对美国垃圾填埋场甲烷年排放量和趋势的卫星监测

Nicholas Balasus, Daniel J. Jacob, Gabriel Maxemin, Carrie Jenks, Hannah Nesser, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Daniel H. Cusworth, Tia R. Scarpelli, Daniel J. Varon, Xiaolin Wang
{"title":"对美国垃圾填埋场甲烷年排放量和趋势的卫星监测","authors":"Nicholas Balasus, Daniel J. Jacob, Gabriel Maxemin, Carrie Jenks, Hannah Nesser, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Daniel H. Cusworth, Tia R. Scarpelli, Daniel J. Varon, Xiaolin Wang","doi":"arxiv-2408.10957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use satellite observations of atmospheric methane from the TROPOMI\ninstrument to estimate total annual methane emissions for 2019-2023 from four\nlarge Southeast US landfills with gas collection and control systems. The\nemissions are on average 6$\\times$ higher than the values reported by the\nlandfills to the US Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) which are used by\nthe US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for its national Greenhouse Gas\nInventory (GHGI). We find increasing emissions over the 2019-2023 period\nwhereas the GHGRP reports a decrease. The GHGRP requires gas-collecting\nlandfills to estimate their annual emissions either with a recovery-first model\n(estimating emissions as a function of methane recovered) or a generation-first\nmodel (estimating emissions from a first-order-decay applied to\nwaste-in-place). All four landfills choose to use the recovery-first model,\nwhich yields emissions that are one-quarter of those from the generation-first\nmodel and decreasing over 2019-2023, in contrast with the TROPOMI observations.\nOur TROPOMI estimates for two of the landfills agree with the generation-first\nmodel, with increasing emissions over 2019-2023 due to increasing\nwaste-in-place or decreasing methane recovery, and are still higher than the\ngeneration-first model for the other two landfills. Further examination of the\nGHGRP emissions from all reporting landfills in the US shows that the 19%\ndecrease in landfill emissions reported by the GHGI over 2005-2022 reflects an\nincreasing preference for the recovery-first model by the reporting landfills,\nrather than an actual emission decrease. The generation-first model would imply\nan increase in landfill emissions over 2013-2022, and this is more consistent\nwith atmospheric observations.","PeriodicalId":501166,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satellite monitoring of annual US landfill methane emissions and trends\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Balasus, Daniel J. Jacob, Gabriel Maxemin, Carrie Jenks, Hannah Nesser, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Daniel H. Cusworth, Tia R. Scarpelli, Daniel J. Varon, Xiaolin Wang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.10957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use satellite observations of atmospheric methane from the TROPOMI\\ninstrument to estimate total annual methane emissions for 2019-2023 from four\\nlarge Southeast US landfills with gas collection and control systems. The\\nemissions are on average 6$\\\\times$ higher than the values reported by the\\nlandfills to the US Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) which are used by\\nthe US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for its national Greenhouse Gas\\nInventory (GHGI). We find increasing emissions over the 2019-2023 period\\nwhereas the GHGRP reports a decrease. The GHGRP requires gas-collecting\\nlandfills to estimate their annual emissions either with a recovery-first model\\n(estimating emissions as a function of methane recovered) or a generation-first\\nmodel (estimating emissions from a first-order-decay applied to\\nwaste-in-place). All four landfills choose to use the recovery-first model,\\nwhich yields emissions that are one-quarter of those from the generation-first\\nmodel and decreasing over 2019-2023, in contrast with the TROPOMI observations.\\nOur TROPOMI estimates for two of the landfills agree with the generation-first\\nmodel, with increasing emissions over 2019-2023 due to increasing\\nwaste-in-place or decreasing methane recovery, and are still higher than the\\ngeneration-first model for the other two landfills. Further examination of the\\nGHGRP emissions from all reporting landfills in the US shows that the 19%\\ndecrease in landfill emissions reported by the GHGI over 2005-2022 reflects an\\nincreasing preference for the recovery-first model by the reporting landfills,\\nrather than an actual emission decrease. The generation-first model would imply\\nan increase in landfill emissions over 2013-2022, and this is more consistent\\nwith atmospheric observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用 TROPOMI 仪器对大气中甲烷的卫星观测结果,估算了美国东南部四个大型垃圾填埋场在 2019-2023 年的甲烷年排放总量,这些填埋场都配备了气体收集和控制系统。该排放量比垃圾填埋场向美国温室气体报告计划(GHGRP)报告的数值平均高出 6 美元/倍,美国环境保护局(EPA)在编制国家温室气体清单(GHGI)时使用了该报告数值。我们发现 2019-2023 年期间的排放量在增加,而 GHGRP 报告的排放量在减少。GHGRP 要求气体收集填埋场使用回收优先模型(以甲烷回收量的函数来估算排放量)或生成优先模型(以就地废物的一阶衰变来估算排放量)来估算其年排放量。所有四个垃圾填埋场都选择使用 "回收优先 "模 型,该模型产生的排放量是 "生成优先 "模型的四分 之一,并且在 2019-2023 年期间不断减少,这与 TROPOMI 的观测结果形成鲜明对比。我们对其中两个垃圾填埋场的 TROPOMI 估计值与 "生成优先 "模型一致,在 2019-2023 年期间,由于就地废物增加或甲烷回收减少,排放量不断增加,但仍高于另外两个垃圾填埋场的 "生成优先 "模型。对美国所有报告垃圾填埋场的全球温室气体清单排放量的进一步研究表明,全球温室气体清单报告的 2005-2022 年垃圾填埋场排放量减少 19% 反映了报告的垃圾填埋场越来越倾向于回收优先模式,而不是实际排放量的减少。发电优先模式意味着 2013-2022 年垃圾填埋场排放量增加,这与大气观测结果更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satellite monitoring of annual US landfill methane emissions and trends
We use satellite observations of atmospheric methane from the TROPOMI instrument to estimate total annual methane emissions for 2019-2023 from four large Southeast US landfills with gas collection and control systems. The emissions are on average 6$\times$ higher than the values reported by the landfills to the US Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) which are used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for its national Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI). We find increasing emissions over the 2019-2023 period whereas the GHGRP reports a decrease. The GHGRP requires gas-collecting landfills to estimate their annual emissions either with a recovery-first model (estimating emissions as a function of methane recovered) or a generation-first model (estimating emissions from a first-order-decay applied to waste-in-place). All four landfills choose to use the recovery-first model, which yields emissions that are one-quarter of those from the generation-first model and decreasing over 2019-2023, in contrast with the TROPOMI observations. Our TROPOMI estimates for two of the landfills agree with the generation-first model, with increasing emissions over 2019-2023 due to increasing waste-in-place or decreasing methane recovery, and are still higher than the generation-first model for the other two landfills. Further examination of the GHGRP emissions from all reporting landfills in the US shows that the 19% decrease in landfill emissions reported by the GHGI over 2005-2022 reflects an increasing preference for the recovery-first model by the reporting landfills, rather than an actual emission decrease. The generation-first model would imply an increase in landfill emissions over 2013-2022, and this is more consistent with atmospheric observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Harnessing AI data-driven global weather models for climate attribution: An analysis of the 2017 Oroville Dam extreme atmospheric river Super Resolution On Global Weather Forecasts Can Transfer Learning be Used to Identify Tropical State-Dependent Bias Relevant to Midlatitude Subseasonal Predictability? Using Generative Models to Produce Realistic Populations of the United Kingdom Windstorms Integrated nowcasting of convective precipitation with Transformer-based models using multi-source data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1