通过术中激光斑点对比成像(LSCI)监测乳头分离乳房切除术(NSM)中的乳腺模块化切除术(BMR)提高了研究员的手术培训效果

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.011
Ru Yao, Fengzhou Du, Runzhu Liu, Linjuan Tan, Jie Lian, Lu Gao, Hailin Zhang, Li Huang, Bo Pan, Yidong Zhou, Qiang Sun, Jun Zhao, Xiao Long
{"title":"通过术中激光斑点对比成像(LSCI)监测乳头分离乳房切除术(NSM)中的乳腺模块化切除术(BMR)提高了研究员的手术培训效果","authors":"Ru Yao, Fengzhou Du, Runzhu Liu, Linjuan Tan, Jie Lian, Lu Gao, Hailin Zhang, Li Huang, Bo Pan, Yidong Zhou, Qiang Sun, Jun Zhao, Xiao Long","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are challenging for surgical training among fellow trainees. We developed a surgical training course with novel concept of breast modular resection (BMR) for NSM/SSM procedure, and performed this study to investigate whether BMR could improve surgical outcomes compared to classical procedure resection (CPR). The records of 105 breast cancer patients undergoing NSM/SSM with immediate reconstruction performed by fellow trainees were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was performed to intraoperatively evaluate the blood supply of the NAC, and the absolute perfusion unit (PU) values and relative perfusion unit (rPU) values were further compared. Surgical training outcomes of BMR group ( = 52) were insignificantly improved compared to CPR group ( = 53). The rates of NAC necrosis, flap necrosis and implant removal all reduced respectively. Among the 60 NSM patients, the blood loss ( = .011) and surgery time ( < .001) was significantly reduced in BMR group ( = 30) and all the other outcomes were insignificantly improved. Both the absolute PU values and rPU values were significantly higher among patients without NAC necrosis ( < .001). The absolute PU values were significantly higher in BMR group ( = .002). Compared to CPR, the BMR-based surgical training course for NSM demonstrated the reduction in complications and operating time, offering a potential streamlined, efficient, and safe method for NSM procedure. LSCI was effective for intraoperative visualized evaluation of NAC blood supply and could provide effective real-time feedback for fellow trainees.","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Modular Resection (BMR) in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) With Intraoperative Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) Monitoring Improved Surgical Training Outcome Among Fellows\",\"authors\":\"Ru Yao, Fengzhou Du, Runzhu Liu, Linjuan Tan, Jie Lian, Lu Gao, Hailin Zhang, Li Huang, Bo Pan, Yidong Zhou, Qiang Sun, Jun Zhao, Xiao Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are challenging for surgical training among fellow trainees. We developed a surgical training course with novel concept of breast modular resection (BMR) for NSM/SSM procedure, and performed this study to investigate whether BMR could improve surgical outcomes compared to classical procedure resection (CPR). The records of 105 breast cancer patients undergoing NSM/SSM with immediate reconstruction performed by fellow trainees were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was performed to intraoperatively evaluate the blood supply of the NAC, and the absolute perfusion unit (PU) values and relative perfusion unit (rPU) values were further compared. Surgical training outcomes of BMR group ( = 52) were insignificantly improved compared to CPR group ( = 53). The rates of NAC necrosis, flap necrosis and implant removal all reduced respectively. Among the 60 NSM patients, the blood loss ( = .011) and surgery time ( < .001) was significantly reduced in BMR group ( = 30) and all the other outcomes were insignificantly improved. Both the absolute PU values and rPU values were significantly higher among patients without NAC necrosis ( < .001). The absolute PU values were significantly higher in BMR group ( = .002). Compared to CPR, the BMR-based surgical training course for NSM demonstrated the reduction in complications and operating time, offering a potential streamlined, efficient, and safe method for NSM procedure. LSCI was effective for intraoperative visualized evaluation of NAC blood supply and could provide effective real-time feedback for fellow trainees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)和皮肤保留乳房切除术(SSM)对受训学员的外科培训具有挑战性。我们为 NSM/SSM 手术开发了一个具有乳腺模块化切除术(BMR)新概念的外科培训课程,并开展了这项研究,探讨与传统手术切除术(CPR)相比,BMR 是否能改善手术效果。本研究回顾了105名乳腺癌患者的病历,这些患者接受了NSM/SSM手术,并由受训人员进行了即刻重建。比较了两组患者的临床病理特征和手术效果。激光斑点对比成像(LSCI)用于术中评估NAC的血液供应,并进一步比较绝对灌注单位(PU)值和相对灌注单位(rPU)值。与心肺复苏组(= 53)相比,BMR 组(= 52)的手术训练结果改善不明显。NAC坏死率、皮瓣坏死率和植入物移除率均分别下降。在 60 例 NSM 患者中,BMR 组(= 30 例)的失血量(= .011)和手术时间(< .001)显著减少,其他结果改善不明显。未发生 NAC 坏死的患者的 PU 绝对值和 rPU 值均明显较高 ( < .001)。BMR 组的 PU 绝对值明显更高 ( = .002)。与 CPR 相比,基于 BMR 的 NSM 手术培训课程减少了并发症和手术时间,为 NSM 手术提供了一种潜在的简化、高效和安全的方法。LSCI 对术中可视化评估 NAC 供血非常有效,并能为学员提供有效的实时反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breast Modular Resection (BMR) in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) With Intraoperative Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) Monitoring Improved Surgical Training Outcome Among Fellows
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are challenging for surgical training among fellow trainees. We developed a surgical training course with novel concept of breast modular resection (BMR) for NSM/SSM procedure, and performed this study to investigate whether BMR could improve surgical outcomes compared to classical procedure resection (CPR). The records of 105 breast cancer patients undergoing NSM/SSM with immediate reconstruction performed by fellow trainees were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was performed to intraoperatively evaluate the blood supply of the NAC, and the absolute perfusion unit (PU) values and relative perfusion unit (rPU) values were further compared. Surgical training outcomes of BMR group ( = 52) were insignificantly improved compared to CPR group ( = 53). The rates of NAC necrosis, flap necrosis and implant removal all reduced respectively. Among the 60 NSM patients, the blood loss ( = .011) and surgery time ( < .001) was significantly reduced in BMR group ( = 30) and all the other outcomes were insignificantly improved. Both the absolute PU values and rPU values were significantly higher among patients without NAC necrosis ( < .001). The absolute PU values were significantly higher in BMR group ( = .002). Compared to CPR, the BMR-based surgical training course for NSM demonstrated the reduction in complications and operating time, offering a potential streamlined, efficient, and safe method for NSM procedure. LSCI was effective for intraoperative visualized evaluation of NAC blood supply and could provide effective real-time feedback for fellow trainees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathologic Features and Digital Imaging Analysis of HER2 Protein in Breast Carcinomas With Different HER2 Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Patterns. USP4/CARM1 Axis Promotes the Malignant Transformation of Breast Cancer Cells by Upregulating SLC7A11 Expression. Disparities in Hereditary Genetic Testing in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index is a Predictor of Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer. Comparison of [18F] FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the Detection of Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1