom conservation as a hard constraint in models of atmospheric composition using an uncertainty-weighted correction
Computational models of atmospheric composition are not always physically consistent. For example, not all models respect fundamental conservation laws such as conservation of atoms in an interconnected chemical system. In well performing models, these nonphysical deviations are often ignored because they are frequently minor, and thus only need a small nudge to perfectly conserve mass. Here we introduce a method that anchors a prediction from any numerical model to physically consistent hard constraints, nudging concentrations to the nearest solution that respects the conservation laws. This closed-form model-agnostic correction uses a single matrix operation to minimally perturb the predicted concentrations to ensure that atoms are conserved to machine precision. To demonstrate this approach, we train a gradient boosting decision tree ensemble to emulate a small reference model of ozone photochemistry and test the effect of the correction on accurate but non-conservative predictions. The nudging approach minimally perturbs the already well-predicted results for most species, but decreases the accuracy of important oxidants, including radicals. We develop a weighted extension of this nudging approach that considers the uncertainty and magnitude of each species in the correction. This species-level weighting approach is essential to accurately predict important low concentration species such as radicals. We find that applying the uncertainty-weighted correction to the nonphysical predictions slightly improves overall accuracy, by nudging the predictions to a more likely mass-conserving solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Harnessing AI data-driven global weather models for climate attribution: An analysis of the 2017 Oroville Dam extreme atmospheric river Super Resolution On Global Weather Forecasts Can Transfer Learning be Used to Identify Tropical State-Dependent Bias Relevant to Midlatitude Subseasonal Predictability? Using Generative Models to Produce Realistic Populations of the United Kingdom Windstorms Integrated nowcasting of convective precipitation with Transformer-based models using multi-source data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1